12 May 2026
: Case report
[In Press] Management of a Severe Traumatic Intrusion of a Permanent Incisor With Spontaneous Re-Eruption After Maxillary Expansion: A Surgical-Orthodontic Case Report
Unusual clinical course, Challenging differential diagnosis, Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents
Claudia CapurroDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952814
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952814
Available online: 2026-05-12, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Traumatic intrusion of permanent incisors is one of the most severe forms of dental injury and is frequently associated with complications such as pulp necrosis, root resorption, and ankylosis. Although IADT guidelines provide structured recommendations based on the stage of root development and degree of intrusion, some clinical situations remain borderline, particularly cases presenting an open apex in an otherwise nearly mature root, making classification and treatment planning challenging.
CASE REPORT
A 7-year-old girl presented with severe intrusive luxation (>10 mm) of the permanent right maxillary central incisor. Clinical and radiographic assessment revealed a wide apical foramen but near-complete root length, placing the case in a borderline category. A multidisciplinary plan was initiated, consisting of surgical repositioning and flexible splinting, followed by orthodontic extrusion. After 2 months of traction, undesirable intrusion of the adjacent incisors occurred, while the affected tooth failed to extrude, raising suspicion of ankylosis and leading to suspension of active orthodontic forces. Due to concurrent maxillary constriction, rapid palatal expansion was performed. Unexpectedly, spontaneous re-eruption of the intruded incisor occurred shortly after completing expansion, without further orthodontic intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
This case illustrates borderline presentations can require adaptive and individualized treatment strategies beyond standard guideline recommendations. The spontaneous re-eruption observed after expansion suggests orthopedic interventions modify local conditions, potentially facilitating natural repositioning, even in teeth initially suspected of ankylosis. Nevertheless, the relationship between expansion and eruptive recovery should be interpreted as hypothetical rather than causative. Further clinical reports are needed to elucidate the biological mechanisms underlying this phenomenon and define its potential therapeutic relevance.
Keywords: Case Reports; Child; Incisor; Orthodontics, Corrective; Tooth Injuries; Tooth, Impacted
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






