11 October 2013
: Case report
Exchange of intraoperative balloon occlusion of the internal iliac artery for the common iliac artery during cesarean hysterectomy in a patient with placenta percreta
Unusual clinical course, Unusual setting of medical care, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Kenji HishikawaABCDEF, Masafumi KoshiyamaACDE, Masashi UedaBD, Ayaka YamaguchiBD, Shingo UkitaBD, Haruhiko YagiBD, Kazuyo KakuiBDDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.889449
Am J Case Rep 2013; 14:409-411
Abstract
Background: The generally accepted treatment for placenta percreta is cesarean hysterectomy without attempts to detach the placenta. Preoperative internal iliac artery balloon occlusion (IIABO) has been widely performed to minimize blood loss during cesarean hysterectomy for an abnormal attachment of the placenta. Our case is the first reported case of common iliac artery balloon occlusion (CIABO) being more effective than IIABO for reducing blood loss during a cesarean hysterectomy in the same patient.
Case Report: We performed cesarean hysterectomy with IIABO in a 36-year-old Japanese female who had placenta percreta. However, there was still a large amount of blood loss. We immediately changed the balloon from the internal iliac artery to the common iliac artery, which visibly reduced the amount of blood loss. We finally achieved cesarean hysterectomy.
Conclusions: CIABO was found to be more effective than IIABO for reducing blood loss during cesarean hysterectomy. Failure of IIABO can be explained by the presence of extensive anastomoses in the pelvic vasculature.
Keywords: Balloon Occlusion, internal iliac artery, common iliac artery, placenta percreta, cesarean hysterectomy
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.946215
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.946869
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.947011
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.946427
Most Viewed Current Articles
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
94,176
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
51,416
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133
20 Nov 2023 : Case report
28,562
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.941424
Am J Case Rep 2023; 24:e941424
18 Feb 2024 : Case report
23,092
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943030
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943030