26 June 2017
: Case report
Extraovarian Primary Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Case Report
Challenging differential diagnosis, Rare disease, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Gregory Nicolas1ACDEF*, Tony Kfoury2AEFG, Hassan Fawaz2BDFG, Mahdi Issa2DFGDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.902801
Am J Case Rep 2017; 18:714-718
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extraovarian primary peritoneal carcinoma (EOPPC) is a rare malignant epithelial tumor with an age-adjusted incidence rate of 6.78 per million, which arises from the peritoneal lining with minimal or no ovarian involvement. EOPPC is a diagnosis of exclusion with the absence of other identifiable primary sites and after surgical assessment and consideration of the histological report to evaluate the extent of ovarian invasion.
CASE REPORT: A 66-year-old woman complained of mild postprandial epigastric pain. Physical exam revealed positive bowel sounds over all 4 quadrants, with a soft, non-tender abdomen. Distension and dullness to percussion were noted. A CT scan revealed peritoneal fluid, and evaluation of the peritoneal fluid showed an elevated white blood cell count, while fulfilling criteria for exudate. There was no bacterial growth from the peritoneal fluid. Serum tumor markers CEA were significantly elevated, suggestive of an underlying malignancy. An exploratory laparoscopy confirmed diffuse carcinomatosis in the omentum, the coloparietal region bilaterally, as well as surrounding small bowel loops, the transverse and sigmoid colon, and the rectum. A bilateral oophorectomy was performed and 2 biopsies from the thickened peritoneum were taken. The histomorphological features from the pathology examination concluded the patient had peritoneal serous carcinoma with uninvolved ovaries.
CONCLUSIONS: EOPPC may be misdiagnosed as epithelial ovarian cancer, and should be considered in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, normal-sized ovaries, and no identifiable primary lesion. Since the common therapeutic strategies achieve comparable survival rates, failed recognition may be without consequences. However, to further improve survival, optimal cytoreductive surgery is essential and should be made a priority in disease management.
Keywords: Laparoscopes, Medical Oncology, Oncology Service, Hospital
SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
29 June 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936896
16 June 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936498
13 June 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936889
13 June 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936128
In Press
30 Jun 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936967
30 Jun 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936896
29 Jun 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936313
29 Jun 2022 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.935242
Most Viewed Current Articles
23 Feb 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935250
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250
17 Feb 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934399
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934399
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
09 Feb 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934744
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934744