Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

24 January 2022: Articles  USA

Prolonged Cefepime-Induced Neurotoxicity in a Patient with End-Stage Renal Disease

Unusual clinical course, Adverse events of drug therapy , Clinical situation which can not be reproduced for ethical reasons

Dorothy Dao Nguyen1ADEF*, Samuel Lai1DE

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.934083

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934083

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, has a known adverse effect of neurotoxicity. It occurs notably in patients with end-stage renal disease, but symptom resolution typically occurs within a median of 2 days following drug discontinuation.

CASE REPORT: We present a patient with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis (TWThSat) who developed prolonged neurotoxicity lasting longer than 1 week complicated by nonconvulsive status epilepticus 2 days after cefepime discontinuation. She presented initially with a right upper-extremity arteriovenous graft infection from extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli, and was treated with cefepime. She eventually developed acute encephalopathy, and cefepime was discontinued. However, 2 days later, she developed seizures with worsened mental status. She was stabilized on levetiracetam and lorazepam, but developed hypotension in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU), delaying hemodialysis. Hemodialysis was performed 6 days after cefepime discontinuation once she was stabilized, and her mental status improved 1 to 2 days after, with full improvement 20 days after admission. She was discharged on levetiracetam and meropenem. In addition, we review risk factors and symptomology of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity and discuss important management issues.

CONCLUSIONS: Careful attention should be paid when administering cefepime to patients with end-stage renal disease. Patients showing signs of encephalopathy should not be on cefepime any longer, and more aggressive measures may be taken, such as prompt hemodialysis, assessment of cefepime blood levels, and electroencephalogram (EEG) to monitor for signs of seizures. Prolonging hemodialysis in patients with signs of cefepime neurotoxicity can pose a danger for more serious sequelae, such as status epilepticus. Close monitoring of patients at high risk of developing adverse events from cefepime administration can ensure patient safety and well-being.

Keywords: Brain Diseases, cefepime, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Seizures

Background

Cefepime is a commonly used fourth-generation cephalosporin. Its most notable adverse effect, neurotoxicity, occurs mostly in patients with impaired renal function [1]. Symptom resolution typically occurs within a median of 2 days after drug discontinuation [2]. We discuss a case occurring outside this time window, an 86-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, presenting with right upper-extremity arteriovenous graft infection, who later had complications of encephalopathy and nonconvulsive status epilepticus following 2 days of cefepime discontinuation.

Case Report

An 86-year-old woman with a history of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis sessions 4 times a week was admitted to the hospital for a right upper-extremity arteriovenous (AV) graft infection. Cultures from the wound grew extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) Escherichia coli (E. coli). Sensitivities of ESBL E. coli are documented in Table 1. Given the sensitivities, she was started on cefepime 2 g i.v. every 48 h renally dosed for 1 day, then switched to meropenem 500 mg every 24 h for 3 days. The patient was noted to have confusion reported 2 days after cefepime initiation, but there were no other reported incidents thereafter. For her AV graft infection, she underwent resection and ligation of the AV graft, wash-out, debridement, and wound closure, and opted for placement of a tunneled dialysis catheter for hemodialysis access. Ultimately, she was placed back on cefepime 1 g i.v. every 24 h renally dosed while an inpatient, which she was scheduled to take for 6 weeks after washout. She was discharged to a skilled nursing facility on cefepime 2 g i.v. renally dosed after hemodialysis sessions 3 times a week, and her home medications acetaminophen 650 mg every 4 h as needed, carvedilol 3.125 mg twice a day, pantoprazole 40 mg every day, pravastatin 10 mg every night at bedtime, polyethylene glycol 3350 17 g twice a day, senna glycoside 17.2 mg twice a day, and ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate every 6 h as needed.

She was readmitted for acute encephalopathy 21 days after cefepime reinitiation. Her family reported her mental status had been altered since the beginning of her first hospitalization, the day after she began cefepime. Laboratory values at the time of this admission are summarized in Table 2. Due to the temporal relationship of her symptoms with cefepime administration, and the unclear picture of whether her cefepime was given correctly after her hemodialysis sessions, her condition was attributed to cefepime toxicity (Naranjo algorithm– ADR probability score of 9, definite) and the antimicrobial was discontinued. She was switched to piperacillin/tazobactam for her ESBL E. coli. Encephalopathy work-up, including basic laboratory tests, broad infectious work-up, endocrinopathies, toxin-mediated encephalopathy, and CT head were un-remarkable. Two days after cefepime discontinuation, near the end of dialysis, she had bilateral upper-extremity tonic-clonic seizures with upgaze lasting 30 s to 1 min, followed by worsening mental status (A&Ox0) and subsequent bleeding from her mouth. She was nonresponsive to pain and verbal stimuli, which was highly concerning for nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Lorazepam and levetiracetam loads were administered, after which she began responding to pain but was still verbally nonresponsive.

Electroencephalogram (EEG) showed high-voltage, generalized, anterior predominant 2.5–3 Hz sharp wave discharges. After lorazepam and levetiracetam administration, there were no spontaneous evolving electrographic seizures.

Laboratory findings on the day after are summarized in Table 2. She continued maintenance levetiracetam 500 mg twice a day with 500 mg after hemodialysis. That same day, she was admitted to the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU) for close neurological monitoring. In the Neuro-ICU, the etiology of her seizures was considered to be cefepime neurotoxicity vs meningitis or encephalitis, and she was administered acyclovir 350 mg every 24 h and vancomycin 1 g i.v. once for empiric meningitis treatment. Piperacillin/tazobactam was also switched to meropenem, and meropenem was dosed for meningitis treatment. Three days after her seizures and 6 days after admission, she underwent hemodialysis, which had been delayed due to hypotension in the Neuro-ICU. That same day, she had atrial flutter with RVR, for which she received metoprolol tartrate. Her mental status improved 1 day later (7 days after admission), and she was alert and oriented to person, place, and time, with some waxing and waning. She improved even further on the next day, and was alert and oriented to person, place, and time without waxing and waning. She underwent MRI following her atrial flutter, and she was diagnosed with an asymptomatic subacute cerebrovascular accident (CVA) due to small-vessel disease. However, due to the small size of the CVA, it was unlikely to be the cause of her acute encephalopathy. A lumbar puncture was attempted but was not successful. As there was a lack of inflammation on MRI, fever, and leukocytosis, meningitis was also an unlikely cause, so acyclovir and vancomycin were discontinued 7 days after initiation.

The patient became conversant and remained seizure-free and alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Given her improved mental status, she was discharged 20 days after admission with home health on levetiracetam 500 mg twice a day and 500 mg after hemodialysis, meropenem 500 mg every 24 h until 5 days after discharge, aspirin 81 mg every day, metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg twice a day, midodrine 10 mg twice a day, pravastatin 20 mg every night at bedtime, and sevelamer carbonate 800 mg 3 times a day. She remained seizure-free and her encephalopathy was improved (alert and oriented to person, place, and time) after discharge. These events are summarized in Table 2.

Discussion

Cefepime is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin commonly used in hospital and community settings. It has many associated adverse effects: encephalitic signs (associated with 94% of patients with neurological signs after cefepime), confusion (50%), seizures (15%), aphasia (10%), and hallucinations (2%) [2]. Myoclonus was associated with 45.5% of cases. Its most notable adverse effect, neurotoxicity, is believed to be linked to antagonism of concentration-dependent GABA receptors [3].

Risk factors include renal failure (associated with 89% of cases) and underlying brain disease (18%), which includes CVA, Korsakoff’s syndrome, small-vessel disease, Alzheimer disease, benign brain tumor, malignancy, and previous seizures. Renal failure was the most widely studied, as the half-life of cefepime increases as renal function declines [4]. Impaired renal function can increase available unbound cefepime, which can reach the CNS via increased CSF cefepime concentrations and decreased CSF to blood elimination [1]. Studies show cefepime-induced encephalopathy can occur in ESRD patients regardless of dosing, with these as low as 0.5 g/day of cefepime [5].

Of note, these studies also suggested an increased association between underlying CNS brain disease, cefepime-induced encephalopathy, and ESRD [5].

In regards to symptomatology, these occur within a median of 4 days, with increased dosages linked to increased occurrence of neurologic symptoms [2]. Discontinuation leads to resolution within 2–7 days (median 2 days), and decreasing the dosage also often leads to symptom resolution. Cefepime reinitiation leads to quicker recurrence. Our patient began to improve 7 days after cefepime discontinuation, but still had waxing and waning of symptoms. She improved even further by days 8 and 9, with improvement in her waxing and waning, and was fully improved at discharge, 20 days after discontinuation.

Hemodialysis contributes to faster symptom resolution by facilitating a rapid decrease in serum cefepime concentration. For this reason, current data supports early hemodialysis, as it can decrease cerebral exposure to cefepime levels [6]. Unfortunately, her episode of status epilepticus and hypo-tension had delayed her hemodialysis. If conditions had been safe for the patient to undergo hemodialysis, she likely would have avoided the complications of her cefepime neurotoxicity.

Switching antibiotics to piperacillin or carbapenems often resolves symptoms, but in a few cases, the switches to meropenem and piperacillin were suspected to have extended the recovery phase [2]. Our patient was switched to piperacillin and later meropenem, and although her prolonged recovery was more likely due to her prolonged interval between hemodialysis sessions, this possibility cannot be denied.

Common electroencephalogram findings include diffuse and symmetrical slow activity, diffuse delta rhythm, and paroxysmal abnormalities, like sharp waves, spike waves, slow-wave complexes, triphasic waves predominating in anterior regions, at a frequency of 2–3 Hz. EEG abnormalities often disappear with benzodiazepine administration [2]. Indeed, this was the pattern initially displayed on EEG monitoring of our patient – high-voltage, generalized, anterior predominant 2.5-3Hz spike and wave discharges. This abated with the administration of lorazepam.

Our patient’s ESRD on dialysis increased her risk for cefepime-induced neurotoxicity, and the course of her symptomatology – confusion, encephalitis, seizures, EEG findings, and seizure resolution – were typical of symptoms described in the literature. However, given the information above, our patient was an atypical case. Instead of symptom resolution 2 days after cefepime discontinuation, we saw prolonged encephalopathy lasting more than 7 days and nonconvulsive status epilepticus occurring 2 days later. Several factors may have contributed to this progression. Following cefepime discontinuation, our patient had not been able to complete dialysis prior to her seizure. Discontinuing the drug alone may have been insufficient to prevent further adverse events caused by cefepime. Given that she improved quickly after hemodialysis, and had she been hemodynamically and neurologically stable enough to undergo the procedure, she may have recovered sooner. Patients with ESRD displaying signs of cefepime neurotoxicity may benefit from more aggressive dialysis soon after discontinuing the drug.

Furthermore, our patient did initially show signs of encephalopathy on cefepime at her first admission prior to switching to meropenem. She was later restarted on the medication and again showed signs of encephalopathy. In such cases where a patient displays signs thought to be related to cefepime, care should be taken to refrain from further use and not to restart them on the drug after discontinuation. Early recognition of signs, early hemodialysis, and monitoring of blood levels are key to the safety of patients on cefepime.

Our patient may have also been in nonconvulsive status epilepticus prior to her witnessed event and would have benefited from earlier EEG monitoring. Furthermore, our patient had a CVA around the time of her seizures. As CVA and small-vessel disease are risk factors for cefepime-induced neurotoxicity, perhaps her small-vessel disease contributed to her prolonged encephalopathy and delayed recovery. Her ESRD was also a risk factor for CVA, which can pose a risk for seizures as well, in addition to her cefepime neurotoxicity. These are factors to consider when assessing the risk of a patient with ESRD for neurologic adverse effects before starting the patient on cefepime.

Conclusions

Our case depicts the neurologic sequelae that can occur when starting a patient with ESRD on cefepime, and portrays the need to adhere to scheduled hemodialysis when they begin to show signs of neurotoxicity. Careful attention should be paid when administering cefepime to patients with impaired renal function, as renal disease poses a risk for CVAs, which compounds the risk for encephalopathy and seizures. If a patient begins to display signs of encephalopathy on cefepime, this should be seen as an early sign and the drug should be quickly discontinued. Afterward, more aggressive interventions should be completed to prevent serious adverse events and delayed recovery, such as completing prompt hemodialysis and performing an early EEG. Delaying hemodialysis can prolong encephalopathy and increases patients’ risk for more serious sequelae such as status epilepticus. Cefepime blood levels should be monitored in these patients. Proper identification of risk factors and care of patients suspected of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity during and after administration are essential to their well-being and full recovery.

References:

1.. Li HT, Lee CH, Wu T, Clinical, electroencephalographic features and prognostic factors of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: A retrospective study: Neurocrit Care, 2019; 31(2); 329-37

2.. Deshayes S, Coquerel A, Verdon R, Neurological adverse effects attributable to β-lactam antibiotics: A literature review: Drug Safety, 2017; 40(12); 1171-98

3.. Boschung-Pasquier L, Atkinson A, Kastner LK, Cefepime neurotoxicity: Thresholds and risk factors. A retrospective cohort study: Clin Microbiol Infect, 2020; 26(3); 333-39

4.. Shah M, Shah H, Maslekar A, Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity in a patient with coronary artery bypass: Indian J Pharmacol, 2016; 48(5); 599-600

5.. Nakagawa R, Sato K, Uesaka Y, Cefepime-induced encephalopathy in end-stage renal disease patients: J Neurol Sci, 2017; 376; 123-28

6.. Garin A, Bavozet F, Myoclonic status epilepticus induced by cefepime overdose requiring haemodialysis: BMJ Case Rep, 2019; 12(6); e228108

7.. Cunningham JM, Sachs KV, Allyn R, Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity presenting with nonconvulsive status epilepticus admitted as a stroke alert: Am J Case Rep, 2020; 21; e921643

8.. Thabet F, Al Maghrabi M, Al Barraq A, Tabarki B, Cefepime-induced nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Case report and review: Neurocrit Care, 2009; 10(3); 347-51

9.. Fernández-Fernández FJ, Ameneiros-Lago E, Cefepime-induced encephalopathy: A possible additional mechanism of neurotoxicity: Neurocritical Care, 2020; 32(2); 641

10.. Kenzaka T, Matsumoto M, Cefepime-induced encephalopathy: BMJ Case Rep, 2018; 2018; bcr2017223954

11.. Lindsay H, Gruner S, Brackett J, Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity despite dose adjustment for renal disease: A brief report and review of the literature: J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc, 2017; 6(2); 199-201

12.. Grahl JJ, Stollings JL, Rakhit S, Antimicrobial exposure and the risk of delirium in critically ill patients: Crit Care, 2018; 22(1); 337

SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19

16 June 2022 : Case report  Ecuador

Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Patient with SARS-Cov-2 Pneumonia in an Intensive Care Unit ...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936498  

13 June 2022 : Case report  Japan

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infection Associated with COVID-19: A Case Series and Literature Review

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936889  

13 June 2022 : Case report  Saudi Arabia

Atlantoaxial Subluxation Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Rare Orthopedic Complication from COVID-19

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936128  

03 June 2022 : Case report  Japan

Clinical Outcomes of Sotrovimab Treatment in 10 High-Risk Patients with Mild COVID-19: A Case Series

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936832  

In Press

24 Jun 2022 : Case report  USA

A 24-Year-Old Man Presenting with Lung Metastases from a Primary Retroperitoneal Extragonadal Choriocarcinoma

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936288  

24 Jun 2022 : Case report  Romania

Odontogenic Keratocyst: The Dos and Don’ts in a Clinical Case Scenario

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936641  

24 Jun 2022 : Case report  Saudi Arabia

Management of Patients with Alagille Syndrome Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Report of 2 ...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936513  

22 Jun 2022 : Case report  USA

A Case of Lymphomatoid Granulomatosis in a Lymph Node with Unique Clinical and Histopathologic Features

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936862  

Most Viewed Current Articles

23 Feb 2022 : Case report  USA

Penile Necrosis Associated with Local Intravenous Injection of Cocaine

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935250

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250

17 Feb 2022 : Case report  Oman

Myocarditis, Pulmonary Hemorrhage, and Extensive Myositis with Rhabdomyolysis 12 Days After First Dose of P...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934399

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934399

06 Dec 2021 : Case report  Brazil

Lipedema Can Be Treated Non-Surgically: A Report of 5 Cases

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406

09 Feb 2022 : Case report  Saudi Arabia

Extensive Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) After the First Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA COV...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934744

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934744

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923