Effectiveness of Prolotherapy Combined with Physical Therapy Versus Physical Therapy Only for Frozen Shoulder: A Case Report

Nuralam Sam; Irawan Yusuf; Irfan Idris; Endy Adnan; Ratna Darjanti Haryadi; Firdaus Hamid; Muhammad Andry Usman; Muhammad Phetrus Johan; Andi Alfian Zainuddin; Agussalim Bukhari

doi:10.12659/AJCR.936995

12 October 2022 : Case report Indonesia

Effectiveness of Prolotherapy Combined with Physical Therapy Versus Physical Therapy Only for Frozen Shoulder: A Case Report

Unknown etiology, Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents, Rare coexistence of disease or pathology

Nuralam Sam^1ABCDEF*, Irawan Yusuf^1ABCDEF, Irfan Idris^2ABCDEF, Endy Adnan^3ABCDEF, Ratna Darjanti Haryadi^4ABCDEF, Firdaus Hamid^5ABCDEF, Muhammad Andry Usman^6ABCDEF, Muhammad Phetrus Johan

^6ABCDEF, Andi Alfian Zainuddin

^7ABCDEF, Agussalim Bukhari^8ABCDEF

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936995

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e936995

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Background Case Reports Discussion Conclusions References:

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 3. Range of motion “Patient A” after intervention.

Range of motion	Weeks 2	Weeks 6	Weeks 12
Flexion (0–180°)	130°	140°	170°
Extension (0–90°)	50°	55°	60°
Abduction (0–180°)	115°	135°	170°
Adduction (30–75°)	50°	60°	60°
External rotation (0–45°)	50°	50°	60°
Internal rotation (0–90°)	50°	60°	75°

Back to the Article

Effectiveness of Prolotherapy Combined with Physical Therapy Versus Physical Therapy Only for Frozen Shoulder: A Case Report

Your Privacy