21 June 2024: Articles
Intracranial Parasitic Fetus in a Living Infant: A Case Study with Surgical Intervention and Prognosis Analysis
Challenging differential diagnosis, Unusual setting of medical care, Rare disease, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Xuewei Qin1BE, Xuanling Chen1BE, Xin Zhao1B, Bo Wang1B, Lan Yao1AE*, Hongchuan Niu2BDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fetus in fetu (FIF), or parasitic fetus, is a rare malformation that typically occurs in the retroperitoneum, but can be found in other unusual locations, such as the skull, sacrum, and mouth. The presence of a spine is necessary for diagnosis.
CASE REPORT: Intracranial FIFs were retrospectively studied. Abnormalities were detected in the fetal head during a 33-week prenatal examination; however, MRI could not provide more information, due to space occupation. A baby girl was born via cesarean delivery at 37 weeks, with a large head circumference. She had delays in motor skills and speech development, only able to say “mom”. There was a large mass in the cerebral hemisphere, with a 13-cm maximum diameter, smooth boundary, and internal bone structure visible on head CT scan. Both ventricles and third ventricle had hydrops, with a fetal shape at a continuous level, along with apparent compression near the cerebral parenchyma. After performing preoperative examinations, laboratory tests, and surgical planning, craniotomy was performed on the FIF, under general anesthesia. Following complete mass resection, mouth, eye, arm, and hand shapes could be observed. The patient was unconscious after surgery and had seizures that were difficult to control. She died 12 days after surgery. Teratomas can be distinguished based on anatomy and imaging. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment and its prognosis is poor.
CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial FIF cases are rare and require early diagnosis and surgical treatment. Differentiating between FIF and teratoma is crucial, and monitoring alpha-fetoprotein levels after surgery can help detect recurrence.
Keywords: Fetus-in-Fetu, Teratoma, Anesthesia, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Radiology, Pathology, Fetus
Introduction
A fetus in fetu (FIF), also known as an inclusion fetus or parasitic fetus, refers to a fetus containing one or more additional fetuses within a complete fetus, [1–3]. Its unique diagnostic criteria involve the vertebral system and organoid formation [4], often accompanied by the formation of the ribs and quadrilimb bones [5]. Several hundred cases are reported every year [6,7], mostly in males (with an approximate male to female ratio of 2: 1) [8], and about two-thirds of cases begin before the age of 2 years [2]. Most FIFs live in the retroperitoneum (80%), but some can be found in the oral cavity, brain, mediastinum, thoracic cavity, pelvic cavity, sacrum, and scrotum [6–10]. Several manifestations, such as hydrocephalus in this case, can occur as a secondary effect of the mass on nearby organs. Early detection and surgical removal are the only effective treatments. The following is a case of humanoid differentiation in a FIF admitted to our Neurosurgery Department in 2021.
Case Report
A 1-year-old female patient, with a height of 70 cm and weight of 13.5 kg, was admitted to the hospital because of her inability to stand, along with an increasing head circumference.
At 33 weeks of gestation, a routine prenatal check-up revealed an enlarged fetal head circumference on abdominal ultrasonography. Owing to the inability to determine fetal characteristics through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the intracranial space, a cesarean delivery was performed at 37 weeks because the fetus was in a breech position. Upon birth, the infant’s head circumference was larger than that of a child of the same age. At presentation, she did not display any signs of nausea or vomiting. The child could only raise her head slightly, could not sit up or walk, and could only pronounce “mom”. She exhibited poor fine motor movements in her hands and was incontinent. The patient’s head circumference measured 56.6 cm. A head computed tomography (CT) scan revealed soft tissue, limb-like bone, and mixed bone tissue shadows in the intracranial area, as well as a mixed density mass of 15.0×13×12.5 mm in the intracranial area. Blood tumor markers show an alpha-fetoprotein level of 5.6 ng/mL and human chorionic gonadotropin level of less than 0.1 IU/L, leading to the diagnosis of an intracranial FIF, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. Craniotomy was performed under general anesthesia and tracheal intubation, revealing a white capsule within the brain tissue. Approximately 50 mL of the brown viscous capsule was extracted after opening the capsule, revealing a finger-like limb protruding from its opening (Figure 3).We removed an immature embryo, with visible vernix and organs, such as the mouth, eyes, fetal head, fetal hair, body, forearm, hands, and feet (Figure 4). Intraoperative head MRI confirmed the complete removal of the FIF (Figure 5). MRI of the FIF (Figure 6) allowed visualization of the structures of the spine and long bones. The pathology report detailed 1 embryo, 18 cm in length, exhibiting malformed features and limbs (Figure 4). The fibrous capsular skin was examined, revealing the interior covered with squamous epithelium with hyperkeratosis (Figure 7), consistent with a FIF. Three days after the surgery, the cystic fluid was found to contain amniotic fluid (Figure 8). A-fetoprotein was measured at 1.6 ng/mL and human chorionic gonadotropin at 0.1 IU/L.
Discussion
Intracranial FIFs exhibiting human-caused variations in infants are uncommon. Willis described them in 1935 as masses including the spinal column and other visible organs or limbs [4]. A FIF consists of well-developed fetal organs, spine, and limbs. A spine indicates that the fetus has passed the primary stages of gastrulation, including neural tube formation, polymerization, and symmetrical growth around the vertebral axis [11]. In the present case, a head CT scan of the child revealed a clearly defined spinal structure and long bone structure, further confirming the diagnosis of parasitic pregnancy. It has been reported that the presence of fingers in FIFs facilitates the diagnosis [12]. FIFs remain a mystery, and their causes and mechanisms may be related to environmental pollution, genetics, low temperatures, oocyte senescence, pesticide e exposure during early pregnancy, and other factors [13,14]. FIF is often detected in the late stages of pregnancy or after birth, making early diagnosis challenging [10]. In this study, the mother received a diagnosis during a prenatal examination at 33 weeks of gestation. It has been reported that 89% of cases are detected before 18 months of age [15], possibly due to the disease’s tendency to develop in late gestation, making it rarely detectable during routine screening in the second trimester. Prenatal ultrasound examination is the best method for diagnosing a FIF during pregnancy [16,17], highlighting the importance of regular prenatal check-ups.
Thakral et al [18] reported that the incidence of FIF was equal in males and females when reviewing the literature, yet Patankar et al [19] reported a male to female advantage of 2: 1, compared with teratomas. Most FIFs were found to be male (47: 35) [20]. FIFs are primarily located in the retroperitoneum and abdominal cavity and can grow alongside with the fetus [21]. Many patients can experience mass effects, including abdominal distension, dysphagia, vomiting, difficulty eating, and jaundice [22]. These symptoms depend on the location, growth rate, and size of the FIF. The FIF consists of a fetus suspended from the umbilical cord and fluid containing thin fibrous membranes (the chorio-amniotic complex and amniotic fluid). In the present case, an intracranial parasitic fetal membrane and intracellular fluid were detected pathologically. Squamous epithelium with hyperkeratosis was observed, and amniotic fluid was found in the intracellular fluid. These findings confirmed the diagnosis of a FIF. Most FIFs are treated surgically, and their prognosis depends on the parasitic site [16]. Abdominal FIFs generally have a good prognosis; however, intracranial FIFs carry a nearly fatal prognosis [10]. Since the FIF grows within the host’s brain tissue, it leads to severe brain tissue compression and accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid, resulting in cranial hypertension. Our patient, who was placed in the Postoperative Intensive Care Unit for treatment after resection of an intracranial FIF and continued to have large epileptic seizures, presenting a state of unconsciousness. The family discontinued treatment 12 days after the operation.
Clinicians have difficulty differentiating mature teratomas from FIFs. It is debated whether a FIF is a distinct entity or a well-organized teratoma [23]. The 7 main distinguishing points between the two are as follows. (1) Because the FIF has axial bone, it indicates that it has entered the primitive notochord stage, whereas the teratoma has a small amount of bone. (2) A FIF is anatomically more distinct, has different degrees of development, and presents benign lesions. There are normally 3 germ layers in the teratoma, and the teratoma cannot form an entire organ system [24]. Teratoma is potentially malignant as well. (3) The FIF usually appears like a typical fetus, covered with skin, in an amniotic sac lined with epithelium or squamous epithelium [25]. The teratoma is characterized by multiple cystic cavities, poor tissue differentiation, and little to no forming tissue, such as hair, skin, or teeth. (4) Most FIFs were found in the abdominal cavity or retroperitoneum, followed by the sacrococcygeal tail or the thoracoabdominal wall, and fewer in the head and neck. Generally, teratomas occur in the lower abdomen, pelvic cavity, and sacrococcygeal tail. (5) Ultrasound images of FIFs show cystic solid mixed echo masses with clear boundaries and fine echoes in the cystic region. Ultrasonic differential diagnosis relies mainly on strong echoes detected from the mass, such as the long bone and skull, or visible cord-shaped blood flow signals [26]. Generally, teratomas present a mixed echo with a distinct boundary and envelope, a strong echo or no echo signal, dense spot hyperecho, and lipid stratification. Strong echo is mostly observed in the mass, nodule, or short line shape, with poorly differentiated organ and limb soft tissue. The envelope and inside of the teratoma cannot display blood flow signals, due to the lack of blood flow signals in color Doppler flow imaging. (6) During a CT examination, teratomas and endoparasites present mixed densities, including bone, soft tissue, fat, and fluid. However, the endoparasite exhibits long bones, vertebrae, skulls, and ribs. Using 3-dimensional recombination, a full picture of the bones and spine of the endoparasite was more clearly shown [27]. More than half of the masses are blood vessel-based. Finally, (7) the MRI revealed a large mass containing bone, highly differentiated tissues and organs, and a fat signal shadow. An under-calcified intervertebral disc enhanced the accuracy of the FIF diagnostic test [28].
Ultrasound during pregnancy is the preferred method for detecting a FIF, offering benefits such as being noninvasive, radiation-free, and easy to perform; however, the rate of successful prenatal diagnosis is below 20% [29]. MRI can provide more information than ultrasound, such as the anatomical location and tissue characteristics of the mass [30]. FIFs and teratomas can be differentiated with the help of CT examination, which is the main method for diagnosing FIFs. However, despite its radiation risk, CT is suitable for pre-surgery diagnosis [31] and it is not permitted for use during pregnancy.
The residue after removing the FIF has been reported to contain malignant changes [32]; in the present case, blood alpha-fetoprotein levels decreased significantly. Monitoring of tumor markers, such as alpha-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin, can be used for diagnosis, follow-up observation, and determination of a FIF cure [29,30], and long-term follow-up after surgery is recommended.
Conclusions
The occurrence of intracranial FIFs is exceedingly rare and requires prompt differential diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment. According to previous literature, we identified the key differences between FIF and teratoma from anatomical and imaging perspectives. A measurement of alpha-fetoprotein was performed after surgery to diagnose recurrences.
Figures
Figure 1.. Head of the child after anesthesia. Figure 2.. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) image of the head. CT reconstruction in the sagittal position showed a large mass in the cerebral hemisphere with a maximum diameter of 13 cm, clear and smooth boundary, and internal bone structure. Fetal shape was observed in multi slice, with obvious compression near the cerebral parenchyma, and hydrosis of both ventricles and the third ventricle. The arrow points to the long bone. Figure 3.. A finger-like limb (the white arrow) can be seen when the intracapsular membrane of the brain tissue was opened. Figure 4.. The fetal body can be seen, organs such as the mouth (green arrow), eyes (red arrow), trunk, forearm (blue arrow), and hand (white arrow) are visible. Figure 5.. Following brain tumor surgery, the intracranial and lateral ventricles in axial T1 and T2 images displayed flattened air and liquid, increased ventricle size, reduced brain parenchyma volume, and absence of brain tumors. Figure 6.. The spinal column (purple arrow) and long bone (white arrow) morphology were shown on magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus in fetu. Figure 7.. Squamous epithelium with hyperkeratosis. Figure 8.. Brown capsule fluid containing amniotic fluid. The white arrow shows amniotic epithelial cells.References:
1.. Mohan H, Chhabra S, Handa U, Fetus-in-fetu: A rare entity: Fetal Diagn Ther, 2007; 22(3); 195-97
2.. Gude D, Rayudu BR, Bansal D, Sashidhar C, Revisiting fetus-in-fetu: Ann Saudi Med, 2012; 32(4); 427-29
3.. Kumar A, Paswan SS, Kumar B, Kumar P, Fetus in fetu in an adult woman: BMJ Case Rep, 2019; 12(8); e230835
4.. Willis RA, The borderland of embryology and pathology: Bull NY Acad Med, 1950; 26(7); 440-60
5.. Shin JH, Yoon CH, Cho KS, Fetus-in-fetu in the scrotal sac of a newborn infant: imaging, surgical and pathological findings: Eur Radiol, 1999; 9(5); 945-47
6.. Thakral CL, Maji DC, Sajwani MJ, Fetus-in-fetu: A case report and review of the literature: J Pediatr Surg, 1998; 33(9); 1432-34
7.. Kim YJ, Sohn SH, Lee JY, Misdiagnosis of fetus-in-fetu as meconium peritonitis: Korean J Pediatr, 2011; 54(3); 133-36
8.. Tiwari C, Shah H, Kumbhar V, Fetus in fetu: Two cases and literature review: Dev Period Med, 2016; 20(3); 174-77
9.. Saito K, Katsumata Y, Hirabuki T, Fetus-in-fetu: Parasite or neoplasm? A study of two cases: Fetal Diagn Ther, 2007; 22(5); 383-88
10.. Traisrisilp K, Srisupundit K, Suwansirikul S, Intracranial fetus-in-fetu with numerous fully developed organs: J Clin Ultrasound, 2018; 46(7); 487-93
11.. Osama MA, Chatterjee P, Gupta A, Twin fetus-in-fetu: The story of an encaged twin: Fetal Pediatr Pathol, 2023; 42(3); 529-34
12.. Lewis RH, Foetus in foetu and the retroperitoneal teratoma: Arch Dis Child, 1961; 36(186); 220-26
13.. Juan Liang, Changlong Xu, Yanping Wang, Epidemiological survey of conjoined twins in China: Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 1999; 30(1); 56-58
14.. Zhu JZ, Zhang WX, Li YL, Pre-pregnancy consultation and prenatal ultrasound screening are the keys to prevent conjoined twins from malformation: Chinese Journal of Eugenics and Genetics, 2010; 18(5); 95-96+152
15.. Majhi AK, Saha K, Karmakar M, Fetus in fetu – a mystery in medicine: ScientificWorldJournal, 2007; 7; 252-57
16.. Hua QQ, Xie ZP, Jin SH, Ultrasound diagnostic value of conjoined twins in early pregnancy: Chinese Journal of Eugenics and Genetics, 2017; 25(1); 112 , 134
17.. Al-Yaqoubi HN, Fatema N, Al-Fahdi BS, A case of craniopagus parasiticus: An antenatal diagnosis by ultrasound screening at 16 weeks of gestation and a literature review of recently reported cases: Turk J Pediatr, 2019; 61(6); 941-45
18.. Escobar MA, Rossman JE, Caty MG, Fetus-in-fetu: Report of a case and a review of the literature: J Pediatr Surg, 2008; 43(5); 943-46
19.. Patankar T, Fatterpekar GM, Prasad S, Fetus in fetu: CT appearance – report of two cases: Radiology, 2000; 214(3); 735-37
20.. Hoeffel CC, Nguyen KQ, Phan HT, Fetus in fetu: A case report and literature review: Pediatrics, 2000; 105(6); 1335-44
21.. Parashari UC, Luthra G, Khanduri S, Diagnostic dilemma in a neglected case of fetus-in-fetu solved with magnetic resonance imaging and MDCT – a case report and review of the literature: J Radiol Case Rep, 2011; 5(10); 29-37
22.. Knox AJ, Webb AJ, The clinical features and treatment of fetus in fetu: Two case reports and a review of the literature: J Pediatr Surg, 1975; 10(4); 483-89
23.. Ji Y, Song B, Chen S, Fetus in fetu in the scrotal sac: Case report and literature review: Medicine (Baltimore), 2015; 94(32); e1322
24.. Zhang X, Ning J, A rare case of fetal retroperitoneal solid mature teratoma: Asian J Surg, 2023; 46(11); 4776-77
25.. Zheng XQ, Yan JY, Xu RL, A clinical analysis of the diagnosis and treatment of fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas: Cancer Manag Res, 2020; 12; 13185-93
26.. Yue M, Bao YJ, Wang H, Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of parasitic twins tire case: Chin J Obstet Gynecol, 2019(4); 269-70
27.. Wu PH, Xu F, Feng QF, One case: Three-dimensional reconstruction with 64-slice spiral CT in diagnosing fetus in the fetus: J Pract Radiol, 2013; 29(10); 1720-21
28.. Wu HY, Li H, Lu LW, CT features of the fetus in the fetus in children: Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2021; 37(5); 716-20
29.. Yang L, Song WY, Zheng MM, Neonatal sacrococcygeal fetus-in-fetu: A case report and literature review: Chin J Neonatol, 2021; 26(1); 46-50
30.. Hui PW, Lam TP, Chan KL, Lee CP, Fetus in fetu – from prenatal ultrasound and MRI diagnosis to postnatal confirmation: Prenat Diagn, 2007; 27(7); 657-61
31.. Lu T, Ma J, Yang X, A rare case of fetus in fetu in the sacrococcygeal region: CT and MRI findings: BMC Pediatr, 2021; 21(1); 575
32.. Hopkins KL, Dickson PK, Ball TI, Fetus-in-fetu with malignant recurrence: J Pediatr Surg, 1997; 32(10); 1476-79
Figures
In Press
Case report
Dual Hepatic Injury from Refeeding Syndrome and Starvation in a Malnourished Woman After Bariatric Surgery:...Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944088
Case report
Rapid Healing of Palatal Necrosis with Active Oxygen Gel: A Case Report and Management StrategyAm J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.945135
Case report
Late-Onset Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in a Lung Transplant Patient: A Case of T-Cell Post-Transplan...Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944761
Case report
Dantrolene for Control of Refractory Shivering in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case StudyAm J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944980
Most Viewed Current Articles
21 Jun 2024 : Case report 58,722
Intracranial Parasitic Fetus in a Living Infant: A Case Study with Surgical Intervention and Prognosis Anal...DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report 42,753
Neurocysticercosis Presenting as Migraine in the United StatesDOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133
10 Jan 2022 : Case report 32,479
A Report on the First 7 Sequential Patients Treated Within the C-Reactive Protein Apheresis in COVID (CACOV...DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935263
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935263
23 Feb 2022 : Case report 20,016
Penile Necrosis Associated with Local Intravenous Injection of CocaineDOI :10.12659/AJCR.935250
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250