21 November 2023
: Case report
[In Press] Results and Complications After Single-Stage Repair of Aortopulmonary Window and Interrupted Aortic Arch in a 32-Week Preterm and a Full-Term Neonate
Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents, Rare disease
Chih Wei Ten1ABCEF, Yu-san Chien23EF, Shu-Jen Yeh1BCD, Ming-Ren Chen1ABCD, Kang-Hong Hsu4ABC, Chung-I Chang4ADEFAm J Case Rep In Press; DOI: :: ID: 942193
Available online: 2023-11-21, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
An aortopulmonary window (APW) is an uncommon congenital defect of the septation between the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk. The combination of APW and interrupted aortic arch (IAA) is even rarer, with the hallmark characteristics of high peri-operative mortality and postoperative obstruction of the aortic arch, pulmonary artery, and left main bronchus. These complications often need re-interventions.
CASE REPORT
We present 2 cases with diagnoses of APW and IAA that were treated with single-stage repair. Case 1: A male 32-week premature newborn (weight 1789 g) had APW type I and IAA type A. He had severe postoperative aortic arch obstruction on postoperative day 1, and we re-intervened promptly. He was still asymptomatic after 6 years. Case 2: A male term neonate had APW type III and IAA type A. He had left vocal cord paralysis and left bronchial compression postoperatively. We applied prolonged noninvasive respiratory supports. The complications resolved without re-intervention on postoperative day 66. Progressive arch stenosis at anastomosis after operation required close follow-up with echocardiography.
CONCLUSIONS
These 2 reports highlight the feasibility of single-stage surgical repair while addressing 2 challenges: (1) Recurrent arch stenosis: Lower body weight and direct end-to-side anastomosis without patch augmentation could be risk factors for re-intervention. (2) Bronchial compression: Presentation of the second reported case implied that bronchial compression may not warrant immediate re-intervention unless there is complete obstruction, persistent atelectasis, or recurrent infection. Further studies on long-term outcomes of different surgical procedure would help us to clarify the proper way to avoid re-intervention.
Keywords: Heart Septal Defects; Aortic Coarctation; Heart Defects, Congenital; Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures
In Press
01 Dec 2023 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI:
01 Dec 2023 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI:
01 Dec 2023 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI:
30 Nov 2023 : Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI:
Most Viewed Current Articles
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
19 Jul 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.936128
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e936128
13 Jul 2022 : Case report
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.936441
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e936441