Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

21 May 2021: Articles  USA

Transplantation of 2-Month-Old En Bloc Pediatric Kidneys After a Complex Vascular Reconstruction – Traveling 2500 Miles to Get Transplanted: A Case Report

Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Rare disease

Paolo Vincenzi1ABCDEF, Angel Alvarez1BE, Javier Gonzalez2E, Giselle Guerra3AE, Gaetano Ciancio14ABDEF*

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.931124

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e931124



BACKGROUND: En bloc pediatric kidneys (EBPK) are one potential solution to increase the number of organs available in the donor community, thus promoting transplantation of these allografts into adult recipients. However, EBPK transplantation has been traditionally considered suboptimal due to concerns for perioperative complications, mainly vascular thrombosis. We report an en bloc kidney transplantation using vascular grafts from another deceased donor to extend the EBPK aorta and vena cava and create a tension-free anastomosis with recipient external iliac vessels.

CASE REPORT: A pair of 2-month-old female en bloc kidneys weighting 6 kg were transplanted to a 30-year-old adult male. Prolonged cold ischemic time (CIT) was related to high refusal rate and long travel from Nevada to Miami. Prior to transplantation, the EBPK were connected to the LifePort Renal Preservation Machine® and deemed transplantable only after showing a significant improvement in perfusion parameters. Back-table reconstruction was conducted through an end-to-end anastomosis between an adult deceased donor common iliac artery and vein grafts to the inferior vena cava and aortic distal ends, respectively. The patient displayed immediate graft function (IGF) without any postoperative complications, showing a creatinine of 1.5 mg/dl at 4-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: Use of renal preservation machine (RPM) and refined back-table reconstruction of these allografts are important tools to improve the significant discard rate and improve outcomes of EBPK.

Keywords: Kidney Transplantation, Pediatrics, Reconstructive Surgical Procedures, Vascular Grafting, Adult, Anastomosis, Surgical, Child, Graft Survival, Infant, Kidney, Postoperative Complications, Tissue Donors


Renal transplantation remains the best treatment option for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, only a small proportion of these patients finally receive a kidney transplant due to an important mismatch between potential candidates and donor organ availability [1].

En bloc pediatric kidneys (EBPK) transplantation is one potential solution to expand the donor kidney allograft pool [2]. Traditionally, there has been reluctance among surgeons in transplanting small pediatric organs (ie, donor age less than 3 years, weight less than 10 kg, and kidney measures less than 6 cm) due to an increased risk of postoperative vascular and urologic complications leading to delayed graft function (DGF), primary non-function (PNF), and graft loss, making their use challenging in both pediatric and adult recipients [3].

However, EBPK have been shown to provide long-term renal outcomes similar to adult single kidneys, although there remains a paucity of data regarding the smallest donors weighing <10 kg [3–5].

Furthermore, these allografts have been frequently reported to be damaged during the procurement procedure, adding even more concerns about their utilization [6]. Nevertheless, a meticulous technique of reconstruction at the back table has been previously highlighted as the key to overcome these issues [6].

We report an EBPK transplantation from an infant donor to an adult recipient after complex back-table reconstruction with arterial and venous allografts from another blood-compatible adult deceased donor. Despite the prolonged cold ischemia time secondary to the long travel from Nevada to Miami, the EBKP showed immediate graft function (IGF).

Case Report

The donor was a 2-month-old female infant who weighted 6 kg and was declared brain dead due to hypoxic brain injury (terminal creatinine level and urine output were 0.15 mg/dL and 8 cc/h, respectively).

During the en bloc kidneys retrieval, the aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC) were divided cranially at the level of the take-offs of both renal arteries and veins. The aortic and caval distal ends were divided at 4 and 3.5 cm in caudal direction, respectively. Both kidneys measured 5×2.5×1.5 cm, making the vascular ends and lower poles of the allograft located practically at the same distance from the renal hilum (Figure 1).

Since a direct closure of both proximal vascular ends would compromise adequate graft hemodynamics, same-donor cap-shaped patches were used to close each of the proximal ends with 7-0 Prolene® running sutures [7]. At this point, the allograft was connected to the LifePort® renal preservation machine and stored in hypothermia (2–4ºC) using kidney perfusion solution (KPS-1®) (Figure 1).

The recipient was a 30-year-old male, weight 68 kg, who had been on hemodialysis for 16 months due to hypertensive nephropathy.

The transplant was performed using the standard extra-perito-neal approach with the right iliac fossa as the site for implantation of the en bloc kidneys. After dissecting free the recipient external iliac vessels, the EBPK allograft were removed from the pulsatile perfusion machine and kept on ice. There were notable discrepancies between the aortic and IVC lengths, size of the kidneys, and depth of the location for both external iliac vessels, thus preventing a proper tension-free anastomotic outcome. Therefore, we opted to use common iliac arterial and venous graft conduits from another blood-compatible deceased donor to increase the length of the distal vascular ends. The common iliac artery and vein were anastomosed end-to-end with running 6-0 Prolene® sutures to the IVC and aortic distal ends, respectively (Figures 2, 3). The vascular extensions allowed the end-to-side anastomoses to the recipient right external iliac vessels in a tension-free manner using running 6-0 Prolene® sutures (Figures 3, 4).

Ureteroplasty was accomplished by side-to-side anastomosis of both distal ureters with 6-0 PDS running suture, and stent-free extravesical ureteroneocystostomy was performed onto the recipient bladder dome using 6-0 PDS running suture, in line with the Miami Transplant Institute (MTI) technique [8] (Figure 3).

The cold and warm ischemia times were 1973 and 24 minutes, respectively. No surgical drainage was used.

The recipient received immunosuppressive therapy according to protocols adopted at our institute, with induction consisting of intravenous antithymocyte globulin (1 mg/kg×3 doses), methylprednisolone (500 mg×3 doses) and basiliximab (20 mg×2 doses) [9]. The first dose of each immunosuppressant drug was administered intraoperatively before reperfusion of the renal allograft. Maintenance immunosuppression included a steroid-free regimen consisting of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, starting on postoperative day 1.

Postoperative Doppler ultrasound showed no collections in the perinephric space or signs of obstructive uropathy. Laminar blood flow and normal parameters (ie, resistive index, peak systolic velocity and ratio, and Z-velocity) in both the external iliac and graft arteries were also recorded.

The patient had an uneventful recovery, showing a Cr level of 1.5 mg/dl at 4 months.


The disparity between potential recipients on the waiting list and availability of organs continues to grow. Aiming to resolve this issue, Meakins et al were the first authors to describe successful transplantation of en bloc pediatric kidneys into adult recipients. Nevertheless, most transplant centers refrain from using renal allografts of pediatric donors younger than 2 years old due to concerns such as risk of dysplasia, development of hyper-filtration injury, insufficient nephron mass [11–13], and increased occurrence of vascular [14,15] and urologic complications [12].

In particular, vascular thrombosis is the most common surgical complication in this group of EBPK and is the leading cause of graft loss, with a reported incidence of 10–25% [16,17], which is much higher than the rate among adult donors (3.3%) [18]. Indeed, older age is generally considered to be negatively correlated with the incidence of vascular complications [19].

All these points suggest a high discard rate of pediatric kidneys [12,13], meaning that the use of pediatric transplants has not been optimized.

Nevertheless, follow-up of pediatric transplant patients, both single and en bloc, showed similar outcomes and renal function as adult donors [20,21], with a reported 1- and 5-year death censored graft survival of 91% for donation after brain death (DBD) grafts and of 89% and 87%, respectively, for donation after cardiac death (DCD) grafts [3].

In addition, pediatric grafts provide adequate renal function almost immediately after transplant, despite their small size, and appear to grow and mature rapidly to resemble adult kidneys within the first years after transplant [22].

The length of the donor aorta and vena cava may not always match the depth of recipient external iliac vessels, causing excessive traction and reduced mobility with limited placement of the graft and increased risk of vascular thrombosis [11]. This discrepancy is more important when using en bloc kidneys from infant donors. Therefore, aiming to avoid vascular complications secondary to excessive traction at the anastomotic sites, in our patient, cap-shaped same-donor grafts were placed in both proximal ends of the allograft aorta and IVC [23], and 2 conduits were placed at the distal allograft vascular ends, thus permitting their elongation. The reconstruction using vascular elongation patches and conduits has proved to be a useful and safe method for decreasing the incidence of vascular-related complications in transplantation [7,24].

Although there are few reports of back-table EBPK reconstruction and transplantation with good graft function previously published [7,25–27], all these reports agree on the crucial role of using a meticulous technique during the vascular reconstruction [7,25–27], which, in the light of the results obtained in this case, we also recognize as essential.

This EBPK procured in Las Vegas (NV) already had a prolonged cold ischemia time of 25 hours by the time it arrived at our institute in Miami, (FL) confirming the significant non-acceptance rate for pediatric kidneys, particularly for grafts from newborn and infant donors [12,13].

When the kidneys arrived at our institute, they were connected to the LifePort® renal preservation machine (RPM) and stored in hypothermia (2–4ºC) using kidney perfusion solution (KPS-1®). The perfusion pressure was set at 30–40/14–31 mmHg. Once placed on the RPM, the flow and resistance improved from 17 ml/min and 0.71 mmHg/ml/min to 53 ml/min and 0.31 mmHg/ml/min, respectively.

The RPM is a feasible option to determine organ viability and to evaluate marginal EBPK before transplantation. En bloc kidneys with renal flow lower than 50 ml/min and renal resistance higher than 0.5 mm Hg/ml/min should be used cautiously because of higher risk of graft loss [28].


The concerns regarding technical difficulty and expertise requirements in EBPK transplantation are justified in the light of previous experiences. Though these allografts do not represent a large part of the donor pool, we should make sure to utilize organs from every suitable donor.

Although the EBPK transplantation reported here required a complex vascular reconstruction and presented a prolonged cold ischemia time secondary to the long travel from Las Vegas to Miami, it showed immediate graft function and no postoperative complications were reported, reinforcing the concept that a delicate and refined back-table technique using deceased donor vascular grafts and the availability of machine perfusion could be crucial to avoid mishaps in the postoperative period and improve outcomes of these allografts.


1.. Rana A, Gruessner A, Agopian VG, Survival benefit of solid-organ transplant in the United States: JAMA Surg, 2015; 150(3); 252-59

2.. Damji S, Callahan CJ, Loukopoulos I, Utilization of small pediatric donor kidneys for transplantation: Ped Nephrol, 2019; 34; 1717-26

3.. Troppman C, Santhanakrishnan C, Fananapazir G, Pediatric en bloc kidney transplantation from very small (≤10Kg) donation after circulatory death (versus brain death) donors: Single-center matched-pair analysis of 130 transplants: Am J Transplant, 2018; 18(11); 2811-17

4.. Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Prats D, Perez-Contin M, Increasing the donor pool using en bloc pediatric kidneys for transplant: Transplantation, 2003; 76(8); 1180-84

5.. Sharma A, Fisher R, Cotterell A, En bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors: Comparable outcomes with living donor kidney transplantation: Transplantation, 2011; 92(5); 564-69

6.. Rofaiel G, Allam SR, Ali M, Successful transplantation of pediatric kidneys despite vascular injuries: Cureus, 2018; 10(7); e3073

7.. Garcia LE, Gonzalez J, Serena G, Donor vascular patch for reconstruction of the aorta and inferior vena cava in pediatric en bloc kidney transplantation: Actas Urol Esp, 2019; 43(9); 515-16

8.. Ciancio G, Farag A, Gonzalez J, Results of a previously unreported extravesical ureteroneocystostomy technique without ureteral stenting in 500 consecutive kidney transplant recipients: PLoS One, 2021; 16(1); e0244248

9.. Sageshima J, Ciancio G, Gaynor JJ, Addition of anti-CD25to thymoglobulin for induction therapy: Delayed return of peripheral bloodCD25-positive population: Clin Transplant, 2011; 25(2); E132-35

10.. Meakins JL, Smith EJ, Alexander JW, En bloc transplantation of both kidneys from pediatric donors into adult patients: Surgery, 1972; 71(1); 72-75

11.. Al-Shraideh Y, Farooq U, El-Hennawy H, Single vs dual (en bloc) kidney transplants from donors ≤5 years of age: A single center experience: World J Transplant, 2016; 6(1); 239-48

12.. Pelletier SJ, Guidinger MK, Merion RM, Recovery and utilization of deceased donor kidneys from small pediatric donors: Am J transplant, 2006; 6(7); 1646-52

13.. Maluf DG, Carrico RJ, Rosendale JD, Optimizing recovery, utilization and transplantation outcomes for kidneys from small, ≤20 kg, pediatric donors: Am J Transplant, 2013; 13(10); 2703-12

14.. Marques M, Prats D, Sanchez-Fuctuoso A, Incidence of renal artery stenosis in pediatric en bloc and adult single kidney transplants: Transplantation, 2001; 71(1); 164-66

15.. Dharnidharka VR, Stevens G, Howard RJ, En-bloc kidney transplantation in the United States: An analysis of United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) data from 1987 to 2003: Am J Transplant, 2005; 5(6); 1513-17

16.. Zhao WY, Zhang L, Zhu Y, En bloc kidneys transplanted from infant donors less than 5 kg into pediatric recipients: Transplantation, 2014; 97(5); 555-58

17.. Bresnahan BA, McBride MA, Cherikh WS, Risk factors for renal allograft survival from pediatric cadaver donors: An analysis of united network for organ sharing data: Transplantation, 2001; 72(2); 256-61

18.. de Freitas RAP, de Lima ML, Mazzali M, Early vascular thrombosis after kidney transplantation: can we predict patients at risk?: Transplant Proc, 2017; 49(4); 817-20

19.. Jin X, Hu JM, Liu YG, Multicenter clinical study of single-kidney transplantation vs en bloc transplantation with kidneys from deceased pediatric donors: Transplant Proc, 2019; 51(10); 3252-58

20.. Thomusch O, Tittlebach-Helmrich D, Meyer S, Twenty-year graft survival and graft function analysis by a matched pair study between pediatric en bloc kidney and deceased adult donors grafts: Transplantation, 2009; 88(7); 920-25

21.. Hafner-Giessauf H, Mauric A, Muller H, Long-term outcome of en bloc pediatric kidney transplantation in adult recipients – up to 22 years of center experience: Ann Transplant, 2013; 18; 101-7

22.. Ngheim D, Hsia S, Schlosser J, Growth and function of en bloc infant kidney transplants: A preliminary study: J Urol, 1995; 153(2); 326-29

23.. Ciancio G, Kato T, Chen L, Transplantation of en-bloc pediatric kidneys with a partial bladder segment in an adult recipient: Transplant Int, 2009; 22(3); 350-53

24.. Tan LC, Rahman AU, Walters AM, The inferior vena caval conduit – a neglected technique in transplantation of the right cadaveric kidney?: Transpl Int, 2000; 13(Suppl. 1); S60-63

25.. Raza SS, Ravula PK, Hakeem AR, En bloc kidney transplantation from young pediatric donors: A scope to increase the donor pool: Exp Clin Transplant, 2014; 12(3); 261-64

26.. Dai H, Peng L, Peng F, A novel technique for en bloc kidney transplantation from infant donors with extremely low body weight by using the distal abdominal aorta as an outflow tract: Am J Transplant, 2018; 18(9); 2200-7

27.. Nguefouet Momo RE, Donato P, Ugolini G, Kidney transplantation from living donor with monolateral renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia using a cryopreserved iliac graft for arterial reconstruction: A case report and review of the literature: BMC Nephrol, 2020; 21(1); 451

28.. Sageshima J, Ciancio G, Chen L, Pulsatile perfusion preservation of en bloc kidneys from small pediatric donors: Transplantation, 2009; 87(5); 782


04 July 2022 : Case report  Italy

Interleukin-6 Is a Promising Marker of COVID-19 in Children: A Case Series of 2 Brothers with Severe COVID-...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.934468  

29 June 2022 : Case report  USA

A Clinical Case of COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936896  

16 June 2022 : Case report  Ecuador

Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Patient with SARS-Cov-2 Pneumonia in an Intensive Care Unit ...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936498  

13 June 2022 : Case report  Japan

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infection Associated with COVID-19: A Case Series and Literature Review

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936889  

In Press

05 Jul 2022 : Case report  Saudi Arabia

Osteolytic Lesion of the Maxilla in an Undiagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patient Identified Incidentally by Cone...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936585  

05 Jul 2022 : Case report  USA

Histiocytic Disorder Mimicking a Brain Tumor: A Report of 2 Rare Cases

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.935885  

05 Jul 2022 : Case report  Greece

Solitary Soft-Tissue Metastasis of a Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma 2 Years After Curative Resection: Report of ...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.934951  

05 Jul 2022 : Case report  Switzerland

Degenerated Serous Cystic Tumor of the Pancreas: Case Report and Literature Review of an Aggressive Present...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.936165  

Most Viewed Current Articles

23 Feb 2022 : Case report  USA

Penile Necrosis Associated with Local Intravenous Injection of Cocaine

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935250

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250

17 Feb 2022 : Case report  Oman

Myocarditis, Pulmonary Hemorrhage, and Extensive Myositis with Rhabdomyolysis 12 Days After First Dose of P...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934399

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934399

06 Dec 2021 : Case report  Brazil

Lipedema Can Be Treated Non-Surgically: A Report of 5 Cases

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406

09 Feb 2022 : Case report  Saudi Arabia

Extensive Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) After the First Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA COV...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934744

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e934744

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923