28 May 2026
: Case report
[In Press] Anesthesia Management of Awake Craniotomy for Excision of a Supratentorial Hemorrhagic Brain Tumor Affecting Speech and Memory
Unusual clinical course, Management of emergency care, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Alex Hugues1ABDEF, Taylor Rechter2DEF, Aldo Poblete1DEF, Imani Thornton1ADEDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952107
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952107
Available online: 2026-05-28, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Awake craniotomy is a neurosurgical approach used for resecting brain tumors in eloquent areas, where real-time neurological monitoring is critical to preserving function. Selecting the appropriate anesthesia approach is essential when preoperative language deficits or patient anxiety may limit intraoperative participation. While motor mapping is an established component of awake craniotomy, the use of a speech-language pathologist for real-time intraoperative monitoring remains underutilized.
CASE REPORT
A 31-year-old woman presented with a 1-year history of seizures, headaches, and progressive speech disturbances. Imaging revealed a left-sided supratentorial hemorrhagic brain tumor measuring 4.1×3.8×3.6 cm located near language centers. Given the proximity to the eloquent cortex and the patient’s significant preoperative speech and memory deficits, a sleep-awake-sleep (SAS) anesthesia technique was chosen for awake craniotomy with intraoperative speech mapping. Uniquely, a speech-language pathologist (SLP) was integrated into the surgical team to conduct real-time assessments of language function. After induction with propofol and remifentanil, the patient was awakened during resection for real-time speech testing, allowing maximal tumor removal without compromising language function. She was then re-sedated for surgical closure. Postoperatively, there were no new deficits, speech remained at baseline, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed gross total resection.
CONCLUSIONS
This case report highlights the importance of individualized anesthesia planning and the under-recognized role of intraoperative SLP integration in awake craniotomy, which offers a more responsive approach to functional preservation than standard practice alone. For select patients, the SAS method provides a balance between patient comfort, surgical access, and preservation of neurological function.
Keywords: Awareness; Craniotomy; Language Disorders; Neurosurgical Procedures; Speech Therapy; Supratentorial Neoplasms
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






