01 July 2026
: Case report
[In Press] Robot-Assisted Surgery Requiring an Intraoperative Transition to Laparoscopic Surgery Due to an Emergency System Shutdown: A Case Report
Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents
Yuichiro Kizaki1E, Kouki Samejima1A, Shigetaka MatsunagaDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952578
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952578
Available online: 2026-07-01, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Robot-assisted hysterectomy (RASH) for benign uterine disease has been covered by insurance in Japan since 2018. Our department introduced RASH in December 2020, and the number of procedures has increased without major complications. Herein, we report a case in which robot-assisted surgery required intraoperative conversion to conventional laparoscopy because of an unexpected robotic system shutdown.
CASE REPORT
A 54-year-old multiparous woman presented with hypermenorrhea and anemia caused by uterine adenomyosis. After unsuccessful conservative treatment, definitive surgical management was planned. Following 6 months of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog therapy, RASH was performed using the da Vinci X system. Four robotic ports and a single 5-mm assistant port were placed. Total operative time was 202 minutes, including 148 minutes of console time. After transvaginal uterine removal and vaginal cuff closure, the robotic system suddenly underwent an emergency shutdown during confirmation of hemostasis, making intracorporeal manipulation impossible. Although the manufacturer was contacted immediately and troubleshooting was attempted, the system could not be restored. Therefore, the operation was converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery using the same port placement, and the procedure was completed successfully. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged without complications.
CONCLUSIONS
Robot-assisted surgery is increasingly used in gynecology because of its minimally invasive advantages. However, surgeons should be prepared for unexpected events such as robotic system failure. Familiarity with laparoscopic surgical techniques enables safe continuation of surgery in such situations. This case highlights the importance of maintaining laparoscopic surgical skills to ensure the safe performance of robot-assisted procedures.
Keywords: Case Reports; Gynecology; Hysterectomy; Intraoperative Complications; Laparoscopy; Robotic Surgical Procedures
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949566
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952005
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952443
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953173
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
22,282,456
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
174,072
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
119,650
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
64,568
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






