02 October 2013: Case Report
Double superior vena cava on fistulogram: A case report and discussion
Rare disease, Congenital defects / diseases, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Chad J. Cooper ABCDEF , Anwar Soliman Gerges BDEF , Emmanuel Anekwe BDEF , German T. Hernandez BDEFDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.889589
Am J Case Rep 2013; 14:395-397
Background
The superior vena cava (SVC) is a large vein that delivers deoxygenated blood from the upper half of the body to the right atrium. It is formed by the left and right brachiocephalic veins. Superior vena cava anomalies are rare occurrences caused by variations in the development of the embryonic thoracic venous system. Many anatomical variations could be possible due to the complex nature of these developmental stages. The anomalies that involve the superior vena cava include the persistent left superior vena cava with or without the right superior vena cava, absence of superior vena cava, hypoplasia of the superior vena cava, and abnormal opening of the superior vena cava into the left atrium, coronary sinus, azygous venous system, and the pulmonary vein [1]. The presence of double superior vena cava can be alone or with other congenital anomalies. Some of the conditions that have been described include horseshoe kidney, absence of left brachiocephalic vein, univentricular heart, double coronary sinus, conduction tissue anomalies, common atrium, atrioseptal defect, transposition of great vessels, and dextrocardia [1].
A double superior vena cava with a persistent left superior vena cava is rarely encountered but is the most common venous anomaly in the setting of SVC, with a frequency of between 0.3% and 1.3%, and it usually drains into the coronary sinus [2]. Double SVC is usually asymptomatic unless other cardiac anomalies exist. The incidence of double SVC in the general population is 0.3% whereas in patients with an associated congenital heart disease it varies between 10–11% [3]. The majority of cases are clinically silent and are diagnosed incidentally by imaging done for other reasons.
Case Report
We hereby present a 50 year old female with a history of end stage renal disease who has been recently started on dialysis. She has a left upper fistula but was advised to seek our care due to difficult cannulation. A fistulogram, PermaCath placement and angiogram of internal jugular vein were performed. The angiogram revealed a good sized cephalic vein that is wide open and mild to moderate stenosis at the subclavian area which later proved to be a double superior vena cava (Figure 1). Afterwards, a PermaCath was placed in the right internal jugular. No other cardiac anomalies were found. No complications occurred during the procedure.
Discussion
The gold standard for the definitive diagnosis of double SVC is usually discovered with invasive angiography. A double SVC may also be incidentally diagnosed at surgery or autopsy and may be a cause of widened mediastinum on chest radiography. When encountered there should be an investigation of other possible congenital defects should be sought with echocardiogram, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or a CT scan. A double superior vena cava may make it difficult for internal jugular or subclavian venous catheterization, radiofrequency ablation, pacemaker insertion or coronary artery bypass graft [4]. If a right to left shunt is present then cyanosis, sepsis and cerebral abscess may possibly occur.
When a double superior vena cava is ascertained by these diagnostic techniques and if other congenital anomalies are discovered then comprehension of the risks related to catheterization and selection of a safe route should be considered [5]. A double SVC may account for aberrant appearances while positioning a central venous catheter placed from the left side of the body. It is safer to have a definite venous access with the help of ultrasound guidance. The injection of contrast will help delineate the venous anatomy when a variation in the venous anatomy is suspected [6].
Conclusions
Double SVC is a rare congenital anomaly. The literature available on this congenital anomaly is sparse. The majority of cases are diagnosed incidentally on imaging for other reasons, which can alert the physician of other congenital abnormalities that will need further work up. However, these venous anomalies should be recognized, as they can have significant clinical implications, especially during central venous catheter placement or during surgical procedures in the chest.
References:
1. Fabian FM, Gesase AP, Ngassapa DN, Double superior vena cava presenting with anomalous jugular and azygous venous systems: Indian Heart J, 2008; 60; 352-58, pmid: 19242016
2. Chen M, Ji Ma, Xu G, Ying Z, Double superior vena cava with a persistent left superior vena cava: The Japanese Society of Intern Med, 2008; 47; 679-80
3. Albay S, Cankal F, Kocabiyik N, Double superior vena cava: Morphologie, 2006; 90; 39-42, pmid: 16929820
4. Arguder E, Celenk MK, Gumus B, Koksal A, A case with double vena cava superior discovered during the investigating of persistent cough: Tuberk Toraks, 2012; 60; 199-200, pmid: 22779945
5. Limura A, Oguchi T, Shibata M, Double superior vena cava and anomaly of cardiovascular system with a review of the literature: Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn, 2011; 88; 37-42, pmid: 21882595
6. Brown R, Shyamkumar NK, Double superior vena cava with a persistent left superior vena cava: an incidental finding during peripherally inserted central catheter placement: Australas Radiol, 2007; 51; B257-59, pmid: 17991079
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






