30 December 2024: Articles
Multiple Gas-Containing Renal Stones: A Case Report
Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Rare disease
Mohammed Imran QuraishiDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.946317
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e946317
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emphysematous urinary tract infections are rare and serious conditions that are often multifactorial in etiology and may be associated with the presence of renal stones. Diagnosis can be made by finding gas within the renal collecting system or parenchyma. However, the radiographic finding of gas within a renal stone is rare and little has been published to describe the significance of this finding, its promoting factors, and management. While finding a single gas-containing renal stone is rare, we present a patient with multiple gas-containing stones.
CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old woman with a history of diabetes and recurrent nephrolithiasis was found to have multiple gas-containing renal stones during a workup of gross hematuria. She was currently being treated for a urinary tract infection. Imaging revealed multiple stones with central encapsulated air and hydronephrosis. She underwent subsequent lithotripsy and stent placement due to this concerning finding, but developed sepsis 2 days following treatment. Cultures from the lithotripsy isolated Proteus mirabilis. It is hypothesized that lithotripsy resulted in endotoxin-mediated sepsis.
CONCLUSIONS: Proper management of gas-containing renal stones in the setting of urinary tract infections includes broad-spectrum antibiotics (carbapenem plus vancomycin if obstruction is present) followed by drainage via percutaneous nephrostomy and then stone removal. Immediate lithotripsy should be avoided in cases of emphysematous pyelonephritis as it can result in endotoxin-mediates sepsis.
Keywords: Lithotripsy, nephrolithiasis, Proteus mirabilis, Pyelonephritis, Urinary Tract Infections, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Kidney Calculi, emphysema, Gases, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Introduction
Gas formation within the renal system can occur secondary to several causes, including recent instrumentation or infection. When caused by infection, this is a serious condition that is often associated with renal calculi. However, the radiographic finding of gas within the renal calculus itself is a much rarer phenomenon, with only about 12 cases being described [1]. The presence of a gas-containing stone can occur alongside a gas-forming infection, which can be life threatening [2].
The most common predisposing factors associated with the formation of gas-containing renal stones in the setting of infection have been reported to be female sex and comorbid medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, gout, hyperparathyroidism, and sarcoidosis [3,4]. In addition, most patients have experienced prior stone events [3]. The presentation of patients with this finding varies from signs of sepsis to isolated flank pain [1–5]. While the finding of a single gas-containing renal calculus is rare, we present a case of a 63-year-old woman who was found to have multiple gas-containing calculi and developed subsequent sepsis following antibiotic treatment and lithotripsy.
Case Report
A 63-year-old White woman presented to the urology clinic for cystoscopy. Her medical history was significant for diabetes mellitus with a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) of 8.0%, hypertension, obesity, and Grave’s disease (status-post radioactive iodine therapy). Her home medications included Bactrim (sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim) for a urinary tract infection (UTI), fexofenadine, glimepiride, Canagliflozin, losartan, and levothyroxine. Her family history was significant for a brother with nephrolithiasis.
She had been following with the urology service for a history of right-sided partial ureteral obstruction at the ureteropelvic junction and prior episodes of obstructive nephrolithiasis and urolithiasis. Since her last visit, she had a new episode of hematuria and underwent computed tomography (CT) prior to her appointment, which revealed multiple stones in the right renal pelvis with fully encapsulated central air. The largest was 2.5×0.9×2.6 cm. The ureteropelvic junction was also noted to be strictured with a tortuous proximal ureter, which was likely congenital, but worsened due to recurrent nephrolithiasis, causing obstruction and urinary stasis (Figure 1). Her most recent prior CT scan was performed 2 years prior and revealed persistent right-sided hydronephrosis, renal parenchymal scarring, and a small right renal calculus. However, no gas was present in this prior scan. Given this new finding of gas within renal stones, she was advised to continue her antibiotic treatment and undergo surgical intervention. A urine culture and antibiogram were not obtained prior to intervention.
She subsequently underwent laser lithotripsy with ureteral stent placement 1 week later. Intraoperatively, the stones were noted to be calcified externally with a mucoid consistency internally. Cultures of the calculi were sent following the procedure and showed heavy growth of
Discussion
The literature focuses on the radiographic findings of air within the renal collecting system (emphysematous pyelitis) or parenchyma (emphysematous pyelonephritis), but few reports exist regarding the radiographic findings of gas within a renal calculus. Emphysematous pyelitis will be limited to air within the pelvicalyceal system, while emphysematous pyelonephritis, a much more serious condition, will demonstrate gas within the renal parenchyma, collecting system, and perinephric tissues [6]. In this case, we demonstrate intra-calculus gas, which appeared as central air encapsulated by the stone and its potential complications.
The pathophysiology underlying gas-containing renal stones is multifactorial but is often related to a combination of infectious and metabolic etiologies. In general, females are more likely to experience a urinary tract infection than males due to their shorter urethra. In the United States, over 60% of women will have a UTI at least once in their lifetime [7]. Our patient was female and also had ureteropelvic junction stenosis on her CT scan, likely causing urinary stasis, a predisposing cause of urinary tract infections. Her ureteropelvic junction stenosis developed over years of recurrent stone disease.
Our patient was diabetic with a HbA1C of 8.0%. Diabetes mellitus with poor glycemic control has been found to be a host factor strongly associated with emphysematous pyelonephritis [8]. Multiple pathways for this association have been proposed, such as higher glucose concentrations within the urine or renal parenchyma, immune system impairment, or dysfunctional voiding and urinary retention [9], all of which would create a favorable environment for bacteria to form.
Gas-producing bacteria form carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and hydrogen by metabolism of glucose [10]. In most cases,
Another factor is the role of pharmacologic agents in the development of urinary tract infections and renal stones. Our patient was taking Canagliflozin for her diabetes, which inhibits renal glucose reabsorption, thus increasing glucosuria and predisposing to urinary tract infections [12]. Other medications, such as loop diuretics, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, or certain antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin, can also predispose to renal stones [13].
Given the severity of emphysematous renal infections, management includes broad-spectrum antibiotics followed by drainage if an obstruction is present and then definitive stone removal at a later time [3]. Antibiotics include a carbapenem or cephalosporin plus vancomycin, and then narrower coverage once culture results are obtained. Proceeding directly to stone removal is an option if the patient does not exhibit signs of sepsis [3]. At the time of presentation, our patient appeared clinically stable and we proceeded directly to lithotripsy and stent placement. Unfortunately, she re-presented with sepsis 2 days following the procedure.
While lithotripsy has proven to be an effective method of treating urinary stones, urosepsis is a potential complication [14]. When bacteria are inactivated during lithotripsy, they release many lipopolysaccharides and endotoxins, which can cause an inflammatory response and septicemia [15,16]. Although antibiotics are unable to penetrate infected renal stones [17], they are recommended prophylactically along with percutaneous drainage first to avoid this complication [16]. In our patient, it is likely
Conclusions
Emphysematous renal infections are multifactorial conditions requiring urgent attention and are often associated with renal stones. They rarely present with the radiologic finding of gas-containing renal stones. These stones are differentiated from typical nephrolithiasis by an area of encapsulated air within the calculus. Proper management includes broad-spectrum antibiotics (carbapenem plus vancomycin if obstruction is present) and drainage. Lithotripsy should be avoided in the setting of gas-containing renal or ureteral stones to avoid endotoxin-mediated sepsis.
Figures
References:
1.. Wazzan MA, Abduljabbar AH, Gas containing renal stone – case report: Urol Case Rep, 2019; 25; 100887
2.. Hammad FT, Gas-containing renal matrix stones in a patient with emphysematous pyelitis treated with delayed percutaneous nephrolithotomy: J Endourol Case Rep, 2020; 6(4); 445-47
3.. Manny TB, Mufarrij PW, Lange JN, Gas-containing renal stones: Findings from five consecutive patients: Urology, 2012; 80(6); 1203-8
4.. Paterson RF, Welsch JM, Koerner T, Lingeman JE, Urinary calculus containing gas: Urology, 2002; 60(1); 164
5.. Peter J, Bhat S, Paul F, Gas-containing renal stones: Indian J Urol, 2020; 36(1); 67-68
6.. Nepal P, Ojili V, Kaur N, Gas where it shouldn’t be! Imaging spectrum of emphysematous infections in the abdomen and pelvis: Am J Roentgenol, 2021; 216(3); 812-23
7.. Papp SB, Christie AL, Zimmern PE, Characteristics of nationwide urinary tract infection (UTI) visits by age and type II diabetes status in women: Cureus, 2023; 15(9); e46000
8.. Tseng CC, Wu JJ, Wang MC, Host and bacterial virulence factors predisposing to emphysematous pyelonephritis: Am J Kidney Dis, 2005; 46(3); 432-39
9.. Nitzan O, Elias M, Chazan B, Saliba W, Urinary tract infections in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Review of prevalence, diagnosis, and management: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2015; 8; 129-36
10.. Huang JJ, Chen KW, Ruaan MK, Mixed acid fermentation of glucose as a mechanism of emphysematous urinary tract infection: J Urol, 1991; 146(1); 148-51
11.. Armbruster CE, Mobley HLT, Pearson MM: EcoSal Plus., 2018; 8(1) ESP-0009-2017
12.. Nicolle LE, Capuano G, Fung A, Usiskin K, Urinary tract infection in randomized phase III studies of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor.: Postgrad Med, 2014; 126(1); 7-17
13.. Matlaga BR, Shah OD, Assimos DG, Drug-induced urinary calculi: Rev Urol, 2003; 5(4); 227-31
14.. Cochran JS, Robinson SN, Crane VS, Jones DG, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Use of antibiotics to avoid postprocedural infection: Postgrad Med, 1988; 83(6); 199-204
15.. Gutiérrez J, Alvarez UM, Mues E, Inactivation of bacteria inoculated inside urinary stone-phantoms using intracorporeal lithotripters: Urol Res, 2008; 36(1); 67-72
16.. Gómez-Núñez JG, Alvarez UM, Fernández F, Infected urinary stones, endotoxins and urosepsis.: Clinical management of complicated urinary tract infection., 2011, IntechOpen
17.. Khusid JA, Hordines JC, Sadiq AS, Prevention and management of infectious complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery.: Front Surg, 2021; 8; 718583
Figures
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






