12 October 2026
: Case report
[In Press] Subacute Ventricular Septal Rupture Following Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Coronary Syndrome
Unusual clinical course, Challenging differential diagnosis, Diagnostic / therapeutic accidents, Management of emergency care
Oguz Kilic1BEF, Mehmet MuştuDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.954370
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.954370
Available online: 2026-10-12, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a well-documented mechanical complication of acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, its occurrence following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic coronary syndrome is extremely rare, with only isolated cases reported in the literature. This report describes the case of an unexpected subacute VSR after an otherwise uneventful elective revascularization.
CASE REPORT
A 71-year-old woman with chronic coronary syndrome, diabetes, and hypertension underwent successful elective PCI to the left anterior descending artery. Despite an uncomplicated immediate procedural result, she experienced chest pain and ventricular fibrillation 6 hours post-procedure, requiring brief cardiopulmonary resuscitation and immediate defibrillation. Urgent control angiography demonstrated complete stent patency without dissection, thrombosis, or embolization. However, at 34 hours post-PCI, the patient developed sudden-onset dyspnea and rapid hemodynamic collapse. Physical examination revealed a new, harsh pansystolic murmur at the mesocardiac border. Emergency bedside transthoracic echocardiography confirmed an apical VSR with a significant left-to-right shunt. Due to ongoing severe hemodynamic collapse and an extremely high surgical risk, percutaneous transcatheter closure was attempted as a bail-out procedure; however, the patient died during the intervention in the catheterization laboratory. No postmortem tissue exam or direct procedural anatomical inspection of the VSR site was feasible.
CONCLUSIONS
This case indicates that life-threatening mechanical complications like VSR can potentially occur outside the traditional paradigm of ACS, extending into the setting of elective revascularization for severe, chronic lesions. Rather than establishing a broad clinical standard, this report highlights the critical importance of post-procedural vigilance and a low threshold for prompt bedside echocardiographic evaluation whenever unexpected hemodynamic instability or a new murmur arises following PCI.
Keywords: Coronary Angiography; Rupture; Ventricular Septal Rupture
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952551
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953701
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953543
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.954216
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
28,712,648
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
180,670
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
124,385
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
08 May 2026 : Case report
95,363
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.952158
Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e952158






