21 October 2026
: Case report
[In Press] Impaled Knife in the Cardiac Box: Staged Surgical Management in a Hemodynamically Stable Patient
Unusual clinical course, Challenging differential diagnosis, Management of emergency care
Pei-Jin Li1E, Pin-Li ChouDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.954672
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.954672
Available online: 2026-10-21, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Penetrating cardiac box injuries risk cardiac, great-vessel, and pulmonary damage and usually present with hemodynamic instability. A knife impaled there in a stable, ambulatory patient is rare and raises decisions about imaging, surgical approach, and safe removal. This report describes such a patient, in whom blade trajectory and the positioning constraints of the impaled object dictated the operative sequence.
CASE REPORT
A 29-year-old woman presented after self-inflicted injury. She was ambulatory and hemodynamically stable, with a knife impaled in the left hemithorax within the cardiac box. High-sensitivity troponin I was markedly elevated. Point-of-care ultrasound showed a left “barcode sign” (pneumothorax) without pericardial effusion; a chest tube was placed. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) localized the blade tip millimeters from the left hilum, abutting the left atrial appendage and pulmonary artery, without contrast extravasation. Because the tip abutted the hilum and the knife precluded lateral decubitus positioning, median sternotomy exposed the heart and proximal great vessels before the 9-cm blade was withdrawn under direct vision; no bleeding occurred. The pericardium was unpenetrated. Two small epicardial lesions consistent with contusion were found at the apex. Thoracoscopy after extraction confirmed no lung, hilar, or diaphragmatic injury. She was discharged on postoperative day 10.
CONCLUSIONS
In selected stable patients, contrast-enhanced CT trajectory assessment can inform a staged surgical approach sequenced by physiology, trajectory, positioning constraints, and the exposure needed for vascular control. An impaled blade should be removed only in the operating room, under direct vision, and after the structures along its track are exposed.
Keywords: Sternotomy; Thoracic Injuries; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted; Wounds, Stab; Heart Injuries
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953701
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953543
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.954216
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.954932
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
28,712,695
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
180,721
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
124,419
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
08 May 2026 : Case report
95,462
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.952158
Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e952158






