14 July 2022: Articles
Lumbar Spinal Epidural Capillary Hemangioma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Mistake in diagnosis, Rare disease, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Shiying Wu B* , Krishan Kumar Sharma B , Chi Long Ho ADOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936181
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e936181
Table 1. Summary of all the reported cases of spinal epidural capillary hemangioma in the literature.
| First Author, year | Age (years)/gender | Presenting symptoms | Epidural location | Other (MRI) features of tumor | Laminectomy, resection | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gupta, 1996 []17 | 50/M | BP, myelopathy, weakness LL | T8–10 | Post-contrast enhancement | TR | NR, GR |
| Badinand, 2003 []18 | 40/F | Gait disturbance, LL pain, incontinence | T2–4 | T3–4 foraminal extension | TR | NR, GR |
| Kang, 2006 [19 | 56/M | Radiating chest wall pain | T2–4 | Dumbbell-shaped | PR | NR, GR |
| Tekin, 2008 []20 | 56/F | BP, radiates to R thigh, L4 hypoesthesia | L3–4 | Heterogeneous with flow voids | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Akhaddar, 2010 []21 | 19/F | BP, progr gait disturbance | T5–6 | Homogeneously-enhanced, foraminal extension | TR | NR, GR |
| Hasan, 2011 []22 | 57/M | BP, progr myelopathy, weakness LL | T10–12 | Foraminal extension | PR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Shilton, 2011 []23 | 47/F | BP, thoracic myelopathy (post-traumatic) | T7–8 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Vassal, 2011 []24 | 59/F | BP, R intercostal neuralgia | T5–7 | Intrathoracic extension | TR | NR,GR |
| Seferi, 2014 []25 | 58/M | BP, paraparesis, sensory disturbance | T2–4 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR, GR |
| Gencpinar, 2014 []26 | 17/F | Weakness LL | T3–7 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR, GR |
| Garcia-Pallero, 2015 []27 | 67/F | Dyspnea, pleural effusion | T4–5 | Heterogeneous paravertebral tumor with intrathoracic extension | TR | NR, GR |
| Egu, 2016 []28 | 60/F | BP, S1 radiculopathy | L5-S1 | Homogeneous enhancing | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Kilic, 2017 []29 | 40/M | BP, L LL pain (post-traumatic) | L1 | Vertebral body, pedicle and transverse process | TR | NR |
| Rajeev, 2017 []30 | 50/M | Paraparesis LL | L1–2 | Enhancing mass, foraminal extension | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Brasil, 2018 []1 | 69/F | BP | T9–10 | No extension | TR | NR |
| Xu, 2018 []12 | 57/M | BP, LL weakness | T2–3 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| Cofano, 2019 []31 | 52/F | BP | T6–9 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR |
| Sudir, 2019 []32 | 63/M | BP, LL weakness (post-traumatic) | T6–8 | Vertebral body, pedicle and transverse process | TR | NR |
| Niznick, 2020 []14 | 51/F | Sensory and gait disturbances | T5–6 | Foraminal extension | TR | NR |
| Rajpal, 2020 []15 | 29/F | Flank pain | T7 | Foraminal and intrathoracic extension | TR | NR |
| Doi, 2021 []33 | 47/M | BP, LL pain, sensory disturbance, incontinence | L2–4 | Also involves spinous process and laminae | PR | NR |
| Current case | 38/F | Progr BP, gait disturbance, LL weakness and paresthesia | L1–2 | Homogeneous enhancement | TR | NR, symptoms improved |
| BP – backpain; GR – good recovery; F – female; L – left; LL – lower leg, M – male; NR – no recurrence or residual tumor; progr –progressive; PR – partial resection; R – right; TR – total resection. | ||||||