Challenges in Diagnosing Metastatic Uterine PEComa: Insights from Two Case Studies

Cédric Kabeya; Mathilde Lancelle; Gregory Demolin; Céline Wattier; Camille Marchisello; Antonino Buonomo; Sandhya Fonseca

doi:10.12659/AJCR.944365

23 August 2024 : Case report Belgium

Challenges in Diagnosing Metastatic Uterine PEComa: Insights from Two Case Studies

Challenging differential diagnosis, Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Rare disease

Cédric Kabeya^1ABDEF*, Mathilde Lancelle^1E, Gregory Demolin^2DE, Céline Wattier^1E, Camille Marchisello^2E, Antonino Buonomo^1ABDEF, Sandhya Fonseca^3ABDE

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944365

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944365

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Introduction Case Reports Discussion Conclusions References:

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Figure 8. Hepatic metastasis (cross-section): (A) T1-weighted sequence; (B) T2-weighted sequence; (C) Diffusion sequence; (D) Arterial phase; (E) Portal phase; (F) Delayed phase.

Back to the Article

Challenges in Diagnosing Metastatic Uterine PEComa: Insights from Two Case Studies

Your Privacy