16 December 2015: Articles
Prenatal Diagnosis of Antley-Bixler Syndrome and POR Deficiency
Challenging differential diagnosis, Unusual setting of medical care, Rare disease, Congenital defects / diseases, Clinical situation which can not be reproduced for ethical reasons
Elena Oldani ABEF , Catherine Garel DF , Martine Bucourt BD , Lionel Carbillon ABEFDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.895526
Am J Case Rep 2015; 16:882-885
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prenatal diagnosis of severe bone diseases is challenging and requires complete and precise analysis of fetal anomalies to guide genetic investigation and parental counselling.
CASE REPORT: We report a rare case of Antley-Bixler syndrome prenatally diagnosed at 26 weeks’ gestation by ultrasound and computed tomography in a 28-year-old woman with a history of early termination of pregnancy for “malposition of the inferior limbs”. The prenatal ultrasound scan showed severe femoral bowing and frontal bossing. Taking into account the high probability of a recurrent severe skeletal disorder, a computed tomography (CT) scan was proposed. CT findings revealed bilateral femora deformation, craniosynostosis, severe midface hypoplasia, and radiohumeral synostosis. These anomalies strongly suggested Antley-Bixler syndrome. Sequencing of the POR gene in the fetus and the parents revealed compound heterozygous mutations in exon 9 and intron 7, both inherited from each parent, and this finding allowed genetic counseling.
CONCLUSIONS: The first step in the proper prenatal diagnosis of fetal bone disorders is the precise analysis of ultrasonographic images. However, when a severe fetal inherited disorder is strongly suspected in late mid-trimester, CT may be discussed and usefully contribute to diagnosis and prognosis assessment.
Keywords: Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System - genetics, Antley-Bixler Syndrome Phenotype - embryology, DNA Mutational Analysis, Diagnosis, Differential, Fatal Outcome, Fetal Diseases - diagnosis, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Mutation, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis - methods, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Background
The extensive ultrasound workup of fetal skeletal anomalies may be a challenge for prenatal diagnosis, because ultra-sound may overlook specific features of constitutional skeletal diseases. Although the first step and most important factor in the proper diagnosis of fetal bone disorders is the precise analysis of detailed ultrasonographic images in order to avoid the mother and the fetus being unnecessarily exposed to radiation, computed tomography (
Case Report
A 28-year-old woman was referred to our prenatal diagnosis center after “malposition of the inferior limbs” was found on first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. In a first pregnancy with the same healthy, non-consanguineous partner, a termination had been decided on at the end of the first trimester because of “inferior limb anomalies”, without any definite diagnosis. Second-trimester fetal ultrasound confirmed severe bilateral femoral bowing, and showed a receding midface. On the other hand, the ribs were of normal size, no visceral anomalies were observed, amniotic fluid amount was normal, and a normal female karyotype was found. 3D ultrasound did not contribute usefully to the diagnosis. Because of severe skeletal anomaly recurrence without any definite diagnosis,
Discussion
The most suggestive feature of
Conclusions
When a recurrence of severe skeletal disorder is strongly suspected in a fetus during late mid-trimester, and the diagnosis and prognosis are still in question after acquisition of highly detailed ultrasound images, the precise analysis of family history and the combination of computed tomography with detailed assessment of ultrasound images can help in accurate prenatal diagnosis. In this difficult context, appropriate genetic counseling is essential in parental decision-making.
References:
1.. Macé G, Sonigo P, Cormier-Daire V, Three-dimensional helical computed tomography in prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasia: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013; 42; 161-68, pmid: 22945478
2.. Victoria T, Epelman M, Coleman BG, Low-dose fetal CT in the prenatal evaluation of skeletal dysplasias and other severe skeletal abnormalities: Am J Roentgenol, 2013; 200; 989-1000, pmid: 23617480
3.. Miyazaki O, Sawai H, Murotsuki J, Nationwide radiation dose survey of computed tomography for fetal skeletal dysplasias: Pediatr Radiol, 2014; 44; 971-79, pmid: 24737001
4.. Antley R, Bixler D, Trapezoidocephaly, mid facial hypoplasia and cartilage abnormalities with multiple synostoses and skeletal fractures: Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser, 1975; 11; 397-401, pmid: 1227559
5.. Bottero L, Cinalli G, Labrune P, Antley-Bixler syndrome. Description of two new cases and a review of the literature: Childs Nerv Syst, 1997; 13; 275-80, pmid: 9224917
6.. Adolphs N, Klein M, Haberl EJ, Antley-Bixler-syndrome – staged management of craniofacial malformations from birth to adolescence – a case report: J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2011; 39; 487-95, pmid: 21146417
7.. Lopez-Rangel E, Van Allen MI, Prenatal exposure to fluconazole: an identifiable dysmorphic phenotype: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol, 2005; 73; 919-23, pmid: 16265639
8.. Savoldelli G, Schinzel A, Prenatal ultrasound detection of humero-radial synostosis in a case of Antley Bixler syndrome: Prenat Diagn, 1982; 2; 219-23, pmid: 7145849
9.. Machado LE, Osborne NG, Bonilla-Musoles F, Antley Bixler syndrome: Report of a case: J Ultrasound Med, 2001; 20; 73-77, pmid: 11149533
10.. Carter CO, Till K, Fraser V, Coffey R, A family study of craniosynostosis, with probable recognition of a distinct syndrome: J Med Genet, 1982; 19; 280-85, pmid: 7120316
11.. Chun K, Siegel-Bartelt J, Chitayat D, Phillips J, Ray PN, FGFR2 mutation associated with clinical manifestations consistent with Antley Bixler syndrome: Am J Med Genet, 1998; 77; 219-24, pmid: 9605588
12.. Reardon W, Smith A, Honour JW, Evidence for digenic inheritance in some cases of Antley Bixler syndrome: J Med Genet, 2000; 37; 26-32, pmid: 10633130
13.. Flück CE, Tajima T, Pandey AV, Mutant P450 oxidoreductase causes disordered steroidogenesis with and without Antley-Bixler syndrome: Nat Genet, 2004; 36; 228-30, pmid: 14758361
14.. Huang N, Pandey AV, Agrawal V, Diversity and function of mutations in p450 oxidoreductase in patients with Antley-Bixler syndrome and disordered steroidogenesis: Am J Hum Genet, 2005; 76; 729-49, pmid: 15793702
15.. Ko JM, Cheon CK, Kim GH, Yoo HW, A case of Antley-Bixler syndrome caused by compound heterozygous mutations of the cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase gene: Eur J Pediatr, 2009; 168; 877-80, pmid: 18853185
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






