08 May 2026
: Case report
[In Press] Intraluminal Appendiceal Migration of an Intrauterine Device Without Appendicitis: A Case Report
Unusual clinical course, Challenging differential diagnosis, Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents, Management of emergency care, Clinical situation which can not be reproduced for ethical reasons
Ángel Sánchez TinajeroDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.951714
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.951714
Available online: 2026-05-08, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The intrauterine device (IUD) is a commonly used contraceptive method in emerging countries, such as Mexico and several Latin American nations. IUD insertion is a well-described and relatively simple procedure; however, one of its rare complications is migration to nearby extrauterine structures.
CASE REPORT
The patient was a 37-year-old woman with a history of cesarean delivery 5 years earlier. After an abortion managed by instrumental uterine curettage in 2024, a copper intrauterine device (IUD) was placed, with no immediate complications. However, 1 month later, she experienced intermittent mild cramping in the lower abdomen, which intensified 1 year later (2025) and for which she sought medical evaluation. The initial examination included a pelvic ultrasound, which revealed the absence of the IUD within the uterine cavity. After a hysteroscopy and computed tomography (CT), the gynecology and obstetrics department performed an exploratory laparotomy. The transoperative findings were as follows: right iliac fossa with displaced IUD, whose arms were located in the right fimbria, while the body of the device was apparently visible within the appendicular lumen. The cecal appendix showed no macroscopic evidence of pathology. The patient’s progress was satisfactory, with no immediate or delayed complications.
CONCLUSIONS
This case is the first record in the medical and scientific literature in which the IUD was found intraluminally in the appendix, without macroscopic or clinical data of acute appendicitis. This case also highlights the need for early diagnosis and timely treatment of seemingly rare conditions, to reduce complications arising from procedures considered routine, such as IUD insertion.
Keywords: Appendix; Intrauterine Device Migration; Intrauterine Devices, Copper
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






