09 March 2017
: Case report
Magnetic Resonance (MR) Cholangiopancreatography Demonstration of the Cystic Duct Entering the Right Hepatic Duct
Mistake in diagnosis, Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents, Congenital defects / diseases, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Tommaso D'Angelo1AE, Sergio Racchiusa1AE, Silvio Mazziotti1AE, Giuseppe Cicero1AE*DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.902620
Am J Case Rep 2017; 18:242-245
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MR cholangiopancreatography is widely performed before laparoscopic cholecystectomy to rule out choledocholithiasis and to avoid iatrogenic injuries that may be related to the high frequency of anatomical variations of the biliary tree. Although most of these variants have already been demonstrated surgically and by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and CT cholangiography, there are no references in which MR cholangiopancreatography has shown a cystic duct draining into the right hepatic biliary duct.
CASE REPORT: A 51-year-old woman with a history of recurrent abdominal pain underwent an abdominal ultrasound in an outside center, which revealed gallbladder cholelithiasis. In this patient, an MR cholangiopancreatography was performed and the laboratory data were obtained. Laboratory findings showed only a mild increase of cholestasis. MRCP did not reveal significant dilatation of intra- or extrahepatic biliary ducts, while the cystic duct showed an atypical insertion, draining directly into the right hepatic duct.
CONCLUSIONS: To avoid unintentional bile duct injuries, MRCP evaluation of the biliary anatomy is particularly important for pre-operative evaluation of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In particular, in the case we describe, the right hepatic duct might have been mistaken for the cystic duct, with potentially severe surgical complications and clinical consequences.
Keywords: Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic, Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Cystic Duct
SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
31 January 2023 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.937955
18 January 2023 : Case report
Am J Case Rep 2023; 24:e938667
30 December 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e938571
22 December 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e938003
In Press
02 Feb 2023 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.938569
01 Feb 2023 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.938498
31 Jan 2023 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.937955
31 Jan 2023 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.938889
Most Viewed Current Articles
13 Jul 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.936441
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e936441
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
23 Feb 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935250
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250
17 Feb 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934399
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934399