18 October 2024: Articles
Precision Extraction of Lingual Mandibular Supernumerary Teeth Using Dynamic Navigation and High-Speed Handpieces: A Case Report
Unusual clinical course, Challenging differential diagnosis, Management of emergency care, Patient complains / malpractice, Congenital defects / diseases
Fangfang Xu12ABCDE, Sadam Ahmed Elayah 12ABCDEF, Jiaxin Ren12BDE, Jun Bo Tu12ABEFG, Si Jia Na 12ABCDEFGDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.945262
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e945262
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth requires precision and accuracy to mitigate iatrogenic damage to crucial anatomical structures during dental surgical procedures, thereby enhancing postoperative healing outcomes. Dynamic navigation systems (DNS) have been applied in dentistry in maxillofacial fractures, orthognathic surgery, root canal treatment, and endodontic surgery.
CASE REPORT: A 22-year-old female patient visited our department to assess and manage unerupted third molars. An initial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was obtained. Radiographic and clinical examinations showed the presence of a supernumerary tooth impacted on the lingual side between the root of the lower second premolar and the lower first molar and bilateral lower impacted third molars. The patient agreed to removal of these teeth. To perform the treatment planning of this case and to guide the surgeon intraoperatively, a dynamic surgical navigation system was recommended for surgical extraction of a supernumerary tooth and the impacted third molars.
CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic navigation system coupled with a high-speed contra-angle handpiece for the extraction of supernumerary teeth is a personalized, digitally-driven, precise, minimally invasive, and efficient treatment approach. In this case, the DNS and the high-speed contra-angle handpiece were seamlessly integrated to facilitate visualization of the surgical procedure, thereby safeguarding of surrounding vital anatomical structures while enhancing patient comfort.
Keywords: Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Surgical Navigation Systems, Tooth Extraction, Tooth, Supernumerary
Introduction
The term “supernumerary tooth” refers to teeth in excess of the normal number of teeth and can occur in either the primary or permanent dentition. Seventy-five percent of super-numerary teeth are impacted, while the rest are partially or fully erupted [1]. The embedded type of supernumerary teeth can cause delayed eruption of permanent teeth, dental crowding, tooth root resorption, and even cranial and maxillofacial deformity [2]. Surgical removal is typically necessary for supernumerary teeth, which is one of the most prevalent dental anomalies. Currently, a variety of instruments are available for this purpose, including pneumatic dental handpieces [3], ultrasonic osteotomes [4,5], and dental lasers [6]. The advent of minimally invasive and patient-friendly surgical techniques has led to the gradual incorporation of digital positioning guides [7,8], virtual and simulation technologies [12–14], and intraoperative navigation into tooth extraction procedures [9–13]. Despite these advances, several challenges persist. For instance, pneumatic dental handpieces cannot precisely locate the tooth that needs to be sectioned during surgery, relying heavily on the surgeon’s skill. This presents a significant challenge for novice surgeons, potentially resulting in damage to the inferior alveolar nerve or even necessitating abandonment of the extraction. While ultrasonic osteotomes and lasers can reduce the risk of nerve injury during bone removal or tooth sectioning, their low cutting efficiency prolongs the surgery, thereby increasing patient discomfort and the risk of postoperative infection. However, it is difficult to remove the impacted supernumerary tooth due to unclear surgical vision, small operating space, and surrounding important anatomical structures, such as the maxillary sinus, nasal cavity, inferior alveolar nerve, lingual nerve, mental nerve, and adjacent tooth root. Therefore, precise operations are required to prevent iatrogenic injury to important anatomical structures and improve postoperative healing.
The modern dynamic navigation system (DNS) was first applied in neurosurgery, with three-dimensional visualization, preoperative virtual design, and precise real-time dynamic tracking. It was not until 1995 that DNS was finally used in dental clinics, mainly in craniomaxillofacial fractures and orthognathic surgery and later in root canal treatment and oral implant surgery [14]. This DNS has expanded its application and may become an essential tool for various procedures, enhancing safety and predictability [15]. Guo et al first removed the mandibular third molar under DNS, and then Emery et al performed 25 cases of extraction of complex mandibular third molars under dynamic navigation, improving visualization and localization, and control during osteotomy, decreasing surgical time [13,16]. Wang et al found that DNS can provide higher localization accuracy and reduced bone trauma for extracting supernumerary teeth [17,18]. However, the aforementioned DNS still has certain limitations, as its main function is preoperative surgical design and intraoperative precise positioning, playing a role in surgical exploration and guidance.
In this case, we fully matched and combined the dynamic navigation system and the high-speed contra-angle handpiece to achieve real-time dynamic visualization of the entire surgical process. We found that DNS-assisted extraction of a supernumerary tooth is more accurate, less invasive, requires less surgical time, and is more comfortable for the patient.
Case Report
PATIENT INFORMATION AND DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT:
A 22-year-old female patient visited our department for assessment and management of unerupted third molars. An initial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT, HiRes3D, LARGEV, China) scan was obtained. Radiographic and clinical examinations showed the presence of an impacted supernumerary tooth on the left lingual side between the root of the lower second premolar and the lower first molar and bilateral lower impacted third molars. The patient agreed to have these teeth removed during multiple appointments. Thus, a dynamic surgical navigation system was recommended to extract an impacted supernumerary tooth (Figure 1).
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION:
The workflow of the dynamic navigation system (DHC-DI2, Dekaier, China) was as follows. 1) A U-shaped tube with radiopaque markers was affixed onto the supernumerary tooth side of the lower jaw using a silicone rubber impression material, followed by a CBCT image acquisition. 2) CBCT image data reconstruction and preoperative surgical planning on DNS were performed using DCARER implant design software. The teeth and jaw bone were reconstructed in 3 dimensions (3D) by importing CBCT image data (Figure 2A), followed by labeling the inferior alveolar nerve, and then we selected virtual implants to label the root and supernumerary tooth positions and axes (Figure 2B, 2C). If the adjacent tooth root is too thick, calibration can be done by adjusting the safe distance of the implant, which can help identify and provide safety suggestions during the surgical operation process (Figure 2D–2H). 3) We performed instrument calibration and spatial registration, calibrating the high-speed contra-angle handpiece (NSK, Japan) and registering the locator based on spatial markers by emitting infrared light to the detection camera [14].
SURGICAL PROTOCOL OF IMPACTED SUPERNUMERARY TOOTH EXTRACTION:
After disinfecting the patient’s oral cavity, local infiltration anesthesia was performed using Primacaine. We designed 33 to 36 lingual gingival triangular flap incisions, and after anesthesia took effect, we opened the flap along the designed incision to thoroughly expose the surgical area (Figure 3A–3C). DNS assisted in the precise localization of supernumerary tooth (Figure 3D, 3E). Due to the supernumerary tooth being located between the roots of the left mandibular second premolar and first molar, the surgeon used a high-speed contra-angle handpiece to gradually and accurately remove the bone overlying the supernumerary tooth to avoid root damage under real-time DNS guidance (Figure 3F–3I). Then, the surgeon extracted the supernumerary tooth using a surgical elevator (Figure 3J). Finally, the tooth extraction socket was cleaned and rinsed with normal saline, and the gingival flap was sutured (Figure 3K, 3L).
FOLLOW-UP AND OUTCOMES:
The entire operation took about 15 minutes. The patient felt good and did not experience discomfort. After the surgery, she was prescribed anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs and instructed to rinse her mouth 24 hours later.
In the subsequent follow-up 24 hours later, there was mild pain in the surgical area and no obvious redness or swelling at the wound. After 2 days, the pain had disappeared. The sutures were removed 1 week following the operation. Six months after surgery (Figure 4), the wound had healed well without complications such as adjacent teeth or nerve damage.
Discussion
Supernumerary teeth (STs) are defined as extra teeth in the jaw, with a prevalence rate of 0.1% to 1% of the population [19]. STs can appear anywhere in the oral and maxillofacial region, but the incidence of STs is significantly higher in specific regions, with the highest incidence in the maxillary incisor region, followed by the maxillary third molar, and mandibular molar, premolar, canine, and lateral incisor regions. In permanent dentition, the incidence of STs in males is twice that of females, but it is not significantly different by sex in deciduous dentition [20].
The proximity of deeply horizontally impacted teeth to the roots of adjacent teeth and critical anatomical structures presents a significant risk of damage during surgical procedures [21,22]. Preoperative imaging, typically through panoramic radiographs [3] or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), is essential for determining the position of the impacted tooth. However, these modalities do not facilitate real-time assessment of the relationship between the high-speed dental handpiece and critical anatomical structures during surgery. This limitation poses a considerable challenge, particularly for impacted teeth that are adjacent to or overlapping vital anatomical structures. Consequently, to minimize the risk to these adjacent teeth and structures, surgeons often need to enlarge the surgical flap and increase the extent of bone removal. These measures, while protective, invariably prolong the duration of surgery and exacerbate postoperative complications, including pain, swelling, and bleeding, and lead to extended healing times [23–25]. Currently, virtual and simulation technologies are more commonly applied in clinical teaching to improve the precise repositioning of impacted teeth in 3D, although their practical clinical application still needs further optimization [10,26].
A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies concluded that DNS achieved greater accuracy compared to the freehand approach, while showing comparable accuracies to static guidance in terms of platform deviation, apical deviation, and angular deviations [27].
In some cases, a digital guide plate was used to precisely extract impacted ST in the maxillary anterior region [19]. The use of digital guide plates for extraction of impacted ST is a good strategy, but it still cannot provide real-time dynamic guidance throughout the entire process. In previous reports, DNS-guided extraction of STs provided accurate and dynamic localization, but it still has certain limitations [17,18]. To improve real-time dynamic visual DNS guidance for the extraction of STs, we combined the DNS with a high-speed contra-angle handpiece and matched hardware and software. In this case, precise localization and bone removal were performed under DNS guidance throughout the entire process to avoid injuring the roots of the left mandibular second premolar and first molar. In addition, based on implant design software for preoperative design of STs extraction, the position and axial direction of adjacent teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve were marked, and a safe distance was set for intraoperative safety reminders. Finally, the surgical time was effectively decreased, and the operation was more precise, less invasive, and more comfortable.
Increased surgeon experience and continuous advances in oral surgical instruments synergistically enhance the process of extracting impacted teeth; however, the use of DNS in surgery offers several distinct advantages, particularly for experienced surgeons. DNS enhances confidence during complex procedures by providing 3D visualization of the surgical site, leading to a better understanding of anatomical structures. Compared to traditional methods, DNS significantly reduces the need for repeated X-rays, thereby lowering radiation exposure for both the patient and the surgical team. Additionally, DNS often includes features for recording the procedure, which can be valuable for educational purposes, postoperative analysis, and improvement of future surgical techniques. However, the use of DNS is not without limitations. It involves higher costs and requires additional time for presurgical planning. There is an initial learning curve associated with its use, and the optical array can be interfered with by the surgeon or assistants during surgery.
Conclusions
The dynamic navigation system coupled with high-speed contra-angle handpiece for the extraction of supernumerary teeth is a personalized, digitally-driven, precise, minimally invasive, and efficient treatment approach.
Figures
Figure 1.. Matching and combination of the dynamic navigation system and the high-speed contra-angle handpiece. Figure 2.. Preoperative design by DCARER implant design software. (A) Preoperative panoramic radiography; (B) Three-dimensional reconstruction; (C) Labeling inferior alveolar nerve; (D–H) Labeling the adjacent root and supernumerary tooth positions and axes by virtual implants and setting the safe distance. Figure 3.. The process of extracting the supernumerary tooth. (A) Oral surgical area. (B) Oral incision. (C) Cut and flip the flap according to the designed incision. (D, E) Exploring the position of ST under DNS guidance to determine the range of bone opening window. (F) Expose ST after removing the overlying bone of ST. (G–I) The distal part of ST’s crown is closely adjacent to the mesial root of the left mandibular first molar, and the mesial part of ST’s crown is also closely adjacent to the lingual side of the root of the left mandibular second premolar. Accurate bone removal is performed under real-time dynamic DNS guidance to avoid damaging the roots of the left mandibular first molar and second premolar (green represents safety, yellow represents proximity, red represents danger and simultaneous display of distance to the security edge). (J) ST was extracted through the elevator. (K) Clean and rinse tooth extraction socket. (L) Suture and close the wound, with ST removed in the lower left corner. Figure 4.. Six-month postoperative follow-up: (A) Intraoral radiography and (B, C) CBCT scans 6 months later.References:
1.. Ma X, Jiang Y, Ge H, Epidemiological, clinical, radiographic characterization of non-syndromic supernumerary teeth in Chinese children and adolescents: Oral Diseases, 2021; 27(4); 981-92
2.. Sambataro S, Bocchieri S, Cervino G, Correlations between malocclusion and postural anomalies in children with mixed dentition: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol, 2019; 4(3); 45
3.. Jerkovic D, Tadin A, Gavic L, Effect of orally administered magnesium on postoperative pain level and trismus after surgical removal of the lower third molars: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.: Clin Oral Investig, 2020; 24(12); 4649-59
4.. Ge J, Yang C, Zheng J, Qian W, Piezosurgery for the lingual split technique in lingual positioned impacted mandibular third molar removal: A retrospective study: Medicine, 2016; 95(12); e3192
5.. Huang C, Zhou C, Xu M, Zou D, Risk factors for lingual plate fracture during mandibular third molar extraction.: Clini Oral Investig, 2020; 24(6); 4133-42
6.. Simões IG, Kreve S, Cruz MAE, Influence of Er: YAG laser irradiation on surface properties of Ti-6Al-4V machined and hydroxyapatite coated: Lasers Med Sci, 2023; 38(1); 48
7.. Brignardello-Petersen JDHC-LAY, Efficacy of adjuvant laser therapy in reducing postsurgical complications after the removal of impacted mandibular third molars.: J Am Dent Assoc, 2017; 148(12); 887-902
8.. Azab M, Ibrahim S, Li A, Efficacy of secondary vs primary closure techniques for the prevention of postoperative complications after impacted mandibular third molar extractions: A systematic review update and meta-analysis: J Am Dent Assoc, 2022; 153(10); 943-56.e48
9.. Zeng J, Jiang Y, Liu Y, Research on a novel digital tooth sectioning guide system for tooth sectioning during mandibular third molar extraction: An in vitro study: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023; 124(1S); 101383
10.. Resnick C, Dang R, Glick S, Padwa B, Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue prediction for Le Fort I osteotomy using Dolphin 3D software: A pilot study: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017; 46(3); 289-95
11.. Anand M, Panwar S, Role of navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A surgeon’s perspectives: Clin Cosmet Investig Dent, 2021; 13; 127-39
12.. Ying X, Tian K, Zhang K, Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach: BMC Oral Health, 2021; 21(1); 1-11
13.. Emery R, Korj O, Agarwal R, A review of in-office dynamic image navigation for extraction of complex mandibular third molars: J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017; 75(8); 1591-600
14.. Tang W, Chao X, Ye Z, The use of dynamic navigation systems as a component of digital dentistry: J Dent Res, 2024; 103(2); 119-28
15.. Oillic A, Varazzani A, Fitouchi B, Navigation in oral surgery: A systematic review: Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery, 2023; 29(4); 44
16.. Guo Y, Xu D-D, Lv K, Use of computer-assisted navigation in the retrieval of accidentally displaced third molars: J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016; 74(5); 889-94
17.. Wang J, Cui N-H, Guo Y-J, Zhang W, Navigation-guided extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth: A case report: J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017; 75(6); 113641-e5
18.. Wang J, Zhang W, Wu S-S, Navigation in bone-impacted premaxillary supernumerary tooth removal: A preliminary clinical trial: Int J Comput Dent, 2021; 24(4); 363-74
19.. Zhu F, Hou D, Zhou C, Precise extraction of impacted supernumerary tooth in the maxillary anterior region with a digital guide plate: A case report: Medicine, 2022; 101(20); e29275
20.. Parolia A, Kundabala M, Dahal M, Management of supernumerary teeth.: J Conserv Dent, 2011; 14(3); 221-24
21.. Bhansali SP, Bhansali S, Tiwari A, Review of difficulty indices for removal of impacted third molars and a new classification of difficulty indices: J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2021; 20(2); 167-79
22.. Lupton C, Dolzan T, Malick M, Indications for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars in individuals aged 17–30: A systematic review., 2022
23.. Zheng X, Lin X, Wang Z, Extraction of low horizontally and buccally impacted mandibular third molars by three-piece tooth sectioning.: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020; 58(7); 829-33
24.. Yang Y, Bao D, Ni C, Li Z, Three-dimensional positional relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal: BMC Oral Health, 2023; 23(1); 831
25.. Piazza A, Mcanulty J, Early P, Guevar J, Craniectomies for dogs with skull multilobular osteochondrosarcoma using the misonix bone scalpel: Cadaveric evaluation and retrospective case series.: Top Companion Anim Med., 2023; 53–54; 100772
26.. Qi W, Qian J, Zhou W, 3D-printed titanium surgical guides for extraction of horizontally impacted lower third molars: Clin Oral Investig, 2022; 27(4); 1499-507
27.. Wang F, Wang Q, Zhang J, Role of dynamic navigation systems in enhancing the accuracy of implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies: J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021; 79(10); 2061-70
Figures
In Press
Case report
Rare Case of Fusobacterium necrophorum Bacteremia and Pleural Empyema Originating from a Burn Ulcer in a 16...Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.945283
Case report
Acute Epiploic Appendagitis Mimicking Ovarian Torsion: A Case Report Highlighting Diagnostic ChallengesAm J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944870
Case report
Rapid Recovery After Full Sternotomy Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Complex Cases: A Report of...Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.946043
Case report
Adrenal PEComa Treated by Surgical Resection and Postoperative Radiotherapy: A Case ReportAm J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.945177
Most Viewed Current Articles
21 Jun 2024 : Case report 78,043
Intracranial Parasitic Fetus in a Living Infant: A Case Study with Surgical Intervention and Prognosis Anal...DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report 46,099
Neurocysticercosis Presenting as Migraine in the United StatesDOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133
10 Jan 2022 : Case report 32,953
A Report on the First 7 Sequential Patients Treated Within the C-Reactive Protein Apheresis in COVID (CACOV...DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935263
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935263
23 Feb 2022 : Case report 21,399
Penile Necrosis Associated with Local Intravenous Injection of CocaineDOI :10.12659/AJCR.935250
Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250