Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

16 September 2024 : Case report  Greece

Focal Autoimmune Pancreatitis Morphologically Mimicking Pancreatic Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review

Challenging differential diagnosis

Daniel Paramythiotis1ADEF, Eleni Karlafti23ABCDEF*, Krystallenia Siniosoglou1BCDE, Dimitrios Tsavdaris1E, Ioanna Abba Deka ORCID logo4BDE, Georgia Raptou4DE, Xanthippi G. Mavropoulou5BD, Elizabeth Psoma5BD, Stavros Panidis1BD, Antonios Michalopoulos1ABD

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944286

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944286

Table 1. Review of 18 studies published in the last 11 years on postoperative cases with autoimmune pancreatitis.

Study (study period) [Ref]Study cohortAIP typeSymptomsWeight lossIgG4
Detlefsen, 2012 (1987–2010) []20 114 patients with AIPType 1: 63 (55.3%)Type 2: 51 (44.7%)UNUNAvailable in 29 patients (25.4%) (+) type 1 (Postoperative): 12/18 (66.7%) type 2: 1/11 (9.1%)
van Heerde, 2012 (2000–2009) []15 7 patients with AIP among 274 PDs (2.6%)type 1: 2 (28,5%)type 2: 4 (57.2%)Jaundice (86%), weight loss, Pain moderate/severe (29%), Recent onset diabetes (29%)Mean weight loss 2.7 kg(+) 1/3 (preoperational)
Yurci, 2013 (1990–2012) []16 47 patients with AIP, 24 underwent surgerytype 1: 29 (74.3%)type 2: 7 (17.9%)Abdominal pain 29 (61.7%), Acute pancreatitis 19 (40.4%), Weight loss 28 (59.6%)UNAvailable in 21 patients, 0–139: 10 patients (47.6%), 140–279: 4 patients (19.0%), ≥280: 7 patients (33.3%)
Miura, 2013 (1990–2010) []14 13 patients with AIP in comparison to 29 patients with CPtype 1 (100%)Abdominal pain (46%), Jaundice (23%)UN(+) in (Preoperational), (+) in (Post Operational)
Vitali, 2014 (2005–2011) []17 11 patients with AIP among 373 surgical operations for pancreatic cancertype 1: 8type 2: 3Abdominal pain (64%), Weight loss (64%), Jaundice (36%), Acute pancreatitis (27%)59%, (range 13.7–9.4 kg)UN
Macinga, 2017 (2000–2013) []18 15 patients with AIP among 295 patients who underwent surgerytype 1: 6type 2: 9Weight loss (80%), Jaundice (47%), Diabetes (33%)AIP: 8,5kg (range 3–12), AIP +PC: 15.5 (range 8–50)Normal range (preoperative): 100% (from the total 3 patients with available results)
Dickerson, 2019 (1997–2016) []21 45 patients with AIP, 27 underwent surgerytype 1: 16type 2: 9UNUN(+) 2/11
Seki, 2023 (1979–2018) []19 19 patients with AIPtype 1: 18type 2: 1Epigastralgia (n=4, 21%), Jaundice (n=3, 15,7%), Backache (n=2, 10,5%)UNMeasured in 5 patients, (+) in 3 patients
Ikeura et al, 2014 []26 30 patients with AIPType 1: 23Type 2: 7Jaundice 17Abdominal pain 11Weight loss 10UN17% >2× upper limit of normal value 39% 1–2× upper limit of normal value
Wojcicki et al, 2015 []27 9 patients with AIP among 469 patients who underwent surgeryType 1: 8Type 2: 1Jaundice 16 (47.06%), Pain 18 (52.94%), Weight loss 16 (47.06%)UNUN
Kimura et al, 2014 []25 6 patients with AIP type 1, underwent surgery100% AIP type 13 Epigastralgia2 JaundiceUN4 patients had an elevated level, 0–139: 0 patients, 140–279: 3 patients, ≥280: 1 patient
Zhang et al, 2015 (2003–2012) []23 16 patients with AIP among 271 patients who underwent surgeryType 1: 126 Emaciation7 Jaundice7 Abdominal painUN12 patients had an elevated level
Clark et al, 2013 (1986–2011) []31 74 patients with AIP who underwent surgerytype 1: 34type 2: 2925 Pancreatitis34 Jaundice33 Weight lossUNMedian serum IgG4 of 64 mg/d for 10 patients
Ünalp et al, 2012 (2001–2010) []28 10 patients with AIP type 1, underwent surgery100% AIP type 17 Jaundice1 Abdominal painUNNot examined
Zhang et al, 2013 (1990–2010) []24 10 patients with AIP among 105 patients who underwent surgerytype 1: 7type 2: 3UNUN7 patients had an elevated level
Nikolic et al, 2022 (2001–2020) []22 35 patients with AIP who underwent surgerytype 1: 28type 2: 715 Jaundice17 Weight loss17 Abdominal painUN7 patients had an elevated level
Vujasinovic et al, 2018 (2004–2018) []29 71 patients with AIP, 20 underwent surgerytype 1: 62type 2: 925 Jaundice28 Weight loss and Abdominal painUN27 patients had an elevated level
Tran et al, 2012 (2000–2010) []30 6 patients with AIP among 65 patients who underwent PD100% AIP type 16 Jaundice5 Weight loss4 Abdominal pain15 kg: 2 patients25 kg: 2 patients30 kg: 1 patient6 patients had an elevated level
UN – unmentioned; PD – pancreatoduodenectomy; CP – chronic pancreatitis.
Study (study period) [Ref]CA 19-9ImagingSteroid trialPreoperative biopsyConcurrent malignancy
Detlefsen, 2012 (1987–2010) []20 UNUNUNUNNone
van Heerde, 2012 (2000–2009) []15 (+) 3/7 (preoperational)Non-typicalNoneEUS-FNA performed in 1 patientUN
Yurci, 2013 (1990–2012) []16 Available in 30 patients, >150 IU/ml: 6 patients(20.0%)Based on History classification, strongly signifying AIP: 10 patients, supportive of AIP: 6 patients, strongly signifying cancer: 7 patientsnone before resection7 pts Cytology was negative in 6 cases and showed atypical ductal cells in 1 caseUN
Miura, 2013 (1990–2010) []14 UNStenosis of the MPD: 10 patients (70%), Expansion of the MPD: 6 patients (46%), Pancreatic parenchymal expansion: Focal: 5 patients, Diffuse: 3 patientsUNUNNone
Vitali, 2014 (2005–2011) []17 UNUNUNUNNone
Macinga, 2017 (2000–2013) []18 Patients with AIP: 35.2 kU/L (median), patients with AIP + PC: 89.8 kU/L (median)CT: Atypical imaging: 9 patients, Level 2 evidence based on ICDC: 6 patientsUNEUS-FNA in 11 patients, AIP + PC: 3 positive, 1 inconclusive,AIP: 4 true negative, 2 false positive, 1 inconclusiveType 1: 2 type 2: 4
Dickerson, 2019 (1997–2016) []21 (+) 12/26Stenosis of the MPD: 5 patients (20%), Expansion of the MPD: 3 patients (12%), Pancreatic parenchymal expansion: focal: 6 patients (24%), diffuse: 14 patients (56%), Tumor-like mass: 4 patients (16%), Double duct sign: 3 patients (12%)UNthe EUS-FNA performed was negative for AIP3 patients
Seki, 2023 (1979–2018) []19 UNAbnormality at the MPD or/ and the common bile duct(n=9), incasement of the large vessels(n=4)UNEUS was performed for 3 patients, 1 diagnosed with TFCPUN
Ikeura et al, 2014 []26 UNCT or MRI revealed focal enlargement of the pancreas in 19 patients (63%) and pancreatic mass in 11 patients (37%). Delayed enhancement of the lesion was observed in 6 of 9 patients who underwent dynamic CT or MRI.30% of the patientsUNUN
Wojcicki et al, 2015 []27 Available in 28 out of the 34 patients with levels >37 U/ml present only in 8Mass could be identified in 3 patients, biliary and pancreatic duct dilatation was present in 15 and 5 cases respectively and enlarged lymph nodes in 12.UNEUS-FNA samples have been obtained for 5 (4 – benign, 1- ‘atypical cells’).UN
Kimura et al, 2014 []25 0 patients had an elevated levelUNUN2 Pancreatic specimens taken by US-guided percutaneous needle biopsy, EUS-FNACUN
Zhang et al, 2015 (2003–2012) []23 9 patients had an elevated level11 exhibited diffuse pancreatic enlargement and focal pancreatic enlargement in the head of the pancreas, 4, ‘sausage-like’ pancreatic changes, 3, pancreatic duct expansion and 5, ‘halo’ sign pancreatic changesUNUNUN
Clark et al, 2013 (1986–2011) []31 UN24 Main pancreatic duct dilation8 Pancreatic cyst52 Focal mass14 Diffuse gland enlargementUNUNUN
Ünalp et al, 2012 (2001–2010) []28 8 patients had an elevated levelUNUNUNUN
Zhang et al, 2013 (1990–2010) []24 UNUNUNUNUN
Nikolic et al, 2022 (2001–2020) []22 5 patients had an elevated levelUNUNUN2 patients
Vujasinovic et al, 2018 (2004–2018) []29 UN54 focal pancreatic enlargement19 diffuse enlargement19 signs of acute pancreatitis100% of the patientsUNUN
Tran et al, 2012 (2000–2010) []30 1 patient had an elevated level3 distal bile duct strictures5 pancreatic head masses2 dilated bile duct50% of the patients3 EUS-FNA1 major duodenal papilla core biopsyUN
UN – unmentioned; PD – pancreatoduodenectomy; CP – chronic pancreatitis.

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923