Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

23 July 2024: Articles  Saudi Arabia

Management of Acute Corneal Hydrops Using Compression Sutures and Intracameral Air Injection

Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment

Fatma Elnaggar ORCID logo12ACDEF*, Heba Alsharif1ABCD, Mohammad Almutlak1ABCD, Rafah Fairaq ORCID logo1ABCD, Omar Mohammad Kirat1ABCDEF, Halah Bin Helayel1ABCDE

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944517

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944517

0 Comments

Abstract

0:00

BACKGROUND: Acute corneal hydrops, a rare complication of keratoconus, is characterized by sudden onset of corneal stroma edema. It typically manifests as an acute decrease in visual acuity, accompanied by pain and photophobia. Prompt recognition and interventions are critical for effective resolution of hydrops and prevention of corneal vascularization. Herein, we present a case of a patient with keratoconus who developed corneal hydrops, successfully managed using full-thickness compression sutures and intracameral air injection.

CASE REPORT: A woman in her early 30s, with a history of keratoconus, presented with symptoms of acute hydrops in her left eye. On presentation, best corrected visual acuity was hand motion. Slit-lamp examination revealed marked corneal edema with multiple stromal clefts. The decision was made to perform full-thickness compression sutures combined with intracameral air injection to expedite edema resolution and prevent neovascularization. Three full-thickness sutures were placed across Descemet membrane breaks, and an air bubble was left, filling 50% of the anterior chamber. At 3-month follow-up, a clear, compact cornea was noted, with no evidence of vascularization. The patient was scheduled for penetrating keratoplasty for visual rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS: The combination of full-thickness compression sutures and intracameral air seems to be an effective and safe method for preventing corneal angiogenesis following hydrops. As corneal scaring is often an inevitable complication of acute corneal hydrops, keratoplasty is necessary for improving visual acuity. Hence, the prevention of corneal vascularization should be the major aim in the management of corneal hydrops to ensure successful keratoplasty.

Keywords: Corneal Edema, Corneal Neovascularization, Corneal Stroma, Keratoconus

Introduction

Acute corneal hydrops is a sudden corneal edema secondary to rupture of the Descemet membrane (DM), resulting in infiltration of aqueous humor into the corneal stroma. Although it most commonly occurs as a rare complication of keratoconus, it can occur with other corneal ectasias such as keratoglobus and pellucid marginal degeneration [1]. Acute corneal hydrops presents as acute onset of severe visual impairment, photosensitivity, and pain. Corneal hydrops is diagnosed clinically by history and slit-lamp examination (SLE), usually showing extensive corneal edema leading to opacification of the stroma, which can be accompanied by intrastromal clefts and epithelial edema and bullae [2,3]. The diagnosis is confirmed by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) demonstrating a break in the DM [4]. Although it is usually a self-limiting condition that resolves spontaneously, the duration of the resolution of edema varies from 2 to 6 months. In cases of a large DM break and the presence of intrastromal clefts, prolonged inflammation and edema can promote corneal vascularization that precludes successful future keratoplasty [5].

Multiple approaches have been proposed for managing corneal hydrops to hasten the resolution of edema. In mild cases, conservative treatment may be attempted initially. This includes the use of topical cycloplegics, hyperosmotics, aqueous suppressants, and steroids, in an attempt to reduce the inflammatory response [6]. Although conventional treatment can expedite the resolution of edema and minimize inflammation, the presence of intrastromal clefts significantly delays corneal edema healing and predisposes to corneal neovascularization [5]. Descemetopexy using air or gasses such as sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and perfluoropropane (C3F8) accelerate the resolution of edema, but repeated injections are often required [7,8]. Recently, studies have proposed that the use of compressive corneal sutures, including full-thickness or pre-DM, with or without intracameral gas/air injection allows for approximation of detached DM edges [9–12]. Other surgical options like mini-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (Mini-DMEK) have also been proposed [13]. Ultimately, most patients require penetrating keratoplasty for visual rehabilitation due to significant corneal scarring [1,14]. Hence, it is crucial to minimize the risk of neovascularization to guarantee long-term graft survival. In this report, we present a case of severe corneal hydrops that demonstrated prompt resolution with full-thickness compression sutures combined with intracameral air injection.

Case Report

A woman in her 30s with keratoconus presented to the Emergency Department with a sudden onset of markedly decreased vision in her left eye, accompanied by pain, photophobia, and a whitish discoloration of the cornea. She used bilateral contact lens for refractive correction. Upon presentation, the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was limited to hand motion OS and 20/20 OD with contact lenses in place. SLE OS indicated severe near limbus-to-limbus corneal edema with multiple intrastromal clefts. ASOCT revealed a wide separation of the DM and multiple intrastromal fluid-filled pockets, confirming the diagnosis of acute corneal hydrops (Figure 1). Given the large DM tear and the presence of stromal clefts demonstrated on ASOCT, the decision was made to proceed with a surgical intervention using compression sutures and intracameral air injection. Our main aim was to accelerate the resolution of edema to prevent corneal vascularization.

The patient was admitted and signed an informed consent for the procedure. The left eye was prepped and draped in the usual sterile manner, and a lid speculum was placed for maximum globe exposure. Under general anesthesia, a prophylactic iridectomy was performed at 6 o’clock, and an air bubble was injected into the anterior chamber to delineate DM breaks. A total of 3 full-thickness interrupted 10-0 Prolene sutures were applied, with 2 parallel sutures and 1 transverse suture applied in areas of proposed DM breaks. At the end of the procedure, an air bubble was left filling 50% of the anterior chamber, and a bandage contact lens (BCL) was placed. She was instructed to maintain a supine position for 24 h postoperatively. Postoperatively, she was prescribed topical 0.15% brimonidine tartrate twice daily, 1% cyclopentolate 3 times daily, 0.5% moxifloxacin 4 times daily, 1% prednisolone acetate, 5% sodium chloride once daily at bedtime, and 0.3% polyethylene glycol 4 times daily. She tolerated the procedure well and was shifted to the recovery room in good condition.

On the first postoperative day, the patient reported an improvement in pain and photophobia. Uncorrected visual acuity OS was hand motion at least. SLE disclosed a marked reduction in corneal edema, intact sutures, and the BCL in place. On the second postoperative day, corneal edema had further resolved by 50%. Visual acuity OS was 20/200-1. Corneal examination before discharge indicated completely attached DM edges and resolution of intrastromal clefts. Upon discharge, the patient was instructed to avoid bending, heavy lifting, swimming, eye rubbing, travel by plane or going to high altitude, and a follow-up was scheduled for 2 weeks.

In the first follow-up visit, SLE indicated complete resolution of corneal edema and clefts and a moderate central scar. In the third postoperative month, corneal sutures were removed under aseptic conditions in the operating room. A clear compact cornea with moderate central scar was noted on SLE and there was no evidence of corneal neovascularization (Figure 1). At the 5-month follow-up, best corrected contact lens-assisted visual acuity had improved from 2/200-1 to 20/50. ASOCT illustrated decreased corneal thickness and a marked central scar involving the visual axis (Figure 1). The patient was scheduled for penetrating keratoplasty 3 months after suture removal for visual rehabilitation due to the significant corneal scar.

Discussion

Acute corneal hydrops is a self-limiting condition that resolves spontaneously, even in the presence of extensive intrastromal clefts, over a period of 2–6 months [2]. The main aim of both conventional and surgical interventions is to hasten resolution of edema. Multiple surgical interventions have demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the time to resolve edema, promising improvement in visual acuity, and a decline in the need for keratoplasty. However, few studies have assessed the safety and efficacy of full-thickness compression sutures combined with intracameral air injection in severe acute corneal hydrops and its role in the prevention of corneal vascularization [12,15–17]. Because patients with advanced keratoconus are likely to undergo keratoplasty even in the absence of corneal hydrops, it is important to ensure a successful cornea graft. Despite its favorable long-term outcomes in the treatment of keratoconus with and without prior acute hydrops, penetrating keratoplasty carries a substantial risk of graft rejection if performed during an episode of acute hydrops, due to the inflammation and edema. Furthermore, the risk of graft rejection is higher in keratoconus cases with prior resolved acute hydrops [18graft survival, and associated factors following penetrating keratoplasty (PK]. The main advantage of this technique is the rapid resolution of edema that impedes corneal angiogenesis.

Several studies have concluded that descemetopexy with air or gas is not effective as a sole measure, especially in the presence of multiple stromal clefts, as in our case [19]. In a retrospective case series, Rajaraman et al [9] studied the difference between using intracameral C3F8 alone versus a combination procedure with compression sutures. They concluded that the combination of intracameral C3F8 and full-thickness compression sutures resulted in faster resolution of edema than intracameral C3F8 alone. Additionally, Sharma et al [20] reported a case of failed resolution of corneal hydrops despite intracameral C3F8 injections due to migration of gas into stromal clefts, impeding closure. Furthermore, 2 randomized trials by Zhao et al [21] and Liu et al [12] compared the use of full-thickness compression sutures combined with intracameral air injection with thermokeratoplasy and pre-DM sutures, respectively. Both studies reported faster edema resolution in the full-thickness sutures and intracameral air injection than in their respective control groups. Accordingly, we decided to use full-thickness compression sutures combined with intracameral air injection.

Incorporation of the advantages of compression sutures and intracameral air in the management of corneal hydrops produces better outcomes than using a single technique. While compression sutures approximate detached DM margins and help in squeezing the fluid out of the corneal stroma, intracameral air acts as a tamponade and prevents further penetration of aqueous humor into the corneal stroma. Due to the higher risk of malignant glaucoma associated with the use of non-expansile gasses for descemetopexy, intracameral air injection is preferred to tamponade detachments [19,21]. Nevertheless, prophylactic iridotomy was deemed necessary to surmount the risk of acute glaucoma secondary to the presence of air bubbles in the anterior chamber.

During the procedure, 3 interrupted sutures were placed – 2 parallel and 1 transverse to areas of DM breaks. Prolene sutures were used instead of the conventional nylon sutures because greater tensile strength was needed to approximate the bulky detached edges. Afterwards, the development of corneal scar caused flattening of the cornea, which facilitated contact lens fitting, improving BCVA. Despite the postoperative uneven corneal surface, our main objective of inhibiting corneal angiogenesis to avoid converting the case to high-risk keratoplasty was successfully accomplished.

Conclusions

Full-thickness compression sutures combined with intracameral air injection seems to be an effective and safe method for the management of corneal hydrops and to minimize the risk of vascularization. Development of corneal scars is a common complication of acute corneal hydrops, necessitating keratoplasty for visual rehabilitation. Prompt management of corneal hydrops may be important in reducing the risk of corneal vascularization to ensure successful keratoplasty.

References:

1.. Fan Gaskin JC, Patel DV, McGhee CNJ, Acute corneal hydrops in keratoconus – new perspectives: Am J Ophthalmol, 2014; 157(5); 921-28 e1

2.. Galvis V, Tello A, Cianci MF, Giant intrastromal cleft in corneal hydrops: Int Ophthalmol, 2018; 38(4); 1727-32

3.. Bachmann B, Händel A, Siebelmann S, Mini-descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for the early treatment of acute corneal hydrops in keratoconus: Cornea, 2019; 38(8); 1043-48

4.. Basu S, Vaddavalli PK, Vemuganti GK, Anterior segment optical coherence tomography features of acute corneal hydrops: Cornea, 2012; 31(5); 479-85

5.. Feder RS, Wilhelmus KR, Vold SD, O’Grady RB, Intrastromal clefts in keratoconus patients with hydrops: Am J Ophthalmol, 1998; 126(1); 9-16

6.. Lanthier A, Choulakian M, Treatment strategies for the management of acute hydrops: J Fr Ophtalmol, 2021; 44(9); 1439-44

7.. Miyata K, Tsuji H, Tanabe T, Intracameral air injection for acute hydrops in keratoconus: Am J Ophthalmol, 2002; 133(6); 750-52

8.. Sayadi JJ, Lam H, Lin CC, Myung D, Management of acute corneal hydrops with intracameral gas injection: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep, 2020; 20; 100994

9.. Rajaraman R, Singh S, Raghavan A, Karkhanis A, Efficacy and safety of intracameral perfluoropropane (C3F8) tamponade and compression sutures for the management of acute corneal hydrops: Cornea, 2009; 28(3); 317-20

10.. García-Albisua AM, Davila-Avila N, Hernandez-Quintela E, Visual and anatomic results after sole full-thickness sutures for acute corneal hydrops: Cornea, 2020; 39(5); 661-65

11.. Yahia Chérif H, Gueudry J, Afriat M, Efficacy and safety of pre-Descemet’s membrane sutures for the management of acute corneal hydrops in keratoconus: Br J Ophthalmol, 2015; 99(6); 773-77

12.. Liu X, Li H, Qu S, Different compression sutures combined with intracameral air injection for acute corneal hydrops: Int J Ophthalmol, 2022; 15(9); 1538-43

13.. Händel A, Siebelmann S, Hos D, Comparison of Mini-DMEK versus predescemetal sutures as treatment of acute hydrops in keratoconus: Acta Ophthalmol, 2021; 99(8); e1326-33

14.. Tuft SJ, Gregory WM, Buckley RJ, Acute corneal hydrops in keratoconus: Ophthalmology, 1994; 101(10); 1738-44

15.. Chaurasia S, Ramappa M, Murthy S, Rapid resolution of large and non- resolving corneal hydrops using a modified technique of compression sutures: Semin Ophthalmol, 2022; 37(5); 637-42

16.. Singh M, Prasad N, Sinha BP, Management of acute corneal hydrops with compression sutures and air tamponade: Indian J Ophthalmol, 2022; 70(6); 2210

17.. Daza J, Ramappa M, Murthy S, Chaurasia S, Strategies and application of compression sutures with a modified technique for rapid resolution of large (Grade III) hydrops: A prospective interventional study: Cornea, 2024 [Online ahead of print]

18.. Meyer JJ, Gokul A, Crawford AZ, McGhee CNJ, Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus with and without resolved corneal hydrops: Long-term results: Am J Ophthalmol, 2016; 169; 282-89

19.. Basu S, Vaddavalli PK, Ramappa M, Intracameral perfluoropropane gas in the treatment of acute corneal hydrops: Ophthalmology, 2011; 118(5); 934-39

20.. Sharma N, Mannan R, Titiyal JS, Nonresolution of acute hydrops because of intrastromal migration of perfluoropropane gas: Cornea, 2010; 29(8); 944-46

21.. Zhao Z, Wu S, Ren W, Compression sutures combined with intracameral air injection versus thermokeratoplasty for acute corneal hydrops: A prospective-randomised trial: Br J Ophthalmol, 2021; 105(12); 1645-50

In Press

Case report  Saudi Arabia

Critical Chest Wall Necrotizing Fasciitis Triggered by Herpes Zoster: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944186  

Case report  Greece

Focal Autoimmune Pancreatitis Morphologically Mimicking Pancreatic Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944286  

Case report  USA

Amyloidosis Found in the Breast: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944755  

Case report  Cyprus

Musculoskeletal Pain and Right Leg Paresthesia Revealed as Large Ovarian Mucinous Cystadenoma: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.945083  

Most Viewed Current Articles

07 Mar 2024 : Case report  USA 41,597

Neurocysticercosis Presenting as Migraine in the United States

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133

0:00

10 Jan 2022 : Case report  Germany 32,206

A Report on the First 7 Sequential Patients Treated Within the C-Reactive Protein Apheresis in COVID (CACOV...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935263

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935263

23 Feb 2022 : Case report  USA 19,322

Penile Necrosis Associated with Local Intravenous Injection of Cocaine

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935250

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250

19 Jul 2022 : Case report  Saudi Arabia 18,577

Atlantoaxial Subluxation Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Rare Orthopedic Complication from COVID-19

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.936128

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e936128

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923