21 July 2026
: Case report
[In Press] Recurrent Intravenous Contrast-Induced Submandibular Sialadenitis: A Case Report and Literature Review
Unknown etiology, Challenging differential diagnosis, Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents, Unusual setting of medical care, Unexpected drug reaction, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Narisara Chobaroon1ABCDEF, Thitiporn Suwatanapongched1ACDEFDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953439
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953439
Available online: 2026-07-21, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Iodinated contrast-induced sialadenitis (iodide mumps) is a rare and underrecognized delayed non-allergic adverse reaction to iodinated contrast media. It is characterized by painless or painful swelling of 1 or more salivary glands, typically occurring several hours after contrast exposure.
CASE REPORT
A 75-year-old Thai woman with stage 3a chronic kidney disease was referred for contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) imaging to evaluate longstanding bronchiectasis. Because she reported a prior episode of bilateral neck and submandibular swelling shortly after intravenous contrast administration 10 years earlier, premedication with oral prednisolone was prescribed. However, with a delayed onset (16 hours) after intravenous administration of iopromide (370 mg I/mL), she developed painful bilateral submandibular swelling and returned to the hospital. Physical examination revealed firm, mildly tender bilateral submandibular swelling without overlying erythema or purulent discharge from the openings of Wharton’s ducts. No laryngeal edema or bronchospasm was observed. Ultrasonography demonstrated diffuse enlargement of both submandibular glands, with heterogeneous echotexture, increased vascularity, and mild intraglandular ductal dilatation, without evidence of sialolithiasis or abscess. Based on the characteristic sonographic findings and the temporal relationship with contrast administration, a diagnosis of recurrent iodinated contrast-induced bilateral submandibular sialadenitis after re-exposure was made. Conservative management with warm compresses and oral analgesics resulted in complete symptom resolution within 4 days.
CONCLUSIONS
Iodinated contrast-induced sialadenitis is a rare, self-limited delayed reaction to iodinated contrast media that can recur after re-exposure. Recognition of its characteristic clinical and imaging findings is important to aid diagnosis and avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary contrast exposure, premedication, investigations, and treatment.
Keywords: Contrast Media; Iodides; Mumps; Recurrence; Sialadenitis
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952791
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952909
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950868
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
22,759,007
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
175,837
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
120,449
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
65,460
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






