24 June 2026
: Case report
[In Press] Diagnostic Challenge of Sequential Appendicitis in a Patient With Appendiceal Duplication: A Case Report
Congenital defects / diseases
Adonys Hidalgo LópezDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953106
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953106
Available online: 2026-06-24, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Appendiceal duplication is an exceptionally rare congenital anomaly, with a reported prevalence of less than 0.003%, and remains poorly represented in the contemporary evidence-based surgical literature. Recent Cochrane reviews and PubMed-indexed meta-analyses (2024 onward) have refined diagnostic pathways and management strategies for acute appendicitis; however, congenital anatomical variants such as appendiceal duplication are largely excluded from these analyses. Among the described subtypes, type B2 duplication according to the Cave–Wallbridge classification is clinically significant due to the presence of 2 completely independent appendices arising from opposite teniae coli. This configuration carries a substantial risk of delayed diagnosis, missed intraoperative recognition, and sequential appendicitis, particularly in patients with a history of prior appendectomy.
CASE REPORT
A 33-year-old man with a previous open appendectomy and histopathological confirmation of acute appendicitis presented 3 years later with recurrent right lower quadrant pain and signs of localized peritonitis. Cross-sectional imaging demonstrated free intraperitoneal fluid but failed to identify a definitive etiology. Exploratory laparotomy revealed a second, previously unrecognized retrocecal appendix located along the omental tenia, consistent with type B2 appendiceal duplication, complicated by acute inflammation and perforation. A retrograde appendectomy was performed. Comparative histopathological analysis confirmed acute appendicitis in both specimens, establishing the diagnosis of sequential appendicitis secondary to appendiceal duplication.
CONCLUSIONS
Appendiceal duplication, although exceedingly rare, is a clinically relevant cause of recurrent abdominal pathology after appendectomy. Careful intraoperative inspection of the cecum and its teniae is essential to avoid missed diagnoses. Increased awareness and reporting of this anomaly are necessary to integrate rare anatomical variants into evidence-based surgical practice.
Keywords: Anatomic Variation; Appendicitis; Appendix; Congenital Abnormalities
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952839
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952958
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953036
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953106
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
21,934,830
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
173,409
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
119,309
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
64,246
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






