Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

15 May 2026: Articles  Chad

Successful Separation of Female Omphalopagus Conjoined Twins at the Mother and Child University Hospital Center in N’Djamena, Chad: A Case Report

Challenging differential diagnosis, Rare disease

Olivier Ngaringuem ORCID logo AEF 1,2*, Mahamat Nour Abakar Djibrine ORCID logo AF 1,2, Lamega Bembo F 1, Ngaringuem Adrienne F 1,2, Souam Silé Ngembayo F 1,2, Soukaya Brahim F 2,3, Adjougoulta Bonté F 2,4, Kalki Djian-Noné F 1

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952035

Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e952035

0 Comments

Abstract

0:00

BACKGROUND: Conjoined twin pregnancies are rare, and the twins can be connected via shared organs or anatomical structures. Omphalopagus conjoined twins represent 10% of cases and are connected at the abdominal wall, typically between the xiphoid process and the umbilicus. They can share the liver, biliary tract, and upper gastrointestinal system. This report describes the successful separation of female omphalopagus conjoined twins at a specialist center in N’Djamena, Chad.

CASE REPORT: One-day-old female omphalopagus conjoined twins were admitted to the Mother and Child University Hospital in N’Djamena. The mother had received no prenatal consultations, and delivery occurred at home via the vaginal route. Evaluation by abdominal computed tomography revealed fusion at the abdominal wall and a shared liver. The heart and other vital organs were separate. A successful elective surgical separation was performed by a multidisciplinary team. The twins had a favorable postoperative course and were discharged on day 25. At 24-month follow-up, they show good psychomotor development despite a transient episode of malnutrition.

CONCLUSIONS: Successful separation confirms the favorable prognosis of omphalopagus twins, especially when preoperative imaging demonstrates distinct vital organs. Achieving this surgical outcome in a low-resource setting highlights the critical role of a rigorous multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of conjoined twins and the importance of careful follow-up after twin separation.

Keywords: infant health, Twins, Conjoined, Abdominal Wall, Chad

Introduction

Conjoined twins, also referred to as conjoint twins, are defined by the specific region of the body that is fused (shared). They arise from rare cases of incomplete monozygotic twinning, in which the embryonic disk does not fully divide, or adjacent embryonic disks fuse [1]. The classification is based on the site of fusion: thoracopagus (joined at the chest), craniopagus (fused at the head), and omphalopagus (joined at the abdomen) [2]. Recent studies report a prevalence ranging from 1.02 to 1.34 per 100 000 births in Western populations to 3.27 per 100 000 births in China, with a marked female predominance at a ratio of 3: 1 [3]. Additionally, 40% to 60% of conjoined twins are stillborn, and nearly 35% of live births do not survive beyond 24 hours [4]. Antenatal diagnosis of conjoined twins relies primarily on ultrasonography. Early detection is possible in the first trimester between weeks 10 and 13 of amenorrhea [5]. Medical imaging plays a vital role in the management of conjoined twins by enabling anatomical assessment, delineation of shared organs, and evaluation of the feasibility of surgical intervention. It also provides essential guidance for successful separation [6]. Independent survival is only possible through surgical separation, provided there are no malformations, no bony fusion, and separate hearts and brains present [7]. This report describes the successful separation of female omphalopagus conjoined twins at a specialist center in N’Djamena, Chad.

Case Report

These were 1-day-old conjoined twin girls referred to the Neonatology Department of the Mother and Child University Hospital Center of N’Djamena for treatment. It is the only hospital in the country featuring both a pediatric surgery department and a neonatal intensive care unit. The pediatric department has a capacity of 177 beds.

The mother was 35 years old, multiparous, with a gravidity of 9, parity of 9, and 8 living children. She had not received any prenatal care. Gestational age was not documented. The delivery was a home vaginal birth in a village approximately 300 km from the capital. Delivery was conducted by a community-trained traditional birth attendant. Following the birth, the parents visited a health center, where they were referred to the Mother and Child University Hospital Center in N’Djamena. The conjoined twins were transported via a non-medicalized ambulance, accompanied by a nurse.

Upon clinical examination, the twins presented in good general condition, with a combined weight of 4800 g. They exhibited normal tone, good reactivity, adequate coloration, effective sucking and swallowing, and intact primitive reflexes; their fontanelles appeared normal. Oxygen saturation was within normal limits. Each newborn possessed a well-developed head and neck and fully formed thoracic and pelvic limbs. The twins were conjoined over a length of approximately 4 cm along the midline, extending from the xiphoid process to the umbilical region. At the lower margin of the fused area, an omphalocele measuring approximately 1×1 cm was observed, to which the umbilical cord was attached. The thoracic and pelvic limbs were free of axis or structural abnormalities and showed no apparent malformations (Figure 1).

Abdominal computed tomography identified a connection between the inner abdominal wall and a liver of normal size and texture (Figure 2). All other organs appeared entirely normal and well separated. Cardiology consultation and echocardiography were conducted, revealing no cardiac malformations. The decision to proceed with elective surgical intervention was made following a multidisciplinary meeting that included radiologists, anesthesiologists, intensivists, pediatricians, and pediatric surgeons. The specific steps of the procedure were discussed and planned by the team during a subsequent preoperative meeting. Four multidisciplinary team meetings were organized. On the seventh day of life, the twins were admitted to the operating room, where 2 operating tables were prepared in the same room, each with a dedicated surgical team. The twins were positioned laterally and underwent general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. An incision was made along the entire length of the anterior surface at the site of fusion. After achieving hemostasis, the common aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis muscles was incised, and the peritoneum was opened.

Surgical exploration enabled the identification of clearly distinct organs, with an attachment present at the margins of both livers and a cartilaginous bridge replacing the 2 xiphoid appendages. The 2 livers were carefully separated, the cartilaginous bridge was divided, and posterior separation was completed. The twins were separated within 45 minutes.

The 2 separated twins were positioned in the dorsal decubitus position on separate operating tables for anterior abdominal wall repair, with polyglactin 0 used for the aponeurosis, and skin plasty performed with polyglactin 4/0 (Figure 3). The total operative time was 1 hour and 10 minutes. Both infants were extubated in the operating room and experienced an uncomplicated immediate postoperative course. Oral feeding with breast milk supplemented by infant formula was initiated on the first postoperative day and was well tolerated. The dressings were changed on postoperative days 3 and 10. Wound healing was complete by postoperative day 12; however, due to their distant place of origin, the twins remained hospitalized, with discharge permitted on day 25 of life and postoperative day 18, at weights of 2750 g and 2820 g, respectively. No complications were noted, and wound healing was satisfactory at the time of discharge. With the twins receiving regular follow-up, we noted an episode of severe malnutrition in both twins in month 9, which required hospitalization in the therapeutic nutrition unit for 1 month.

At 24 months, the infants showed good psychomotor development, and the examination of the abdominal wall was unremarkable (Figure 4).

Discussion

From this clinical case, the main lesson to remember is that, from beginning to end, teams must work in synergy. Conjoined twins are an exceptionally rare congenital anomaly, with an estimated incidence ranging from 1 in 50 000 to 1 in 200 000 live births. They arise from incomplete division of a monozygotic, monoamniotic zygote after day 13 of gestation [8]. The initial step in management is precise antenatal diagnosis, typically achievable via ultrasound in the first trimester [9,10]. This approach enables not only confirmation of the fusion, but also informs genetic counseling, delivery planning, and surgical preparation. In our case, antenatal diagnosis was not established, due to a lack of prenatal consultation, a circumstance frequently observed in resource-limited settings. This shortcoming complicates care, as deliveries often take place at home and under unsafe conditions. In cases in which diagnosis occurs before birth, parental counseling is essential, and cesarean delivery is generally recommended. Cesarean delivery helps to prevent dystocia and obstetric trauma, thereby improving the likelihood of survival and subsequent surgical separation [11,12]. The absence of prenatal care in this case highlights a significant gap in management. Adequate antenatal monitoring is crucial for the early detection of conjoined twins and for planning delivery in a tertiary care center. Vaginal delivery is reserved for cases with a poor prognosis [5]. The optimal timing for surgical separation remains a subject of debate. Elective separation, delayed by several months, often provides better survival prospects by facilitating multidisciplinary preparation and optimizing operative conditions. However, urgent separation may be required when the life of one twin endangers the other. Major cardiac malformations generally contraindicate separation [13]. In our case, the absence of cardiac anomalies made surgery feasible. The female predominance observed in our case aligns with the literature, which reports a female-to-male ratio of 1.6 to 3 [11]. Omphalopagus is the second most common type of conjoined twin case, involving fusion from the lower thorax to the umbilicus [14]. This type is thought to offer the most favorable prognosis, particularly when the heart and central nervous system are separate [7,14]. Successful separation largely depends on meticulous planning, multidisciplinary collaboration, involving surgeons, anesthetists, pediatricians, radiologists, and intensivists, and appropriate preoperative imaging, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, to define shared anatomy and assess surgical feasibility [6,15]. Similar outcomes were reported in Guinea-Conakry, involving the separation of pygopagus twins in a facility with comparable technical resources [16]. Closure of the skin remains a major challenge. Some teams use tissue expanders or synthetic meshes to achieve sufficient coverage [17]. In our case, closure was achieved without these additional techniques. The team of Pati et al performed the same type of abdominal closure [18]. Published series report post-separation survival rates ranging from 70% to over 90%, according to the type of fusion and resources available [19,20]. The more than 5 months of follow-up by our team allowed for optimal monitoring. This extended follow-up time is longer than that of other teams [21]. Our experience, the first of its kind in Chad, demonstrates that successful separation can be accomplished even in resource-limited settings if performed by a well-prepared multidisciplinary team. The surgical success was facilitated by the fact that the twins were omphalopagus, with no complex involvement or shared vascularization of the internal organs.

Conclusions

Conjoined twins are a very rare and complex malformation, posing significant diagnostic and surgical management challenges, particularly in low-resource settings. In our context, the absence of prenatal monitoring further complicated these challenges. Favorable progress at 24 months emphasizes that this type of conjoined twin has the highest likelihood of survival following separation. This outcome was achieved through multidisciplinary care and meticulously planned surgery. Beyond the surgical accomplishment, this case underscores the urgent need to improve access to prenatal care in our region. The central message for clinicians is that successful management of such complex cases relies on resource sharing and interdisciplinary collaboration. Enhanced monitoring would facilitate antenatal diagnosis and optimal preparation, including planned cesarean delivery.

References

1. Dinsa LH, Mengesha AT, Conjoined twin at abdomen: twin a anencephaly and face presentation with twin B cephalic presentation: A case report and review of the literature: J Med Case Rep, 2024; 18(1); 597

2. Woo YT, Evaluation of the ethical controversies in separation surgery of conjoined twins: a review of the literature: Cureus, 2025; 17(1); e77382

3. Oprita B, Berea TN, Oprita R, Neonatal air transport of thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twins: A case of adaptation and multidisciplinary coordination: Children (Basel), 2025; 12(4); 423

4. Muhammad S, Laraswati B, Violetta L, Radiology assessment of omphalopagus conjoined twins: A case report: Radiol Case Rep, 2022; 17(4); 1169-74

5. Mikolo AML, Minko JI, Kamgaing EK, Thoracopagus conjoined twins: About a case in Libreville and review of the literature: Pan Afr Med J, 2022; 41(1); 220

6. Mohammad SA, AbouZeid AA, Ahmed KA, Postnatal imaging of conjoined twins: A customized multimodality approach: Pediatr Radiol, 2023; 53(11); 2291-304

7. Kattel P, Conjoined twins: J Nepal Med Assoc, 2018; 56(211); 708-10

8. Rhaidouni A, Ait Benkaddour Y, Chahid N, Diagnostic anténatal des jumeaux siamois: À propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature: Int J Acad Health Med Res, 2021; 5(4); 25-29 [in French]

9. Pajkrt E, Jauniaux E, First-trimester diagnosis of conjoined twins: Prenat Diagn, 2005; 25; 820-26

10. Attar I, Chaara H, Jayi S, Grossesse gémellaire avec siamois parapages dicéphaliques diagnostiquée au 2e trimestre: À propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature: Int J Med Rev Case Rep, 2021; 5(6); 23-27 [in French]

11. Benchiba I, Saoud MK, Mamouni N, Term diagnosis of conjoined twins: Pan Afr Med J, 2020; 35; 8

12. O’Brien MJ, The management of conjoined twins: A review of the literature and a proposal for a new classification system: J Pediatr Surg, 1982; 17(6); 838-44

13. Spitz L, Conjoined twins: Prenat Diagn, 2005; 25(9); 814-19

14. Kingston CA, McHugh K, Kumaradevan J, Imaging in the preoperative assessment of conjoined twins: Radiographics, 2001; 21(5); 1187-208

15. Wandaogo A, Ouedraogo SF, Tapsoba WT, Conjoined omphalopagus twins separated at birth at the Charles de Gaulle Pediatric University Hospital Center, Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso): J Afr Fr Chir Ped, 2019; 4(1); 728-31

16. Shi CR, Cai W, Jin HM, Surgical management to conjoined twin in Shanghai area: Pediatr Surg Int, 2006; 22(10); 791-95

17. Touré MA, Keita B, Touré BM, Successful Separation of siamese twins at Conakry University Hospital: J Pediatr Neonatal, 2022; 4(1); 1-4

18. Jackson OA, Low DW, LaRossa D, Conjoined twin separation: Lessons learned: Plast Reconstr Surg, 2012; 129(4); 956-63

19. Patil PS, Kothari P, Gupta A, Successful separation of omphalopagus twins: A case report: J Neonatal Surg, 2016; 5(1); 5

20. Fallon SC, Olutoye OO, The surgical principles of conjoined twin separation: Semin Perinatol, 2018; 42(6); 386-96

21. Rintoul NE, Crombleholme TM, Experience in the management of conjoined twins: J Pediatr, 2002; 140(5); 572-76

22. Omran A, Nassif M, Salhab N, Early separation of omphalopagus conjoined twins: A case report from Syria: J Surg Case Rep, 2020; 2020(1); rjz374

In Press

Case report  China

Thrombolytic Therapy After Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients With STEMI From Medically Underdev...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976  

Case report  Greece

Multilevel Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Low Back Pain in Achondroplasia: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290  

Case report  Italy

Fractional CO₂ Laser (SCAR3 Scanner) for a Hypertrophic Retracting Cleft Lip Scar: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607  

Case report  Saudi Arabia

Postoperative Corneal Dellen Following PreserFlo MicroShunt: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985  

Most Viewed Current Articles

07 Dec 2021 : Case report  USA 17,691,734

Edwardsiella tarda: A Classic Presentation of a Rare Fatal Infection, with Possible New Background Risk Fac...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347

06 Dec 2021 : Case report  Brazil 164,491

Lipedema Can Be Treated Non-Surgically: A Report of 5 Cases

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406

21 Jun 2024 : Case report  China (mainland) 113,090

Intracranial Parasitic Fetus in a Living Infant: A Case Study with Surgical Intervention and Prognosis Anal...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371

0:00

07 Mar 2024 : Case report  USA 59,175

Neurocysticercosis Presenting as Migraine in the United States

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923