11 June 2026
: Case report
[In Press] Systemic Reaction After Centipede Bite in a Child: Diagnostic Challenges Between Toxic and Hypersensitivity Mechanisms
Unusual clinical course, Challenging differential diagnosis, Management of emergency care
Takatoshi Murakami1E, Yusuke Miyashita1AE, Toshihiko Nonaka1B, Mika Ogata2D, Kimitoshi Nakamura2DDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953155
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953155
Available online: 2026-06-11, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Centipede (Scolopendra subspinipes) envenomation typically causes localized pain and swelling and is generally considered a self-limited condition. However, systemic reactions resembling hypersensitivity responses, such as generalized urticaria and respiratory discomfort, have occasionally been reported. Differentiation of toxic venom effects from immunologically mediated reactions remains challenging, particularly in pediatric patients, because standardized diagnostic testing for centipede venom allergy is unavailable.
CASE REPORT
A previously healthy 4-year-old girl developed generalized urticaria, facial swelling, pallor, and transient respiratory discomfort approximately 10 minutes after sustaining multiple nocturnal centipede bites indoors. Cutaneous manifestations appeared at sites distant from the bite locations, a finding potentially compatible with a systemic reaction rather than a purely localized toxic effect. Vital signs remained stable, and symptoms improved spontaneously without pharmacologic intervention. Hymenoptera-venom-specific IgE testing performed several weeks later showed weak positivity (class 1), although the patient had no prior history of bee or wasp stings. Considering the possibility of recurrent systemic reactions in environments where repeated exposure may occur, an epinephrine auto-injector was prescribed for emergency preparedness.
CONCLUSIONS
This case highlights diagnostic challenges in distinguishing toxic and allergic mechanisms after arthropod envenomation in children. The persistence of venom-specific IgE beyond the acute phase may suggest susceptibility to venom-related hypersensitivity, rather than a transient response to envenomation. Even when symptoms resolve spontaneously and definitive diagnostic confirmation is unavailable, careful clinical assessment and risk stratification remain essential. Preparedness for possible future anaphylaxis should be considered when systemic symptoms occur after arthropod exposure.
Keywords: Anaphylaxis; Case Reports; Child; Envenomation; Toxicology
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






