18 November 2019: Articles
Port-Site Implantation Diagnosed by Iodine-131 Post-Ablation Single-Photon Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography After Robotic Thyroidectomy: A Case Report
Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Clinical situation which can not be reproduced for ethical reasons
Mi Ra Kim ABCDEF 1, Sunmi Jo ABCDEF 2, Hye-kyung Shim ABCDEF 3*DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.920451
Am J Case Rep 2019; 20:1695-1698
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Robotic thyroidectomy using remote access approaches is currently regarded as the optimal surgical protocol for highly selected patients. This approach has excellent cosmetic outcomes compared with conventional open transcervical thyroidectomy. Although the remote access approach offers significant benefits, it can cause complications associated with the large working space required for surgery. Such complications can lead to unusual imaging findings.
CASE REPORT: We report a case of a 37-year-old woman with thyroid cancer who underwent robotic thyroidectomy and demonstrated unusual port-site implantation findings on post-treatment iodine-131 whole-body scintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography. Evaluation of stimulated thyroglobulin and additional imaging studies did not reveal any remarkable findings. Through a multidisciplinary discussion, we discovered that the bag had developed a tear during specimen retrieval. Our patient was administered a therapeutic dose of radioiodine, which accumulated within the target area and successfully ablated the implanted tissue. Follow-up imaging and biochemical studies were normal after a follow-up period of 7 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Port-site seeding is a rare and unexpected surgical complication; however, it can be treated with radioiodine therapy involving a therapeutic dose. Meticulous surgical manipulation is essential to prevent port-site implantation related to spillage and tearing of thyroid or cancer tissue. Awareness and identification of these rare complications, which manifest as unusual imaging findings, are critical for improving the accuracy of interpretation.
Keywords: Positron-Emission Tomography, Thyroidectomy, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Whole Body Imaging, Iodine Radioisotopes, Neoplasm Seeding, Robotic Surgical Procedures
Background
Thyroid cancer is one of the most common neoplasms occurring in young women. Given the sex of the patients and their youth at the time of initial diagnosis and surgery, avoiding an anterior neck scar is an important consideration. Over the past 2 decades, surgeries have been advanced to improve the satisfaction of patients and minimize or avoid visible neck scarring. These advanced approaches range from minimally invasive techniques to the remote access thyroidectomy technique using an endoscope or a robot [1,2]. In recent times, endoscopic or robotic remote access thyroidectomy using the axillary, breast, anterior chest wall, postauricular facelift, or transoral approach has gained considerable popularity, along with the significant advancement and development of newer state-of-the-art surgical procedures and instruments [3,4]. Robotic thyroidectomy performed by experienced surgeons is feasible and has several advantages over conventional open thyroidectomy, such as an excellent cosmetic outcome with a similar complication rate; however, it should only be performed in highly selected patients, and requires extensive dissection to create a working space for the surgery, more time, and learning periods for overcoming technical difficulties [2,5–7]. Consequently, unexpected complications that may result in unusual imaging findings can occur [8].
Radioiodine therapy and radioiodine whole-body scintigraphy (WBS) have been widely used as therapeutic regimens for over half a century. Imaging studies, including single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT), 18F fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), and ultrasonography (US) are of considerable value in differential diagnosis when unexpected findings are encountered on WBS after robotic thyroidectomy. Here, we present the rare findings of iodine-131 (I-131) WBS and SPECT-CT along the port site after robotic thyroidectomy in a woman with concurrent follicular and papillary thyroid cancers.
Case Report
A 37-year-old woman with a follicular thyroid nodule in the left thyroid lobe underwent left lobectomy using the robot-assisted bilateral axillo-breast approach. A frozen biopsy did not reveal any malignancy. However, a 1.7-cm follicular carcinoma with microscopic extrathyroidal extension and vascular invasion was pathologically confirmed. Completion thyroidectomy was performed using the same surgical procedure 4 months later. A 0.12-cm incidental papillary carcinoma confined to the right thyroid lobe was detected during this surgery.
Three months later, 481-MBq radioiodine therapy using levothyroxine withdrawal was administered. Multiple areas of unusual radioiodine uptake were observed in the central neck and left upper chest area on WBS. We performed additional SPECT-CT to identify the exact anatomical locations; this revealed that the area of unusual uptake was located along the left axillary subcutaneous tunnel and in the residual thyroid tissue on the thyroidectomy bed (Figure 1A–1C). After discussion with a multidisciplinary team, we discovered that the surgical bag had developed a tear during retrieval of the wrapped thyroidectomy specimen through the narrow transaxillary subcutaneous tunnel during surgery. We speculated that the lesions were caused by thyroid tissue implantation associated with thyroid capsule rupture and cancer microseeding.
The serum thyroid-stimulating hormone, stimulated thyroglobulin (Tg), and thyroglobulin antibody levels were 28.5 uIU/mL (normal range 0.3–5.0 uIU/ml), 2.45 ng/mL (0.90–1.80 ng/dl), and 10.99 U/mL (∼60 U/ml), respectively. There were no abnormal hypermetabolic lesions suggestive of malignancy on PET-CT. Follow-up US of the neck performed 2 months later was completely normal. I-123 WBS also showed no residual thyroid tissue or seeding lesions 1 year later. The serum Tg level decreased to 0.22 ng/mL with levothyroxine withdrawal. Even though the possibility of the initial tumor microseeding could not be definitely excluded by these parameters, the unusual lesions disappeared after radioiodine therapy. There was no definite evidence of local recurrence in these areas after a follow-up period of 7 years.
Discussion
Differentiated thyroid malignancy includes papillary and follicular carcinomas and accounts for approximately 90% cases of thyroid cancer [9]. It is extremely uncommon to have 2 concurrent primary cancers within the same thyroid gland. This case was histopathologically reported as the combination of papillary and follicular carcinomas, which has been reported in only a few of cases [10]. A collision tumor is defined as the coexistence of 2 adjacent but histologically distinct and independent malignant tumors in the same thyroid, without histological admixture [10]. Collision tumors can occur in various organs such as the ovaries, colon, lung, stomach, skin, and kidneys, but they are extremely rare in the thyroid [11]. It has also been suggested that each malignant component should be treated as an independent primary tumor [12].
Robotic thyroidectomy has significant advantages, including excellent cosmetic outcomes, a magnified surgical view, and rapid postoperative recovery. Despite these positive aspects, its complications and limitations include restrictive surgical indications, the requirement of a large working space, and port-site seeding [1,2]. Complications such as port-site seeding and recurrence have been reported in association with malignances involving the colon, ovaries, adrenal glands, and bladder [8,13–16]. The chances of direct tumor spillage during robotic thyroid surgery are high because of the friability of the thyroid tissue and the small working space available during surgery. The mechanism of tissue or tumor spread at the site of trocar insertion during laparoscopic surgery remains unknown [17,18], although one hypothesis states that implantation along the port tunneling site is caused by the surgical specimen during the surgeon’s manipulation, rather than other factors such as the gas used and the biological properties of the tumor [19]. Reports of rare cases have documented thyroid cancer recurrence around the operative bed and subcutaneous tunnel after endoscopic thyroidectomy [20,21], as well as tunnel-site seeding of normal thyroidal tissue on post-therapy WBS [22,23]. In one case, the original lesion was diagnosed as benign nodular hyperplasia after surgery, but multiple recurrent nodules were discovered along the subcutaneous tunnels [20]. The important inference from all of these observations is that careful manipulation of the pathological thyroidal tissue and packing of the resected specimen during retrieval are necessary to prevent rupture or spillage.
Accidental spillage of the specimen during bag removal was evident in the present case, and the pattern of unusual uptake on post-treatment WBS and SPECT-CT represented a seeding accident along the tunnel site. Although we did not objectively verify these areas, the patient was administered a radioiodine capsule at a therapeutic dose, which successfully accumulated within the target area. No evidence of recurrence or metastasis was observed on various laboratory and imaging studies during a follow-up period of 7 years.
Conclusions
This report documents rare findings of port-site implantation demonstrated by WBS and SPECT-CT after robotic thyroid surgery. We should consider the surgical procedures performed and correlate them with any unusual imaging manifestations to ensure better interpretation of these findings and accurate management. Port-site seeding is a rare and unexpected surgical complication; however, it can be treated with radioiodine therapy involving a therapeutic dose. Nevertheless, surgeons should be careful during surgical manipulations in order to prevent complications arising from the tearing and spillage of fragile thyroid or cancer tissue.
References:
1.. Hinson AM, Kandil E, O’Brien S, Trends in Robotic Thyroid Surgery in the United States from 2009 through 2013: Thyroid, 2015; 25(8); 919-26, pmid: 26061477
2.. Tae K, Ji YB, Song CM, Ryu J, Robotic and endoscopic thyroid surgery: Evolution and advances: Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2019; 12(1); 1-11, pmid: 30196688
3.. Lee KE, Kim HY, Park WS, Postauricular and axillary approach endoscopic neck surgery: A new technique: World J Surg, 2009; 33(4); 767-72, pmid: 19198933
4.. Ikeda Y, Takami H, Tajima G, Total endoscopic thyroidectomy: Axillary or anterior chest approach: Biomed Pharmacother, 2002; 56(Suppl. 1); 72s-78s, pmid: 12487257
5.. Perrier ND, Randolph GW, Inabnet WB, Robotic thyroidectomy: A framework for new technology assessment and safe implementation: Thyroid, 2010; 20(12); 1327-32, pmid: 21114381
6.. Jackson NR, Yao L, Tufano RP, Kandil EH, Safety of robotic thyroidectomy approaches: Meta-analysis and systematic review: Head Neck, 2014; 36(1); 137-43, pmid: 23471784
7.. Kandil E, Hammad AY, Walvekar RR, Robotic thyroidectomy versus non-robotic approaches: A meta-analysis examining surgical outcomes: Surg Innov, 2016; 23(3); 317-25, pmid: 26525401
8.. Al-Saif OH, Sengupta B, Meshikhes AW, Port site metastases after a laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer: Report of a case: Surg Today, 2011; 41(3); 412-14, pmid: 21365427
9.. Kilfoy BA, Devesa SS, Ward MH, Gender is an age-specific effect modifier for papillary cancers of the thyroid gland: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2009; 18(4); 1092-100, pmid: 19293311
10.. Thomas V, George R, Collision tumors of the thyroid: Review of literature and report of a case of papillary – Follicular collision tumor: Thyroid Research and Practice, 2018; 15(2)
11.. Zhang Z, Min J, Yu D, Renal collision tumour of papillary cell carcinoma and chromophobe cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid transformation: A case report and review of the literature: Can Urol Assoc J, 2014; 8(7–8); E536-39, pmid: 25210558
12.. Ryan N, Walkden G, Lazic D, Tierney P, Collision tumors of the thyroid: A case report and review of the literature: Head Neck, 2015; 37(10); E125-29, pmid: 25491252
13.. Elbahnasy AM, Hoenig DM, Shalhav A, Laparoscopic staging of bladder tumor: Concerns about port site metastases: J Endourol, 1998; 12(1); 55-59, pmid: 9531153
14.. Kosugi C, Ono M, Saito N, Port site recurrence diagnosed by positron emission tomography after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: Hepatogastroenterology, 2005; 52(65); 1440-43, pmid: 16201091
15.. Vergote I, Marquette S, Amant F, Port-site metastases after open laparoscopy: A study in 173 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2005; 15(5); 776-79, pmid: 16174223
16.. Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Skawran S, A case of port-site recurrence after laparoscopic adrenalectomy for solitary adrenal metastasis: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2007; 17(3); 218-20, pmid: 17581473
17.. Schaeff B, Paolucci V, Thomopoulos J, Port site recurrences after laparoscopic surgery: Dig Surg, 1998; 15; 124-34, pmid: 9845574
18.. Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Schneider M, Gutt C, Tumor seeding following laparoscopy: International survey: World J Surgery, 1999; 23; 989-97
19.. Halpin VJ, Underwood RA, Ye D, Pneumoperitoneum does not influence trocar site implantation during tumor manipulation in a solid tumor model: Surg Endosc, 2005; 19(12); 1636-40, pmid: 16211435
20.. Kim JH, Choi YJ, Kim JA, Thyroid cancer that developed around the operative bed and subcutaneous tunnel after endoscopic thyroidectomy via a breast approach: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2008; 18(2); 197-201, pmid: 18427342
21.. Hur SM, Kim SH, Lee SK, Is a thyroid follicular neoplasm a good indication for endoscopic surgery?: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2011; 21(3); e148-51, pmid: 21654291
22.. Kim HS, Kim SH, Kim JH, Multifocal hot spots demonstrated by whole-body 131I scintigraphy and SPECT/CT after transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy: Clin Nucl Med, 2015; 40(3); 260-62, pmid: 25642914
23.. Espiard S, Petyt G, Lion G, Ectopic subcutaneous implantation of thyroid tissue after gasless transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer: Thyroid, 2015; 25(12); 1381-82, pmid: 26563453
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.947287
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949145
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.946308
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.948833
Most Viewed Current Articles
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
103,595
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
55,094
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133
20 Nov 2023 : Case report
39,882
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.941424
Am J Case Rep 2023; 24:e941424
07 Jul 2023 : Case report
26,810
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.940200
Am J Case Rep 2023; 24:e940200






