Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

31 August 2021: Articles  Japan

Vulvar Paget’s Disease Presenting with Fever and Left Inguinal and Peritoneal Lymphadenopathies

Mistake in diagnosis

Risa Hirata1ABEF, Masaki Tago1AEF*, Yoshio Hisata1AEF, Shu-ichi Yamashita1AEF

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.931600

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e931600

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic vulvar Paget’s disease is rare and commonly presents with vulvar eczema, erosions, or pruritus. The time from onset to diagnosis of vulvar Paget’s disease tends to be rather long because of difficulty making a correct diagnosis owing to similar skin findings with eczema or patients’ reluctance to undergo physical examination of their pubic area because of embarrassment.

CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old woman experienced recurrent episodes of fever for 10 months. Her primary care physician indicated inguinal lymphadenopathy 2 months prior to presentation at our hospital. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography revealed multiple intra-abdominal lymphadenopathies. With the failure of finding the primary lesion after biopsy, and with a diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma, she was referred to our hospital. On admission, she did not report having vulvar symptoms. As imaging studies revealed no primary lesions, we subsequently added immunostaining to the lymph node biopsy specimens, which suggested Paget’s disease. We finally performed a vulvar physical examination and identified eczema. We performed a skin biopsy and histopathological examinations, which provided the final diagnosis of vulvar Paget’s disease.

CONCLUSIONS: We experienced a case of vulvar Paget’s disease presenting with inguinal and intraperitoneal lymphadenopathies, without a patient report of vulvar symptoms. When identifying lymphadenopathies, it is crucial to obtain a careful history and perform appropriate physical examinations, suspecting diseases of the vulva or perineum. In addition, immunostaining of lymph node biopsy specimens could be useful in making a correct diagnosis.

Keywords: delayed diagnosis, lymphadenopathy, Paget’s Disease, Extramammary, Female, Humans, Paget Disease, Extramammary, Vulvar Neoplasms

Background

Vulvar Paget’s disease, a type of extramammary Paget’s disease, is a rare type of malignancy [1], especially in Japan, which originates from skin appendages such as apocrine glands [1]. Many cases of extramammary Paget’s disease were reported to have vulvar abnormalities, 87% to 98% of which were common skin lesions, such as eczema or erosions, followed by 78% to 98% which were pruritus [2,3]. Vulvar Paget’s disease is well known for the notoriously long time needed to achieve a correct diagnosis [2,3]. The time from onset to diagnosis of vulvar Paget’s disease is approximately 20 months [2–4] because it is extremely difficult to distinguish the skin lesions of Paget’s disease from benign conditions, such as contact dermatitis, fungal infections, or Bowen’s disease, using only gross physical findings without biopsy [1,5]. Therefore, biopsy is essential with recalcitrant vulvar skin lesions, despite usual treatments [6]. Furthermore, vulvar Paget’s disease could present only as inguinal lymphadenopathies as a chief complaint without vulvar symptoms [5], and patients’ embarrassment regarding examination of their pubic area could actually prevent physical examination [7,8].

We report a case of a patient with vulvar Paget’s disease showing fever and lymphadenopathies, without a report of vulvar skin symptoms, whose correct diagnosis was suspected only after histopathological examination of the left inguinal and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathies.

Case Report

A 55-year-old woman experienced recurrent episodes of fever >38.5°C, generalized arthralgia, and myalgia lasting a few days, with spontaneous improvement without respiratory, urinary, or gastrointestinal symptoms, once a month since onset. She visited her primary care physician, who indicated inguinal lymphadenopathy in the eighth month after onset. Her fever frequency increased to twice a month by the tenth month, without night sweats or weight loss. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed left inguinal and multiple intra-abdominal lymphadenopathies. Histopathological findings for the inguinal lymph node biopsy specimens suggested metastatic carcinoma, but a primary lesion was not identified. She was referred to our hospital in the tenth month.

On her first visit to our hospital, the patient’s height was 161.8 cm, body weight was 49.2 kg, body mass index was 18.9 kg/m2, body temperature was 36.5°C, blood pressure was 113/70 mm Hg, pulse rate was 62 beats/min, percutaneous oxygen saturation was 96% on room air, and respiratory rate was 12 breaths/min. Physical examination revealed movable and painless left inguinal lymphadenopathies. The cervical, supraclavicular, and axillary lymph nodes were impalpable, and there were no other abnormalities in her trunk and extremities. The laboratory findings on admission are shown in Table 1. The white blood cell count was 6 300/µL; neutrophils, 58.8%; lymphocytes, 33.2%; hemoglobin, 12.8 g/dL; and platelets, 265 000/µL, with no abnormal cells in the peripheral blood. Other results were as follows: total protein, 7.3 g/dL; albumin, 3.9 g/dL; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), 187 U/L; C-reactive protein, 0.05 mg/dL; ferritin, 164 ng/mL; and sIL-2R, 339 U/mL. Renal and liver functions were normal with normal immunoglobulin concentrations. No antibodies to Mycobacterium tuberculosis IFN-γ, anti-human T-cell leukemia virus antibody, syphilis serology, and HIV were identified. Angiotensin-converting enzyme concentrations were also normal at 15.1 IU/L. The urinalysis showed only unremarkable findings. The findings in imaging studies, such as electrocardiography and chest X-rays, were normal, and upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed no malignancy in the gastrointestinal tract. Chest and abdominal CT with contrast enhancement revealed multiple lymphadenopathies in the left inguinal, left external iliac, bilateral internal iliac, bilateral common iliac, and para-abdominal aortic regions (Figure 1), without showing a possible primary lesion. Even positron emission tomography(PET)-CT revealed no abnormal uptake in areas other than the lymphadenopathies (Figure 2). Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the lymph node biopsy specimens performed at the previous hospital (Figure 3A) showed infiltration and proliferation of malignant cells, with eosinophilic cytoplasm and round-shaped nuclei, which was diagnosed as lymph node metastasis of some kind of carcinoma. Additional immunostaining performed at our hospital showed positive results for cytokeratin (CK) AE1/AE3, CK7, anti-GATA3 antibodies, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), with negative findings for thyroid-specific transcription factor, paired box gene 8, and CK20, suggesting a malignancy of the urinary tract, gynecological organs, or breast as a primary lesion. More importantly, the result of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) was partially positive (Figure 3B), suggesting a possible relationship with apocrine tumors, including breast cancer or Paget’s disease. However, physical and ultrasonographic examinations of the patient’s breasts recon-firmed the absence of any abnormalities.

When we obtained another history from the patient, focusing on her vulvar symptoms and signs and suspecting vulvar Paget’s disease, she finally and reluctantly disclosed the long history of having pruritus and discharge related to eczematous lesions on her vulvar and perineal areas, which had been treated by her dermatologist with topical dermatological medications without improvement for 26 months before the first visit to our hospital. We subsequently examined her vulvar and perineal areas, which revealed erythematous lesions with erosions spreading from the area just above the clitoris, bilateral labia minora and labia majora, and left perineal area to the anus (Figure 4). The pelvic examination and vaginal speculum examination showed no abnormalities, and the cervical cytology was negative. As these skin findings strongly suggested vulvar Paget’s disease, we performed skin biopsy of a vulvar lesion and histopathological examinations, which provided a final diagnosis of vulvar Paget’s disease (Figure 5). Finally, other imaging tests showed no abnormalities in the uterus or ovaries. She was treated with anti-cancer chemotherapy, including docetaxel, after undergoing surgical resection of vulvar and perineal tumors. She has been receiving anti-cancer chemotherapy, including docetaxel, for more than 16 months.

Discussion

Patients with vulvar Paget’s disease presenting with fever and lymphadenopathies as chief symptoms are extremely rare, with only one report showing inguinal lymphadenopathy as a chief symptom [5]. In the present case, we initially tried making a diagnosis by finding the cause of fever and lymphadenopathy. Culprit lesions of inguinal lymphadenopathy are often found with other pathological conditions of the lower extremities, vulvae, anus, or genitalia [9], including malignant lymphoma, gastrointestinal, urinary tract, or gynecological malignancies, tuberculosis [10], sarcoidosis [11], or cat scratch disease [12]. We used PET-CT to find the primary lesion, suspecting malignant lymphoma or gastrointestinal malignancies as prime candidates, which failed to identify lesions in the pelvic cavity.

The key to making the diagnosis of vulvar Paget’s disease is to obtain a meticulous history and to perform appropriate physical examination of skin lesions, which we failed to perform until the histopathological examination findings suggested the diagnosis. Although our patient had actually experienced vulvar symptoms for a long time, we were unable to realize that because of our failure to obtain an appropriate history on her first visit to our department. In Japan, physical examinations of the pubic area, especially of women, are rarely performed without reports of symptoms by the patient. Practically, a patient’s embarrassment [7,8] or misunderstanding of the lesion could force a patient to leave lesions in the pubic area untreated, which could prevent an appropriate diagnostic process. From an anatomical point of view, because lymphatic vessels distributed in the dermal tissue of the vulva run horizontally to superficial inguinal lymph nodes, whereas lymphatic vessels distributed in the clitoris and anterior labia minora flow directly into the inguinal or internal iliac lymph nodes [13], physical examination of the vulvar area is mandatory when inguinal lymphadenopathies are seen, especially without detecting a primary lesion in the pelvis or lower extremities. Thus, repetitive history taking or physical examinations in accordance with a system review [14] and anatomical knowledge [13] are valuable to prevent inadequate medical practice. In addition, a respectful attitude by the physician to make a patient feel less embarrassed is required when proposing and explaining procedures to the patient as well as when performing the procedures, when examinations of embarrassing areas are mandatory. Needless to say, it is also essential to create good physician–patient relationships in daily medical practice [15].

In the present case, we added immunostaining to the inguinal lymph node biopsy specimens obtained at the previous hospital, which helped us make a correct diagnosis. More specifically, positive CK7 and negative CK20 led us to suspect carcinoma of the lung, breast, thyroid, endometrium, bile duct, or pancreas [16,17], resulting in adequate denial of those as a primary lesion by subsequent appropriate examinations. Moreover, positive results for CK7, CEA, and GCDFP-15, which were reported to be 100%, 84.2%, and 52.6% positive, respectively, by special immunostaining in a study of primary extramammary Paget’s disease, led us to suspect extramammary Paget’s disease as the primary lesion [18]. Therefore, it is essential to add immunostaining of the lymph node biopsy specimens, especially when a primary lesion for lymph node metastasis is not readily found with standard screening examinations.

Conclusions

Patients with vulvar Paget’s disease can present with inguinal or intraperitoneal lymphadenopathies without reports of vulvar symptoms. For such patients, it is crucial to obtain a meticulous history and perform appropriate physical examinations, suspecting the presence of vulvar or perineal diseases. In addition, immunostaining of lymph node biopsy specimens could help make a correct diagnosis.

Figures

Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography obtained at the first visit to our hospital in the tenth month of illness. (A) The lymph nodes in the left inguinal (arrowhead) and left external iliac regions (arrow) are enlarged. (B) Multiple lymph nodes are enhanced in the para-abdominal aortic region (white arrowheads).Figure 1.. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography obtained at the first visit to our hospital in the tenth month of illness. (A) The lymph nodes in the left inguinal (arrowhead) and left external iliac regions (arrow) are enlarged. (B) Multiple lymph nodes are enhanced in the para-abdominal aortic region (white arrowheads). Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (CT) obtained 2 weeks after the first visit to our hospital. The image shows high uptake in the lymphadenopathies already detected by CT, with no other lesions showing high uptake.Figure 2.. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (CT) obtained 2 weeks after the first visit to our hospital. The image shows high uptake in the lymphadenopathies already detected by CT, with no other lesions showing high uptake. Pathological findings of the lymph node biopsy specimens of the left inguinal lymph node. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (×200) showing infiltration and proliferation of malignant cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and round-shaped nuclei. (B) Gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP)-15 staining (×100) showing that some of the malignant cells identified by H&E staining are positive with GCDFP-15 staining.Figure 3.. Pathological findings of the lymph node biopsy specimens of the left inguinal lymph node. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (×200) showing infiltration and proliferation of malignant cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and round-shaped nuclei. (B) Gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP)-15 staining (×100) showing that some of the malignant cells identified by H&E staining are positive with GCDFP-15 staining. Gross findings of the vulvar skin lesions. Erythematous lesions with erosions spread from the area just above the clitoris, bilateral labia minora and labia majora, and left perineal area to the anus.Figure 4.. Gross findings of the vulvar skin lesions. Erythematous lesions with erosions spread from the area just above the clitoris, bilateral labia minora and labia majora, and left perineal area to the anus. Pathological findings of the biopsy specimens of vulvar skin lesions. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (×400) showing Paget cells with bright cell bodies within the epidermis. (B) Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) staining (×200) showing that some of the malignant cells identified by H&E staining are positive with GCDFP-15 staining.Figure 5.. Pathological findings of the biopsy specimens of vulvar skin lesions. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (×400) showing Paget cells with bright cell bodies within the epidermis. (B) Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) staining (×200) showing that some of the malignant cells identified by H&E staining are positive with GCDFP-15 staining.

References:

1.. Loiacono RMR, Traversi P, Deliso MA, Paget disease of the vulva an analysis of 24 cases: Medicine (Baltimore), 2019; 98; 41

2.. Tebes S, Cardosi R, Hoffman M, Paget’s disease of the vulva: Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002; 187; 281-84

3.. Shaco-Levy R, Bean SM, Vollmer RT, Paget disease of the vulva: A study of 56 cases: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X, 2010; 149; 86-91

4.. Jones IS, Crandon A, Sanday K, Paget’s disease of the vulva: Diagnosis and follow-up key to management; A retrospective study of 50 cases from Queensland: Gynecol Oncol, 2011; 122; 42-44

5.. Chan JYW, Li GKH, Chung JHP, Chow VLY, Extramammary Paget’s disease: 20 years of experience in Chinese population: Int J Surg Oncol, 2012; 2012; 416418

6.. Hillmann BR, Pereira AA, Sommacal LF, Extramammary Paget disease of the vulva-case report: Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2016; 38; 524-28

7.. Gavriilidis P, Chrysanthopoulos K, Gerasimidou D, Extramammary Paget’s disease of the vulva: Case Rep, 2013; 2013; bcr2013200623

8.. Hinten F, Molijn A, Eckhardt L, Vulvar cancer: Two pathways with different localization and prognosis: Gynecol Oncol, 2018; 149; 310-17

9.. Zaren HA, Copeland EM, Inguinal node metastases: Cancer, 1978; 41; 919-23

10.. Yang ZG, Min PQ, Sone S, Tuberculosis versus lymphomas in the abdominal lymph nodes: Evaluation with contrast-enhanced CT: Am J Roentgenol, 1999; 172; 619-23

11.. Yanardag H, Caner M, Papila I, Diagnostic value of peripheral lymph node biopsy in sarcoidosis: A report of 67 cases: Can Respir J, 2007; 14; 209-11

12.. Mancino P, Ucciferri C, Falasca K: Infez Med, 2008; 16; 91-93

13.. Way S, Hunterian Lecture: Hunterian Lecture delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons of England on 13th February, 1948: Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1948; 3; 187

14.. Bickley L: Bates’ guide to physical examination and history-taking 11th, 2012; 10-13, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

15.. Evans BJ, Kiellerup FD, Stanley RO, A communication skills programme for increasing patients’ satisfaction with general practice consultations: Br J Med Psychol, 1987; 60(4); 373-78

16.. Fizazi K, Greco FA, Pavlidis N, Pentheroudakis G, Cancers of unknown primary site: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up: Ann Oncol, 2011; 22; vi64-68

17.. Chu P, Wu E, Weiss LM, Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 expression in epithelial neoplasms: A survey of 435 cases: Mod Pathol, 2000; 13; 962-72

18.. Zhao Y, Gong X, Li N, Primary extramammary Paget’s disease: A clinicopathological study of 28 cases: Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2019; 12; 3426-32

Figures

Figure 1.. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography obtained at the first visit to our hospital in the tenth month of illness. (A) The lymph nodes in the left inguinal (arrowhead) and left external iliac regions (arrow) are enlarged. (B) Multiple lymph nodes are enhanced in the para-abdominal aortic region (white arrowheads).Figure 2.. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (CT) obtained 2 weeks after the first visit to our hospital. The image shows high uptake in the lymphadenopathies already detected by CT, with no other lesions showing high uptake.Figure 3.. Pathological findings of the lymph node biopsy specimens of the left inguinal lymph node. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (×200) showing infiltration and proliferation of malignant cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and round-shaped nuclei. (B) Gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP)-15 staining (×100) showing that some of the malignant cells identified by H&E staining are positive with GCDFP-15 staining.Figure 4.. Gross findings of the vulvar skin lesions. Erythematous lesions with erosions spread from the area just above the clitoris, bilateral labia minora and labia majora, and left perineal area to the anus.Figure 5.. Pathological findings of the biopsy specimens of vulvar skin lesions. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (×400) showing Paget cells with bright cell bodies within the epidermis. (B) Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) staining (×200) showing that some of the malignant cells identified by H&E staining are positive with GCDFP-15 staining.

In Press

12 Feb 2024 : Case report  Germany

Diagnostic Challenges and Imaging Considerations for Intraparotid Facial Nerve Schwannoma: A Case Report an...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.942870  

0:00

12 Feb 2024 : Case report  USA

Erdheim-Chester Disease Occult on Radiographs and CT but Visible on MRI and PET

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.941169  

0:00

12 Feb 2024 : Case report  USA

Surgical Treatment of Spontaneous Superficial Temporal Artery Arteriovenous Malformation: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.942839  

13 Feb 2024 : Case report  Bahrain

Warfarin Woes: A Rare Case of Hemoperitoneum with Intramural Small Bowel Hematoma

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.943519  

Most Viewed Current Articles

10 Jan 2022 : Case report  Germany

A Report on the First 7 Sequential Patients Treated Within the C-Reactive Protein Apheresis in COVID (CACOV...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935263

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935263

19 Jul 2022 : Case report  Saudi Arabia

Atlantoaxial Subluxation Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Rare Orthopedic Complication from COVID-19

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.936128

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e936128

05 Mar 2022 : Case report  Brazil

Acute Limb Ischemia After Self-Injection of Crushed Morphine Tablets into the Radial Artery: Role of Infrar...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935336

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935336

02 Apr 2022 : Case report  Saudi Arabia

Infective Endocarditis Caused by Pseudomonas luteola in a Pediatric Patient. A Case Report and Review of Li...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935743

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935743

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923