21 February 2019: Articles
Kommerell Diverticulum: Right Aortic Arch with Anomalous Origin of Left Subclavian Artery and Duplicity of Right Vertebral Artery in a 16-Year-Old Girl
Challenging differential diagnosis, Unusual setting of medical care, Rare disease
João V. Silveira D 1*, Flavia P. Junqueira D 2, Cylmara G. Silveira D 3, Fernanda M. Consolim-Colombo DE 4,5DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.912053
Am J Case Rep 2019; 20:228-232
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Kommerell diverticulum with a right-sided aortic arch is a rare congenital anatomical condition most often observed in adults. A possible etiology of the subclavian artery’s anomalous origin would be an abnormality in regression of the fourth primitive aortic arch during embryonic development.
CASE REPORT: We report on the case of a 16-year-old female patient presenting with complaints of occasional tachycardia and mild non-specific dyspnea after anxiety crises. Physical examination revealed lower amplitude of the pulses in the left upper limb compared to the right upper limb, and difference in blood pressure (BP) values of 80×60 mmHg, and 100×60 mmHg, respectively. Different radiological imaging modalities were performed to elucidate a possible vascular abnormality. Multislice detector computed tomography angiography of the thoracic aorta and supra-aortic trunks showed a right-sided aortic arch and an aberrant origin of the left subclavian artery with a retroesophageal course and dilation of its emergence (Kommerell diverticulum), as well as duplicity of the right vertebral artery (RVA). Considering the actual small diameter of the diverticulum and the absence of dysphagia or severe external esophageal compression analyzed by the esophagogram, vascular surgery was not indicated. Since complications have been described in the literature, the patient must be kept under observation in the future.
CONCLUSIONS: Congenital vascular alterations, including Kommerell diverticulum with right-sided aortic arch and the aberrant origin of the left subclavian artery, should be suspected in otherwise asymptomatic young patients with few clinical manifestations. Investigation with different imaging methods helps to clarify the vascular abnormalities, to support a possible surgical procedure indication, and to monitor the patients in follow-up.
Keywords: Angiography, Aorta, Thoracic, Deglutition Disorders, Diverticulum, Subclavian Artery, Adolescent, computed tomography angiography, multidetector computed tomography, Vertebral Artery
Background
Kommerell diverticulum with a right-sided aortic arch is a rare congenital anatomical condition most often observed in adults. It can result from dilation of the anomalous origin of the subclavian artery in the following situations: left aortic arch (LAA) with anomalous origin of right subclavian artery (RSCA) (0.5–2.0%), or right aortic arch (RAA) with anomalous origin of the left subclavian artery (LSCA) (0.05–0.1%) [1,2].
A possible etiology of the subclavian artery’s anomalous origin is an abnormality in regression of the fourth primitive aortic arch during embryonic development [3]. This condition was named Kommerell diverticulum in honor of Dr. Kommerell, the radiologist who first made the diagnosis [4]. Anatomical changes are usually not associated with clinical symptoms, and the diagnosis of Kommerell diverticulum typically occurs incidentally during adulthood [3]. In some situations, especially when there is a right aortic arch and left subclavian artery, the diverticulum may be associated with dysphagia and dyspnea due to tracheal and/or esophageal compression, which directly influence the clinical and surgical treatment of this pathology. This case report demonstrates a variant of Kommerell diverticulum with a right aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery, associated with another vascular congenital anatomic variation – the duplicity of the right vertebral artery (RVA).
Case Report
We report the case of a 16-year-old female patient presenting with complaints of occasional tachycardia and mild non-specific dyspnea after anxiety crises. Physical examination revealed lower amplitude of the pulses in the left upper limb (LUL) compared to the right upper limb (RUL), and a difference in blood pressure (BP) values: BP RUL 100×60 mmHg and BP LUL 80×60 mmHg.
The electrocardiogram was within normal range, and 24-h Holter monitoring showed no arrhythmia.
The transthoracic color Doppler echocardiography (Echo) revealed a right aortic arch (Figure 1) with emergence of a vascular structure, and a three-phase pulsed pattern flow in the infra-aortic region on the right, suggestive of an aberrant subclavian artery.
A 16-multislice detector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) of the thoracic aorta and supra-aortic trunks was obtained using standard protocols with 1-mm collimation during the venous administration of iodinated nonionic contrast. This was followed by multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstructions using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and volume-rendering techniques (VRT) (Figures 2–4), which demonstrated the presence of RAA, causing a mild impression on the right lateral border and a mild leftward displacement of the trachea. MDCTA also showed the aberrant origin of the LSCA, with a retroesophageal course and dilation of its emergence – Kommerell diverticulum – as well as duplicity of RVA.
The patient underwent upper digestive endoscopy, which showed a slight extrinsic compression in the middle third of the esophagus, and a contrast radiographic study of the esophagus (barium esophagram) that showed a discrete esophageal impression by the RAA (Figure 5).
Vascular surgery was not indicated considering the actual diameter of the diverticulum and the absence of dysphagia or severe external esophageal compression shown by the esophagogram. Since complications have been described in the literature, the patient was kept under observation. There was spontaneous disappearance of dyspnea and tachycardia, and no new symptoms appeared. The patient remains without medication and is in clinical follow-up.
Discussion
Kommerell diverticulum can be defined as a bulb-like swelling of the proximal portion of an aberrant left subclavian artery, adjacent to its aortic origin. It is a rare condition, which can occur with either the LAA and RSCA aberrant origin (0.5–2% of the population) or with the RAA and LSCA aberrant origin (0.05–0.1% of the population) [1].
One of the classifications described in the literature reports that the aortic diverticulum is located at the aorto-ductal junction, perceived as a bulge along the internal portion of the aortic isthmus distal to the LSCA [3]. Another classification describes the persistent proximal portion of the dorsal aorta as the result of the formation of a Kommerell diverticulum [5].
Literature reviews have found Kommerell diverticulum to be present in up to 100% of patients with a RAA and an aberrant LSCA diagnosed by routine CT examination, and about 60% of patients with an aberrant subclavian artery, the most common aberrant artery on the left side, have a Kommerell diverticulum [6]. The location of the diverticulum is posterior to the esophagus in 80% of cases, between the trachea and the esophagus in 15% of cases, and anterior to the trachea in 5% of cases [7]. One explanation for the anomalous origin of the RAA is given by the diagram of Rathke’s pouch, which consists of an embryological malformation with remodeling of the 6th ventral and dorsal arches during the 4th and 5th weeks of embryonic life [8].
The patient in this report presented with an RAA from an aberrant LSCA origin. These genetic abnormalities are usually discovered incidentally during routine imaging tests, but it is very important to diagnose the symptomatic forms early. RAA is diagnosed in about 0.1% of the general population, and about 50% of these individuals have an aberrant LSCA origin [9]. An abnormal LSCA origin can occur without any concurrent anomaly; however, it is more commonly associated with RAA [10].
Some authors report that an RAA without a simultaneous congenital heart defect is extremely rare [11]. In 5–10% of cases, it is related to congenital heart diseases, including tetralogy of Fallot, pulmonary stenosis with ventricular septal defect, tricuspid atresia, and patent ductus arteriosus [11]. In patients with these anomalies, the aberrant subclavian arteries usually have a course posterior to the esophagus towards the contra-lateral upper limb, but our patient did not have cardiac congenital abnormalities associated with RAA and aberrant LSCA. Other authors have reported that RAA with an aberrant LSCA should always have a left ductus arteriosus that can form a vascular ring connecting the left pulmonary artery to the aberrant LSCA origin [1]. This vascular ring causes tracheal compression, and when there is no compression or tracheal deformity, the ring may not be present; if it is, it does not need to be corrected [1,5].
Most patients do not show any symptoms, and the diagnosis is made incidentally in imaging studies obtained for other non-related reasons [5]. Progressive symptoms related to compression of the esophagus (dysphagia) or trachea (stridor) may be observed in cases with large dilatations or with localized diver-ticula at specific sites [6]. Cardiovascular symptoms can also occur as a result of associated structural cardiac malformations, early atherosclerotic lesions, or abnormal artery dissection [5]. Our patient’s complaints were mostly associated with anxiety episodes, and they disappeared spontaneously during the initial follow-up. Thus, after evaluation with specific tests, they were considered unrelated to structural vascular disease.
The only physical sign found in this patient was a discreet difference in pulse and systolic BP between the RUL and LUL, which may be related to the aberrant origin of the LSCA. With the supine position of the LUL, the absence of arterial pulse has been described previously [3]. Although our patient presented with RAA, causing a mild impression on the trachea and an aberrant LSCA with a retroesophageal course, she had no symptoms such as dysphagia, chest pain, or stridor.
The key surgical indication occurs when the Kommerell diver-ticulum presents with a diameter greater than 5 cm in symptomatic patients; in such a situation, complications such as tracheomalacia, esophageal dilation, or rupture of the aneurysm may occur [12]. As the diverticulum of our patient was 15×13 mm in diameter, it was considered small, and the medical decision was to maintain periodic clinical follow-up.
Abnormal findings were observed by transthoracic Echo, MDCT of the thoracic aorta, and contrasted radiographic esophageal study of the patient. These tests were important for a comprehensive understanding of the vascular anatomy and its relationships with adjacent structures, as well as to verify concomitant cardiac structural alterations.
Kommerell diverticulum with a right-sided aortic arch is a rare congenital anatomical condition in which clinical progression is not completely established. Complications may occur, which depend on the anatomical distribution of local structures, the size, and the extent of the aneurysm. Greater fragility this vascular alteration and more extensive lesions are associated with occurrence with more adverse consequences such as thromboses, dissections, and ruptures. Magnetic angio-resonance can be used as an imaging method not only for diagnosis, but also in outpatient follow-up, since it does not use ionizing radiation or iodinated contrast for image acquisition.
Conclusions
Congenital vascular alterations, including Kommerell diver-ticulum with right-sided aortic arch and the aberrant origin of the left subclavian artery, may be suspected in otherwise asymptomatic young patients with few clinical manifestations. Investigation with different imaging methods helps to clarify the vascular abnormalities, to support a possible surgical procedure indication, and to monitor the follow-up of the patients.
References:
1.. Mubarak MY, Right-sided aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery from Kommerell’s diverticulum: Iran J Radiol, 2011; 8(2); 103-6, pmid: 23329925
2.. Yang MH, Weng ZC, Weng YG, Chang HH, A right-sided aortic arch with Kommerell’s diverticulum of the aberrant left subclavian artery presenting with syncope: J Chin Med Assoc, 2009; 72(5); 275-77, pmid: 19467953
3.. Arazińska A, Polguj M, Szymczyk K, Right aortic arch analysis – Anatomical variant or serious vascular defect?: BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2017; 17(1); 102, pmid: 28420337
4.. Tanaka A, Milner R, Ota T, Kommerell’s diverticulum in the current era: A comprehensive review: Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015; 63(5); 245-59, pmid: 25636900
5.. Rosa P, Gillespie DL, Goff JM, Aberrant right subclavian artery syndrome: A case of chronic cough: J Vasc Surg, 2003; 37(6); 1318-21, pmid: 12764282
6.. Ota T, Okada K, Takanashi S, Surgical treatment for Kommerell’s diverticulum: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2006; 131(3); 574-78, pmid: 16515907
7.. Cina CS, Althani H, Pasenau J, Abouzahr L, Kommerell’s diverticulum and right-sided aortic arch: A cohort study and review of the literature: J Vasc Surg, 2004; 39(1); 131-39, pmid: 14718830
8.. Backer CL, Hillman N, Mavroudis C, Holinger LD, Resection of Kommerell’s diverticulum and left subclavian artery transfer for recurrent symptoms after vascular ring division: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002; 22(1); 64-69, pmid: 12103375
9.. Barr JG, Sepehripour AH, Jarral OA, A review of the surgical management of right-sided aortic arch aneurysms: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2016; 23(1); 156-62, pmid: 27001673
10.. Kouchoukos NT, Masetti P, Aberrant subclavian artery and Kommerell aneurysm: Surgical treatment with a standard approach: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007; 133(4); 888-92, pmid: 17382621
11.. Ahmadi A, Sonbolestan SA, A rare anomalous origin of left subclavian artery from the circle of Willis in combination with right sided aortic arch: A case report: ARYA Atheroscler, 2013; 9(5); 303-5, pmid: 24302940
12.. Haponiuk I, Paczkowski K, Chojnicki M, Reconstruction of the left-sided brachiocephalic trunk after vascular ring operation in left-handed child with Kommerell’s diverticulum: Postępy Kardiol Interwencyjnej, 2013; 9(2); 146-49, pmid: 24570707
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






