03 April 2025: Articles
A Rare Case of Ovarian Serous Borderline Tumor Recurrence with Muscle Metastasis
Unusual clinical course
Akitoshi Yamamura



DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.946680
Am J Case Rep 2025; 26:e946680
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ovarian serous borderline tumors (SBTs) generally have a favorable prognosis, with a very low recurrence rate. However, in rare cases, they can recur as invasive low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) after a prolonged follow-up period. Here, we report a case of LGSC originating from SBT that recurred 23 years after the initial surgery, with metastasis to the quadratus lumborum muscle – an exceptionally rare site of metastasis.
CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old woman, initially diagnosed with stage IIIC SBT and treated with complete tumor resection 23 years prior, presented with an asymptomatic recurrence detected by an elevated serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125) level. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple nodules suspected of peritoneal dissemination and a tumor infiltrating the quadratus lumborum muscle, suggesting recurrent SBT. A CT-guided needle biopsy confirmed that the tumor within the quadratus lumborum was a recurrence of SBT. Complete cytoreductive surgery was performed with the assistance of an orthopedic surgeon. Histopathological examination revealed progression to LGSC with cytoplasmic expression of the BRAF proto-oncogene (BRAF) V600E, indicating the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation, which is a characteristic feature of both SBT and LGSC. A retrospective review of CT images taken 10 years prior to the recurrence diagnosis showed a peritoneal tumor with calcification attached to the ileocecum, suggesting that the patient had remained asymptomatic for more than a decade after the actual onset of recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates a rare instance of recurrent SBT with metastasis to the quadratus lumborum muscle. Given the exceptionally slow progression of recurrent SBT, long-term follow-up with CT imaging and serum CA125 monitoring is crucial for timely intervention and appropriate management upon recurrence.
Keywords: Ovarian Neoplasms, SBT, LGSC, Recurrence, Muscle Metastasis
Introduction
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are characterized by histological features intermediate between benign cystadenomas and carcinomas. Due to their low malignant potential, recurrence may occur over an extended disease course, but it rarely leads to death. The reported 5-year and 10-year survival rates for BOTs, including all stages, are 95% and 90%, respectively. Even for stage IV cases, a 10-year survival rate of 77% has been documented [1,2].
Serous borderline tumor (SBT) is the most common type of BOT and accounts for 50% of all BOTs [3]. According to the 2020 WHO classification, SBT has 2 morphologic subtypes. Conventional SBT shows hierarchically branching papillae lined by stratified, heterogenous epithelium with up to moderate atypia, whereas micropapillary SBT shows multiple nonbranching filiform structures without fibrovascular cores that are 5 times longer than they are wide, originating directly from bulbous central stalks. Compared to conventional SBT, SBT with micropapillary pattern is reported to be associated with a higher recurrence rate and accounts for about 10% of all SBT [4]. Moreover, SBT is known to be a precursor lesion to low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), with sequence mutations in Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene
In this report, we present a case of conventional SBT with noninvasive peritoneal implants that, after 23 years of follow-up, recurred with multiple peritoneal dissemination and a solitary quadratus lumborum muscle metastasis in the form of LGSC. Muscular metastasis is very rare in recurrence for SBT and LGSC because the site of recurrence for SBT and LGSC is primarily intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal lymphatic [10]. There are multiple reports on the metastatic sites for SBT and LGSC, whereas there is just a single report of SBT with muscle metastasis. We did complete cytoreductive surgery with the cooperation of orthopedic surgeons, because SBT and LGSC are poorly sensitive to chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) unlike high-grade serous carcinoma, and complete second cytoreductive surgery at recurrence is associated with improved progression-free survival and overall survival [11,12]. Retrospectively, a calcified tumor adhering to the ileocecum in computed tomography (CT) images and an elevated serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125) level was observed 10 years prior to the diagnosis of recurrence. This case provides a unique insight into the natural progression of recurrent SBT.
Case Report
This 50-year-old nulliparous woman with abdominal distention was diagnosed with SBT at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC and underwent complete cytoreductive surgery 23 years ago, when she was 27 years old. She had no particular medical, family, or psychosocial history. The complete cytoreductive surgery included total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, partial omentectomy, and sigmoid and rectal resection. The postoperative pathological diagnosis was conventional SBT, which did not show a micro-papillary pattern, and non-invasive peritoneal implants and pelvic lymph node metastases were observed. At this stage, due to the absence of significant nuclear atypia and invasive features, the diagnosis was established as SBT rather than LGSC (Figure 1A). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with 3 courses of paclitaxel and carboplatin was administered. The serum level of CA125, which had been elevated preoperatively at 74 U/mL, had normalized and no recurrence was observed over a long period. The patient visited the hospital regularly for follow-up and estrogen replacement therapy because she had had both ovaries removed. During the follow-up period, serum CA125 level was measured, and CT scans were performed once a year for up to 15 years after the initial treatment, and serum CA125 level was measured once every few years after 15 years. Serum CA125 levels began to exceed 10 U/mL 16 years after the initial treatment. After that, the CA125 level gradually increased, albeit very slowly.
Twenty-three years after surgery, her serum CA125 level exceeded 35 U/mL (Figure 2). Although she had no symptoms at all, we performed a detailed examination with contrast-enhanced CT, which revealed numerous nodules suspected of peritoneal dissemination and a tumor infiltrating the quadratus lumborum muscle, suggesting recurrence of SBT (Figure 3). Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT also showed accumulation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) at the sites of suspected recurrence and did not detect another metastasis (Figure 3). Peritoneal dissemination is a common site of recurrence in SBT, but metastasis to the quadratus lumborum muscle is extremely rare, so we decided to histologically confirm whether it was indeed the recurrence. A CT-guided needle biopsy of the quadratus lumborum muscle tumor and peritoneal dissemination led to a diagnosis of recurrent SBT.
We scheduled a secondary debulking surgery, because SBT and LGSC are poorly sensitive to chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) and complete second cytoreductive surgery at recurrence are associated with improved progression-free survival and overall survival. Due to the extensive spread of the lesion and the operative positions, we determined that a one-stage surgery would be difficult. Since there was a high risk of infection in abdominal surgery, and even though there were no symptoms, there was a possibility that spinal symptoms would appear in the future if the tumor grew and invaded the spine. Orthopedic surgeons first performed tumor resection in the quadratus lumborum and psoas major muscles via a retroperitoneal approach, followed by intra-spinal canal tumor curettage with posterior spinal fusion at the T12-L1 segment (Figures 4A, 5A). The tumor had not extended intraperitoneally. The operation time was 7 hours 50 minutes, and the blood loss was 180 mL. The surgery was completed without complications, and complete resection of the invasive tumor within the quadratus lumborum muscle was achieved. In the resected specimen, edematous or gelatinous white papillary structures were observed against a background of muscle tissue. Microscopically, a papillary structure lined by low-grade atypical epithelium was identified, with irregular glandular ducts and individual cells proliferating within a fibrous stroma. While the histological features were consistent with a recurrence of SBT, the diagnosis was determined to be LGSC due to the invasive growth within the muscle tissue.
One month after orthopedic surgery, we performed a resection of the peritoneal dissemination. Intra-abdominal findings showed numerous small disseminations on the diaphragm and 2 on the surface of the liver. We found a 3-cm tumor on the lesser curvature of the stomach, a 5-cm tumor on the greater curvature, a 7-cm tumor in the left paracolic gutter (Figures 4B–4D, 5B–5D). The tumor on the greater curvature had infiltrated the gastric wall. Other disseminations were also observed on the cecum and ileum, as well as in the mesentery of the small intestine. A small amount of bloody ascites was observed. Surgery included diaphragm stripping, hepatic surface tumor resection, resection of perigastric tumors with partial gastrectomy, combined resection of the cecum and small intestine, preserving the ileocecal region, and pelvic peritoneal stripping. We achieved complete cytoreductive surgery. An ostomy was not created; instead, the transected segments of the small intestine were anastomosed. The duration of the surgery was 11 hours 10 minutes, with a recorded blood loss of 2050 mL. The cytological examination of the ascites was positive for adenocarcinoma. In the microscopic examination of the resected specimen, the areas suspected of peritoneal dissemination on the liver surface were found to be inflammatory changes. However, in other areas, proliferation in papillary, cribriform, and glandular patterns with associated calcification was observed, consistent with the findings of LGSC. Immunohistochemical staining results indicated positive staining for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and BRAF V600E (Figure 1B–1E). The BRAF V600E cytoplasmic pattern indicates the presence of the
We proposed postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab 6 weeks after the second surgery, but the patient opted against it. Consequently, no adjuvant therapy was administered, and the patient remained under close observation.
Discussion
We managed a case of ovarian LGSC originating from SBT that recurred 23 years after initial treatment. Metastasis was observed within the peritoneal cavity and in the quadratus lumborum muscle, which is an extremely rare site of recurrence. SBT usually spreads transperineally, and sometimes has lymphogenous metastasis. The mechanism of metastasis to muscles has not been fully elucidated, but hematogenous metastasis is thought to be the most likely route because the tumor in our patient had not extended intraperitoneally. The literature contains only 1 case report of LGSC with paraspinal metastasis on the right arch of the 12th thoracic vertebra, which showed right-lateral chest pain and neurologic abnormalities in the lower limbs [13], without peritoneal metastasis. Some other reports showed breast or brain metastasis, which are also thought to be a hematogenous route [14,15], indicating that SBT/LGSC can very rarely metastasize in a way that differs from peritoneal dissemination or lymph node metastasis.
We completed cytoreductive surgery with the help of an orthopedic surgeon because LGSC is less responsive to conventional chemotherapy. If complete cytoreductive surgery is not possible, systemic therapy must be chosen. In 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the combination of dabrafenib (a BRAF inhibitor) and trametinib (a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitor) for unresectable or metastatic solid tumors with
The need for adjuvant chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery for recurrent LGSC has been controversial. We predicted that the addition of bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel would be effective based on the data from the MITO22 trial, and we proposed it to the patient. We did not propose the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib due to BRAF V600E expression of the recurrent tumor, since it was not approved for use in adjuvant therapy in our country. The 2019 edition of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) guidelines do not recommend the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy for SBT, as the benefits of such treatment have not been clearly established [22]. Although it has been reported that adjuvant chemotherapy after primary cytoreductive surgery does not improve overall survival in patients with advanced-stage LGSC, as mentioned above, clinical trials are being conducted as postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the results are awaited.
In this case, although the initial signs of recurrence were not recognized, long-term follow-up enabled the diagnosis of asymptomatic recurrence 23 years after surgery. This follow-up also served as part of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT). Hormone replacement therapy has been reported to increase the incidence of SBT [11]. Although the immunohistochemical staining of the recurrent tumor in this case was positive for ER, suggesting that ERT could potentially have an adverse effect on the recurrence of SBT, there are no reports that estrogen administration after SBT surgery is a risk factor for recurrence. Considering the course of our case, it can be inferred that ERT did not cause the rapid growth of the tumor, as the tumor continued to recur for 23 years despite the administration of ERT.
It should be noted that there is no clear consensus regarding the optimal follow-up period for SBT. We reviewed the recurrence rate and time to recurrence of SBT based on previous reports (Table 1) [22–25]. Advanced stages tend to be associated with a slightly higher recurrence rate, and a longer follow-up period may also be linked to a modest increase in the incidence of recurrence. Long-term follow-up is necessary because a short follow-up period may miss recurrence. In fact, 5% of SBT patients with stage II or higher have recurrence more than 15 years later [23]. It may be better not to terminate follow-up after 15 years. Previous reports suggest a correlation between proliferative activity and serum CA125 levels in SBT [26]. In cases of SBT with indolent progression and minimal increases in CA125 levels, it might be possible to detect recurrence through periodic CT examination conducted every few years, thereby facilitating timely therapeutic intervention. In routine gynecological ultrasound examinations, the observation is usually limited to the pelvic region, allowing for detection of abnormalities within the pelvis. However, in cases like ours, where metastasis to the quadratus lumborum muscle has occurred, a whole-body examination using CT or other imaging modalities is necessary.
Conclusions
We managed a rare case of SBT recurrence and metastasis to the quadratus lumborum. Recurrence usually occurs as peritoneal dissemination or lymph node metastasis, but it is necessary to be careful because in rare cases it can metastasize to such unusual sites.
In this case, we suspected recurrence based on the rise in serum CA125 level, and diagnosed recurrence using CT and CT-guided biopsy. Complete cytoreductive surgery is the first choice for treatment at the time of recurrence, but in cases where complete resection is difficult, a combination therapy with a BRAF inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor is also useful, as some SBTs and LGSCs have
Recurrent SBT progresses extremely slowly, and in some cases recurrence occurs more than 15 years after initial diagnosis, so it is important to carefully consider when to end follow-up observation.
Figures
References:
1.. Bourdel N, Huchon C, Abdel Wahab C, Borderline ovarian tumors: Guidelines from the French national college of obstetricians and gynecologists (CNGOF): Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2021; 256; 492-501
2.. Trimble CL, Kosary C, Trimble EL, Long-term survival and patterns of care in women with ovarian tumors of low malignant potential: Gynecol Oncol, 2002; 86; 34-37
3.. Gershenson DM, Management of borderline ovarian tumours: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2017; 41; 49-59
4.. Vang R, Hannibal CG, Junge J, Long-term behavior of serous borderline tumors subdivided into atypical proliferative tumors and noninvasive low-grade carcinomas: A population-based clinicopathologic study of 942 cases: Am J Surg Pathol, 2017; 41; 725-37
5.. Longacre TA, McKenney JK, Tazelaar HD, Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): Outcome-based study of 276 patients with long-term (> or =5-year) follow-up: Am J Surg Pathol, 2005; 29; 707-23
6.. Singer G, Stöhr R, Cope L, Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low- and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: A mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation: Am J Surg Pathol, 2005; 29; 218-24
7.. McHenry A, Rottmann DA, Buza N, Hui P, KRAS mutation in primary ovarian serous borderline tumors correlates with tumor recurrence: Virchows Arch, 2023; 483(1); 71-79
8.. Tsang YT, Deavers MT, Sun CC, KRAS (but not BRAF) mutations in ovarian serous borderline tumour are associated with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma: J Pathol, 2013; 231(4); 449-56
9.. Chui MH, Kjaer SK, Frederiksen K, BRAFV600E -mutated ovarian serous borderline tumors are at relatively low risk for progression to serous carcinoma: Oncotarget 3, 2019; 10(64); 6870-78
10.. Leake JF, Currie JL, Rosenshein NB, Woodruff JD, Long-term follow-up of serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential: Gynecol Oncol, 1992; 47; 150-58
11.. Rasmussen ELK, Hannibal CG, Dehlendorff C, Parity, infertility, oral contraceptives, and hormone replacement therapy and the risk of ovarian serous borderline tumors: A nationwide case-control study: Gynecol Oncol, 2017; 144; 571-76
12.. Baba T, Koshiyama M, Kagabu M, Ovarian serous borderline tumors with recurrent or extraovarian lesions: A Japanese, retrospective, multi-institutional, population-based study: Int J Clin Oncol, 2023; 28; 1411-20
13.. Kubo C, Nagata S, Fukuda T, Late recurrence of pStage 1 low-grade serous ovarian tumor presenting as a symptomatic bone metastasis: A case report: Diagn Pathol, 2018; 13; 43
14.. Dong F, Xie X, Wei X, Metastatic serous borderline tumor with micro-invasive ovarian carcinoma presenting as a breast lump: A case report: Medicine, 2020; 99(9); e19383
15.. Veran-Taguibao S, Taguibao RAA, Gallegos N, A rare case of ovarian serous borderline tumor with brain metastasis: Case Rep Pathol, 2019; 2019; 2954373
16.. Grisham RN, Iyer G, Garg K, BRAF mutation is associated with early stage disease and improved outcome in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer: Cancer, 2013; 119; 548-54
17.. Gershenson DM, Miller A, Brady WE, Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): An international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial: Lancet, 2022; 399; 541-53
18.. Sama S, Rosqvist S, Savage T, Durable response to BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in recurrent metastatic low grade serous ovarian cancer: Gynecol Oncol Rep, 2024; 53; 101412
19.. Musacchio L, Turinetto M, Arenare L, Effect of bevacizumab in advanced low grade serous ovarian cancer: Data from the MITO 22 trial: Gynecol Oncol, 2023; 172; 72-77
20.. McLaughlin PMJ, Klar M, Zwimpfer TA, Maintenance Therapy with Aromatase Inhibitor in epithelial Ovarian Cancer (MATAO): Study protocol of a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled multi-center phase III Trial: BMC Cancer, 2022; 22(1); 508
21.. Fader A, Gershenson D, A randomized phase III, two-arm trial of paclitaxel/carboplatin/maintenance letrozole versus letrozole monotherapy in patients with stage II–IV, primary low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: A NRG oncology study (1321).: Gynecol Oncol., 2023 Abstract only
22.. Colombo N, Sessa C, du Bois A, ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: Pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease: Ann Oncol, 2019; 30; 672-705
23.. Silva EG, Gershenson DM, Malpica A, Deavers M, The recurrence and the overall survival rates of ovarian serous borderline neoplasms with noninvasive implants is time dependent: Am J Surg Pathol, 2006; 30; 1367-71
24.. Song T, Lee YY, Choi CH, Prognosis in patients with serous and mucinous stage I borderline ovarian tumors: Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2012; 22; 770-77
25.. Gilks CB, Alkushi A, Yue JJ, Lanvin D, Ehlen TG, Miller DM, Advanced-stage serous borderline tumors of the ovary: A clinicopathological study of 49 cases: Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2003; 22; 29-36
26.. But I, Serum CA 125 level as a reflection of proliferative activity of serous borderline ovarian tumor: Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2000; 71; 289-91
Figures
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.946411
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.946041
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.947953
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.946932
Most Viewed Current Articles
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
96,778
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
52,393
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133
20 Nov 2023 : Case report
31,818
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.941424
Am J Case Rep 2023; 24:e941424
18 Feb 2024 : Case report
23,483
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943030
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943030