Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

09 March 2012: Case Report  

Successful electrical cardioversion of supraventricular tachycardia in a pregnant patient

Fevzi Yılmaz , Inan Beydilli , Cemil Kavalcı , Serkan Yılmaz

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.882594

Am J Case Rep 2012; 13:33-35

0 Comments

Background

Cardiac arrhythmias are frequently seen during pregnancy. Among these, supraventricular arrhythmias are of great concern, especially when the patient is pregnant. Arrhythmias that occur during pregnancy are almost always benign and require no treatment [1]. Nonetheless, severe symptomatic arrhythmias require immediate and accurate management. Maternal arrhythmia incidence is expected to be 1.2 per 1000 in the pregnant population [2]. This article describes a case of supraventricular arrhythmia during pregnancy and its treatment with electrical cardioversion.

Case Report

A 32-year-old patient, 26 weeks pregnant, was admitted to the emergency department with mild chest pain and tachycardia lasting for an hour. She had an uncomplicated pregnancy with a history of thyroidectomy 3 years ago. She was on a daily 75 mg levothyroxine medication and had no previous history of cardiac or thrombo-embolic disease. Physical examination was normal except for a tachycardic pulse. Blood pressure was 110/70 mmHg and oxygen saturation was 98%. There was no peripheral edema. Anaemia and other systemic disorders were excluded. Tyroid function tests were within normal limits. There was no diameter difference between calves. The patient was not tachypneic. Her arterial blood gases revealed no hypoxemia and hypocarbia. Echocardiogram showed no structural abnormalities. The electrocardiographic record revealed a supraventricular tachycardia with a rate of 230 beats per minute (Figure 1).

Patient was monitored and hydrated and vagal maneuver was applied immediately, but the rhythm was resistant. Five mg of metoprolol was administered as a second step to control supraventricular rate, but there was no change in arrhythmia. Then after IV infusion of adenosine triphosphate 6 to 12 mg, the rhythm was resistant.

Due to persistence of arrhythmia, a fall in blood pressure to 60 mmHg systolic and 40 mmHg diastolic, and an altered state of consciousness, the patient was referred to a cardiologist. Synchronized cardioversion with 100 joules was performed and the patient’s rhythm was normalized to a sinus rhythm of 90 beats per minute (Figure 2). The patient was stabilized and admitted to the intensive care unit. Obstetric ultrasonography revealed a healthy fetus with normal cardiac activity.

Discussion

There are substantial changes in hormonal and hemodynamic states of pregnant women that may lead to arrhythmias [3,4]. Atrial and ventricular premature beats are frequent during pregnancy and are generally benign. Supraventricular tachycardias and malign ventricular arrhythmias are less frequent. Arrhythmias such as atrial, ventricular or nodal complex tachycardias, sinoatrial arrest, wandering atrial pacemaker, sinus tachycardia and paroxysmal ventricular tachycardias occur during pregnancy [5].

Supraventricular tachycardia is generally seen in women of reproductive age. Its relationship with pregnancy and mechanism of exacerbation are unclear, but a hyperdynamic state of pregnancy may be a key factor [5].

There is generally no need for drug therapy in supraventricular and ventricular premature beats,; however, potential stimulants like caffein and alcohol should be avoided. Acute treatment of arrhythmias in pregnant patients is similar to that of non-pregnant women, except for a few exceptional cases [4,5]. The first-line of treatments for benign arrhythmias are conservative approaches like observation, rest and vagal maneuvers. Drugs that have no fetal effects should be used in more severe and symptomatic arrhythmias. Drugs with relatively low risk and good tolerability should be preferred, as no antiarrhythmic drug is safe during pregnancy [1,3,6,7].

Arrhythmias disturbing hemodynamic stability should be treated due to potential harm to fetus as a result of maternal hypotension [5,7]. Adenosine is a safe and preferred drug in the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias in pregnancy. Digoxin is another choice for treatment of arrhythmias in pregnant patients [8,9]. Among the many medications used in the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias, only calcium channel blockers have tocolytic effects [10].

Electrical cardioversion is effective in the treatment of maternal supraventricular arrhythmias and should be used immediately when drugs fail [1,6,11]. Electrical cardioversion of 50–100 joules is indicated in the acute treatment of all patients with unstable hemodynamics [2,8] and the energy applied varies from 50 to 400 J [12]. However, 2 maternal deaths assumed to be due to electrical cardioversion have been reported [13,14]. Radiofrequency ablation of arrhythmogenic substrate, which has rarely been performed during pregnancy, is an effective treatment of drug-refractory maternal supraventricular tachycardias in advanced pregnancy [15].

Conclusions

Treatment of rhythm disturbances during pregnancy must be well justified. No antiarrhythmic drug is absolutely safe in pregnancy. Arrhythmias during pregnancy should initially be managed conservatively. Antiarrhythmics should be reserved for symptomatic cases. Electrical cardioversion is an effective method, with favorable tolerability.

References:

1.. Trappe HJ, Acute therapy of maternal and fetal arrhythmias during pregnancy: J Intensive Care Med, 2006; 21; 305-15, pmid: 16946446

2.. Tromp CH, Nanne AC, Pernet PJ, Electrical cardioversion during pregnancy: safe or not?: Neth Heart J, 2011; 19(3); 134-36, pmid: 21475392

3.. Robins K, Lyons G, Supraventricular tachycardia in pregnancy: Br J Anaesth, 2004; 92; 140-43, pmid: 14665567

4.. Wolbrette D, Treatment of arrhythmias during pregnancy: Curr Womens Health Rep, 2003; 3(2); 135-39, pmid: 12628083

5.. Gowda RM, Khan IA, Mehta NJ, Cardiac arrhythmias in pregnancy: clinical and therapeutic considerations: Int J Cardiol, 2003; 88; 129-33, pmid: 12714190

6.. Tan HL, Lie KI, Treatment of tachyarrhythmias during pregnancy and lactation: Eur Heart J, 2001; 22; 458-64, pmid: 11237540

7.. Chow T, Galvin J, McGovern B, Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in pregnancy and lactation: Am J Cardiol, 1998; 82(4A); 581-621

8.. Joglar JA, Page RL, Treatment of cardiac arrhythmias during pregnancy; safety considerations: Drug Saf, 1999; 20(1); 85-94, pmid: 9935279

9.. Hagley MT, Cole PL, Adenosine use in pregnant women with supravetricular tachycardia: Ann Pharmacother, 1994; 28(11); 1241-42, pmid: 7849336

10.. Ou KY, Yang CH, Tsai EM, Choosing calcium channel blockers for pregnant womwn with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and pre-term labor: a case report: Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2004; 20(9); 457-60, pmid: 15506559

11.. Barnes EJ, Eben F, Patterson D, Direct current cardioversion during pregnancy should be performed with facilities available for fetal monitoring and emergency caesarean section: BJOG, 2002; 109; 1406-7, pmid: 12504980

12.. Paziaud O, Piot O, Rousseau J, Predictive criteria of early recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after reduction by electrical cardioversion: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, 2003; 96; 1169-74, pmid: 15248442

13.. Klepper I, Cardioversion in late pregnancy. The anaesthetic management of a case of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: Anaesthesia, 1981; 36; 611-16, pmid: 7270830

14.. Meitus ML, Fetal electrocardiography and cardioversion with direct current countershock. Report of a case: Dis Chest, 1965; 48; 324-25, pmid: 5890523

15.. Bombelli F, Lagona F, Salvati A, Radiofrequency catheter ablation in drug refractory maternal supraventricular tachycardias in advanced pregnancy: Obstet Gynecol, 2003; 102(5 Pt 2); 1171-73, pmid: 14607046

In Press

Case report  China

Thrombolytic Therapy After Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients With STEMI From Medically Underdev...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976  

Case report  Greece

Multilevel Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Low Back Pain in Achondroplasia: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290  

Case report  Italy

Fractional CO₂ Laser (SCAR3 Scanner) for a Hypertrophic Retracting Cleft Lip Scar: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607  

Case report  Saudi Arabia

Postoperative Corneal Dellen Following PreserFlo MicroShunt: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985  

Most Viewed Current Articles

07 Dec 2021 : Case report  USA 17,691,734

Edwardsiella tarda: A Classic Presentation of a Rare Fatal Infection, with Possible New Background Risk Fac...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347

06 Dec 2021 : Case report  Brazil 164,491

Lipedema Can Be Treated Non-Surgically: A Report of 5 Cases

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406

21 Jun 2024 : Case report  China (mainland) 113,090

Intracranial Parasitic Fetus in a Living Infant: A Case Study with Surgical Intervention and Prognosis Anal...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371

0:00

07 Mar 2024 : Case report  USA 59,175

Neurocysticercosis Presenting as Migraine in the United States

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923