Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

25 October 2021: Articles  Poland

Advanced Leiomyosarcoma of the Retroperitoneal Space in a Kidney Transplant Recipient with a History of Peritoneal Dialysis: A Case Report

Rare disease

Olga Kaźmierczak1ABCEF*, Anna Kozaczka1AB, Aureliusz Kolonko2BDF, Maciej Kajor3BCD, Jacek Pająk3BCD, Jerzy Chudek1ADEF

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.933267

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e933267



BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma frequently occurs in patients who are on immunosuppressive therapy. It is the second most common sarcoma in this population and is often associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. We present a case of advanced leiomyosarcoma of the retroperitoneal space in a kidney transplant recipient and discuss additional risk factors for oncogenesis.

CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old woman with a history of peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation was diagnosed with multiple liver lesions. PET-CT scanning showed a metabolically active tumor in the left lumbar region with numerous liver focal lesions. The histological examination of the liver lesion biopsy identified advanced retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma with a high proliferative index and liver involvement. Unexpectedly, the relation with EBV infection was not proven. The patient was treated with first-line doxorubicin, with the simultaneous reduction of immunosuppression. Owing to disease progression after 6 cycles, the patient received second-line chemotherapy based on gemcitabine and docetaxel, which was terminated owing to unacceptable toxicity, despite an observed response. Third-line trabectedin-based therapy with good tolerance and stabilization of disease after 20 months was being maintained at the time of this report.

CONCLUSIONS: The increased cancer mortality in solid-organ transplant recipients requires an individualized approach and increased post-transplantation screening according to additional specific cancer risk factors. A further consideration is the hypothetical relevance of long-term peritoneal membrane irritation in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Keywords: case reports, Immunosuppression, Kidney Transplantation, Leiomyosarcoma, Peritoneal Dialysis, Epstein-Barr Virus Infections, Female, Herpesvirus 4, Human, Humans, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Retroperitoneal Space


Leiomyosarcoma is the second most common sarcoma after Kaposi sarcoma in patients undergoing maintenance of immunosuppressive treatment [1] and is one of the most common soft-tissue sarcomas in the general population [2]. It derives from smooth muscle cells of large veins or mesenchymal stem cells and is usually located in the retroperitoneal space. Of note, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in immunocompromised patients (including HIV-infected and organ transplant recipients) has been widely discussed as a potential risk factor for leiomyosarcoma [2,3] and its multifocal development [4]. Immunohistochemical assays fail to confirm the presence of viral genetic material in only 12% of cases [1].

It has been shown that the overall length and the net effect of immunosuppressive therapy increase the risk of carcinogenesis [5]. It is believed that increased gene expression for transforming growth factor beta-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor during therapy with certain immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclosporine A and tacrolimus, can promote tumor invasiveness and metastatic dissemination [6].

Case Report

A 44-year-old woman was admitted to the nephrology department with multiple liver lesions of unknown origin, which were identified during an abdominal ultrasound in January 2019. She had a Zubrod performance status of 0 and had a history of kidney transplantation (KTx) from a deceased donor, with basiliximab induction in May 2016 on a 3-drug maintenance immunosuppressive regimen (tacrolimus, mycophenolate sodium, and prednisone). She had experienced mild right upper abdominal pain for a few months prior to her presentation, which did not require painkillers.

The patient had a medical history of right-sided nephrectomy and systemic therapy for nephroblastoma at the age of 6 years. She had chronic interstitial pyelonephritis of the remaining kidney, not associated with ureterovesical reflux and without confirmed immune deficiencies, which eventually led to end-stage kidney failure, with the initiation of automated peritoneal dialysis for 27 months before KTx. Comorbidity included type 2 diabetes and subtotal thyroidectomy, with parathyroidectomy performed in October 2015 owing to secondary hyperparathyroidism and a colloid goiter.

The patient’s laboratory tests performed on admission were within the reference range with optimal kidney graft function (serum creatinine concentration of 1.1 mg/dL; normal urinalysis).

She underwent an abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan, which showed more than 25 poorly vascularized metastatic lesions in the liver. The lesions were an average diameter of 10 mm to 25 mm, and there was a 38-mm tumor in the small pelvis next to the left iliac vessel (adhered to the larger lumbar muscle on the left side, left iliac artery, and the small intestinal loop), with heterogeneous gaining after administration of contrast media. A similar lesion of 25×30 mm was found in the fundus of the uterus. We performed a PET-CT scan with 18F-FDG in search of the primary lesion. The scan revealed a metabolically active tumor in the left lumbar region, sized 49×41×44 mm (Figure 1A), and numerous liver focal lesions up to 22 mm (Figure 1B).

The patient underwent an ultrasound-guided core biopsy of the liver lesions.

Histological examination revealed metastasis of sarcoma, which was composed of large atypical, elongated cells with abundant, fibrillary cytoplasm forming irregular cellular fascicles (Figure 1C). Immunohistochemical staining revealed extensive expression of smooth muscle actin (Figure 1D, 1F), desmin (Figure 1E, 1G), and high Ki67 proliferative index (Figure 1H) but did not detect any expression of ALK-1 protein, HMB45, neuron-specific enolase, DOG-1, S-100 protein, or cytokeratines 34 and 117. The specimens also stained negative for EBV.

Therefore, a diagnosis of advanced retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma with liver involvement was established (cT1N0M1 CS IV).

The patient started chemotherapy with doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 every 21 days. The dosage of mycophenolate sodium was reduced from 1260 to 540 mg daily, and trough levels of tacrolimus were maintained at approximately 6 ng/mL. The patient’s tolerance of the first-line chemotherapy was good and she received subsequent cycles without delay. She did not experience any adverse events, including infectious complications and neutropenic fever.

Unfortunately, CT imaging after administration of 6 cycles showed progression in the primary retroperitoneal lesion and in the liver, with metastasis merging into a conglomerate of 64×51×50 mm. Owing to disease progression, the patient received a second-line chemotherapy based on gemcitabine (900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and docetaxel (100 mg/m2 on day 8) every 3 weeks. Despite the use of adequate premedication, she presented significant toxicity that was aggravated with every administration of docetaxel, including subcutaneous edema of the upper and lower extremities, generalized sensory neuropathy (CTCAE G3), and erythematous-desquamative lesions on the face and neck. Despite a mild size reduction of the primary lesion (by 19%) and metastatic lesions in the liver (stable disease, according to RECIST 1.1), we terminated the second-line chemotherapy owing to unacceptable toxicity. The patient was referred to another oncology center with access to trabectedin-based therapy. Since January 2020, the patient has been continuing courses of trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 every 21 days) with good tolerance and maintenance of stable disease status, reaching over 31 months of overall survival since the initial diagnosis. The kidney graft function is still excellent, despite a mycophenolate dosage reduction to 360 mg daily.


Soft-tissue sarcomas in patients after solid-organ transplantation usually have higher histological grading, and about 40% of patients are diagnosed in the metastatic phase of the disease [7]. Oncological treatment in patients with KTx should include all conventional pharmacological approaches, along with the concomitant consideration of the reduction of immunosuppression dosage. The median overall survival for advanced disease does not exceed 15 months [7].

Increased cancer risk is one of the major concerns in solid-organ transplant recipients. The 10-year risk of de novo cancer is twice as great in transplant recipients than in the general population [8]. De novo malignancies have tremendous impact on survival after solid-organ transplantation, as they have been reported as a leading cause of late mortality after transplantation [9]. One of the main causes of increased cancer incidence among patients with transplants is the common use of more intensive immunosuppressive therapies [10]. In KTx recipients, the use of tacrolimus and induction antibodies was proven to increase the risk of de novo post-transplantation malignancy [11]. It is worth noting that increased oncogenesis is observed already at the stage of chronic kidney disease and dialysis therapy [11,12]. Furthermore, the increasing age of the transplant population, longer organ survival, and exposure to oncogenic viruses also contribute to increased malignancy rates after transplantation [13,14].

Although soft-tissue sarcomas remain a rare type of cancer in KTx recipients, soft-tissue sarcomas are significantly more common in KTx recipients than in the general population: the standardized incidence ratio is 14.4 (95% CI: 9.2–19.5) in male patients and 4.5 (95% CI: 0.6–8.5) in female patients [15]. The diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma is often accidental and can occur at any point after transplantation. Interestingly, a different pattern of the primary location has been observed in patients with KTx, with 33% occurring in the head and neck, compared with only 5% in the head and neck in the general population [7,16].

In the present case, the specimen derived from the tumor did not demonstrate EBV activity. However, pre-transplantation EBV-positive recipient status in itself has been demonstrated to increase the risk of post-transplantation malignancy [13]. Nevertheless, several circumstances can be identified as potential factors that were conducive to the development of sarcoma in our patient. Above all, was the immunosuppressive therapy she received. Second, we cannot exclude a hypothetical relevance of the long-term exposure to dialysis fluid as an additional risk factor for carcinogenesis. It has been demonstrated that the high-glucose load in peritoneal dialysis fluid increases the formation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). AGEs then exert cancer-promoting effects, mediated by an interaction with the receptor for AGEs and increased oxidative stress, in addition to chronic inflammatory responses [17], which have been shown to be strong contributors of carcinogenesis [18,19]. Moreover, metabolic complications such as insulin resistance and low plasma adiponectin levels have been associated with the increased risk of malignancy, even in nondiabetic peritoneal dialysis patients [20]. Hence, we cannot exclude that, in our patient, peritoneal dialysis treatment and diabetes alongside immunosuppression might have been involved in the pathogenesis of the retroperitoneal sarcoma.


Certainly, substantially prolonged survival after KTx increases the cancer incidence and mortality in this cohort. According to a recent report, mortality attributable to cancer steadily increases after transplantation, reaching 15.7% of deaths in recipients that are more than 10 years past transplantation [21]. Despite regular ambulatory monitoring, cancers in KTx recipients are diagnosed in a more advanced stage as compared with those in the general population [22]. Importantly, imaging during this period is focused mainly on assessment of the graft and cirrhotic kidneys, and the guidelines for cancer screening vary greatly, depending on the screened organ, except for skin cancer [23]. Because patients after KTx present a markedly increased risk of malignancy complications, we strongly suggest individualizing post-transplantation screening, considering individual cancer risk, comorbidities, overall prognosis, and screening preferences.


1.. Bhatia K, Shiels MS, Berg A, Engels EA, Sarcomas other than Kaposi sarcoma occurring in immunodeficiency: interpretations from a systematic literature review: Curr Opin Oncol, 2012; 24(5); 537-46

2.. Duffaud F, Ray-Coquard I, Salas S, Pautier P, Recent advances in understanding and managing leiomyosarcomas: F1000Prime Rep, 2015; 7; 55

3.. Shannon-Lowe C, Rickinson A, The global landscape of EBV-associated tumors: Front Oncol, 2019; 9; 713

4.. Deyrup AT, Lee VK, Hill CE, Epstein-Barr virus-associated smooth muscle tumors are distinctive mesenchymal tumors reflecting multiple infection events: A clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of 29 tumors from 19 patients: Am J Surg Pathol, 2006; 30(1); 75-82

5.. Birkeland SA, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Is posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) caused by any specific immunosuppressive drug or by the transplantation per se?: Transplantation, 2003; 76(6); 984-88

6.. Krisl JC, Doan VP, Chemotherapy and transplantation: The role of immunosuppression in malignancy and a review of antineoplastic agents in solid organ transplant recipients: Am J Transplant, 2017; 17(8); 1974-91

7.. Husted TL, Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, De novo sarcomas in solid organ transplant recipients: Transplant Proc, 2002; 34(5); 1786-87

8.. Collett D, Mumford L, Banner NR, Comparison of the incidence of malignancy in recipients of different types of organ: A UK Registry audit: Am J Transplant, 2010; 10(8); 1889-96

9.. Taborelli M, Piselli P, Ettorre GM, Survival after the diagnosis of de novo malignancy in liver transplant recipients: Int J Cancer, 2019; 144(2); 232-39

10.. Martinez OM, de Gruijl FR, Molecular and immunologic mechanisms of cancer pathogenesis in solid organ transplant recipients: Am J Transplant, 2008; 8(11); 2205-11

11.. Maisonneuve P, Agodoa L, Gellert R, Cancer in patients on dialysis for end-stage renal disease: An international collaborative study: Lancet, 1999; 354(9173); 93-99

12.. Lee YC, Hung SY, Wang HK, Is there different risk of cancer among end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis?: Cancer Med, 2018; 7(2); 485-98

13.. Sampaio MS, Cho YW, Qazi Y, Posttransplant malignancies in solid organ adult recipients: An analysis of the U.S. National Transplant Database: Transplantation, 2012; 94(10); 990-98

14.. Huo Z, Li C, Xu X, cancer risks in solid organ transplant recipients: Results from a comprehensive analysis of 72 cohort studies: Oncoimmunology, 2020; 9(1); 1848068

15.. Park B, Yoon J, Choi D, De novo cancer incidence after kidney and liver transplantation: Results from a nationwide population based data: Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1); 17202

16.. D’Arcy ME, Castenson D, Lynch CF, Risk of rare cancers among solid organ transplant recipients: J Natl Cancer Inst, 2021; 113(2); 199-207

17.. Schröter D, Höhn A, Role of advanced glycation end products in carcinogenesis and their therapeutic implications: Curr Pharm Des, 2018; 24(44); 5245-51

18.. Balkwill F, Mantovani A, Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow?: Lancet, 2001; 357(9255); 539-45

19.. Karin M, Nuclear factor-kappaB in cancer development and progression: Nature, 2006; 441(7092); 431-36

20.. Park JT, Yoo TH, Chang TI, Insulin resistance and lower plasma adiponectin increase malignancy risk in nondiabetic continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: Metabolism, 2011; 60(1); 121-26

21.. Noone AM, Pfeiffer RM, Dorgan JF, Cancer-attributable mortality among solid organ transplant recipients in the United States: 1987 through 2014: Cancer, 2019; 125(15); 2647-55

22.. Au E, Wong G, Chapman JR, Cancer in kidney transplant recipients: Nat Rev Nephrol, 2018; 14(8); 508-20

23.. Acuna SA, Huang JW, Scott AL, cancer screening recommendations for solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines: Am J Transplant, 2017; 17(1); 103-14

In Press

Case report  Portugal

Bartter Syndrome Presenting as Arginine-Vasopressin Resistance: A Report of 2 Cases

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.942872  

Case report  China (mainland)

Extended Left Hemihapatectomy with Right Hepatic Artery Reconstruction for Primary Hepatic Neuroendocrine N...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.943721  

Case report  Austria

Smoking-Associated Endotracheal Hair Growth: A Case Report on Tracheal Complications

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.943909  

Case report  Japan

Virtual Reality-Guided Simulation for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Patient with Anatomical Anoma...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.944485  

Most Viewed Current Articles

07 Mar 2024 : Case report  USA 38,124

Neurocysticercosis Presenting as Migraine in the United States

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133


10 Jan 2022 : Case report  Germany 31,073

A Report on the First 7 Sequential Patients Treated Within the C-Reactive Protein Apheresis in COVID (CACOV...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935263

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935263

19 Jul 2022 : Case report  Saudi Arabia 17,693

Atlantoaxial Subluxation Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Rare Orthopedic Complication from COVID-19

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.936128

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e936128

23 Feb 2022 : Case report  USA 17,607

Penile Necrosis Associated with Local Intravenous Injection of Cocaine

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.935250

Am J Case Rep 2022; 23:e935250

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923