14 March 2026: Articles
A 43-Year-Old Man With Isolated Cutaneous Lymphomatoid Granulomatosis Presenting as a Chronic Necrotizing Ulcer of the Upper Arm
Challenging differential diagnosis, Rare disease, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Adebola Oluwabusayo AdetiloyeDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.951661
Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e951661
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We report a 43-year-old man with ulcerative lesions of the right arm without pulmonary symptoms that was diagnosed as cutaneous lymphomatoid granulomatosis, a rare Epstein Barr virus–associated angiocentric and angiodestructive lymphoproliferative disorder that most commonly involves the lungs. Cutaneous involvement usually occurs in association with pulmonary disease, while isolated cutaneous disease is rare and most often presents with papules, nodules, or plaques. Necrotizing ulcers are uncommon and can closely mimic other dermatologic conditions.
CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old man presented with a 6-month history of chronic necrotizing ulcers of the right upper arm, accompanied by low-grade fever and malaise. Laboratory investigations revealed mild leukopenia, normocytic anemia, mildly elevated inflammatory markers, and impaired renal function. Blood cultures and interferon-gamma release assay for tuberculosis were negative. Magnetic resonance imaging of the right arm demonstrated findings consistent with myonecrosis involving the brachial and brachioradialis muscles. Wound biopsy cultures were negative for bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial organisms. Histopathologic examination, immunohistochemical analysis, and positivity for Epstein-Barr virus–encoded RNA established a diagnosis of grade 3 lymphomatoid granulomatosis. Further evaluation revealed nonspecific findings on chest computed tomography and end-stage kidney disease, necessitating initiation of hemodialysis. The patient was discharged after a 4-week hospitalization with plans for outpatient oncology and nephrology follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Isolated cutaneous lymphomatoid granulomatosis is a rare but important diagnostic consideration in patients with chronic necrotizing skin ulcers and negative infectious evaluations. Early histopathologic assessment, including testing for Epstein-Barr virus, is essential for timely diagnosis and appropriate management.
Keywords: Case Reports, Ulcer
Introduction
Lymphomatoid granulomatosis (LYG) is a rare Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated angiocentric and angiodestructive lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by an atypical proliferation of EBV-infected B cells within a reactive T-cell background [1]. First described by Liebow in 1972, LYG is considered part of the spectrum of EBV-driven B-cell lymphoproliferative diseases, with potential for transformation to overt lymphoma if untreated [1]. The lungs are the most involved organ, presenting in over 90% of cases with bilateral nodular infiltrates; however, extra-pulmonary manifestations are well documented, particularly involving the central nervous system, skin, liver, and kidneys [1].
Cutaneous involvement is the most frequent extrapulmonary manifestation, occurring in up to 45% of cases and typically in association with pulmonary disease [1,2]. Skin lesions are generally nonspecific, most often presenting as papules, nodules, or indurated plaques and less commonly as ulcerative or necrotic plaques that can resemble infections, vasculitis, or other inflammatory dermatoses [2,3]. Due to its rarity and heterogeneous presentation, cutaneous LYG poses a diagnostic challenge, particularly when it presents with isolated or atypical skin findings in the absence of pulmonary symptoms [4,5]. Delayed recognition can lead to progression to higher-grade disease and systemic dissemination [6,7]. In this report, we present a rare case of LYG manifesting as a chronic, necrotizing, non-healing ulcer of the upper arm, with no pulmonary symptoms at presentation. This unusual isolated cutaneous manifestation highlights the need for heightened clinical suspicion and early histological evaluation in persistent ulcerative skin lesions of unclear etiology.
Case Report
A 43-year-old man with no significant past medical history presented to the emergency department with a 6-month history of non-healing, painful ulcers on the anterior and lateral aspect of the right upper arm. The lesions began as small papules, which progressively ulcerated with associated necrotic eschar and purulent discharge. He reported experiencing tiredness, low-grade fever, and nausea but denied prior trauma, insect bite, weight loss, chronic cough, or night sweats. His vital signs on admission were within normal limits except for elevated blood pressure of 143/81 mmHg. Physical examination revealed a deep, irregular ulcer with undermined edges and necrotic base measuring approximately 4×5 cm and 3×4 cm, surrounded by erythema, edema, and induration (Figure 1). He had mild ankle swelling and pale conjunctiva, while chest, cardiovascular, neurological, and abdominal examinations were unremarkable. No regional lymphadenopathy was noted. Initial differential diagnosis included pyoderma gangrenosum, deep fungal infection, cutaneous tuberculosis, and vasculitic ulcer.
Laboratory investigations showed mild leukopenia (white blood cells 3700 k/μL [reference range. 3.8–10.5k/uL]), normocytic anemia with hemoglobin level of 8.2 g/dL (reference, 13.9–16.3 gm/dL), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 40 mm/h (reference, <15 mm/h), and mildly elevated C-reactive protein level of 45 mg/L (reference, 5–10 mg/L). Blood urea nitrogen and creatinine were both elevated: blood urea nitrogen, 98 mg/dL (reference, 7–23 mg/dL); creatinine, 10.2 mg/dL (reference, 0.7–1.2mg/dL). The estimated glomerular filtration rate was 6 mL/min/1.72 m2 by CKD EPI (reference, >60 mL/min/1.72 m2). Serum calcium levels ranged from 8.5 to 8.9 mg/dL (reference, 8.4–10.5 mg/dL), serum phosphorus was elevated at 5.3 mg/dL (reference, 2.5–4.5 mg/dL), and parathyroid hormone levels were elevated at 393 pg/mL (reference, 10–65 pg/mL). Urinalysis showed greater than 300 mg/dL (negative) of protein, without red blood cells. He was admitted for possible acute on chronic kidney disease and was started on hemodialysis. Glycated hemoglobin was 5.8%, consistent with prediabetes, hepatitis B serology showed chronic hepatitis B, while HIV and hepatitis C serologies were negative. Autoimmune markers, including anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, were all negative. Kidney ultrasound revealed bilateral shrunken kidneys with increased echogenicity. Hepatic panel showed hypoalbuminemia and hypoproteinemia. MRI of the right arm showed findings consistent with myonecrosis involving the brachial and brachioradialis muscles with possible cellulitis, but no evidence of osteomyelitis (Figure 2). He was started on intravenous ceftriaxone and linezolid for possible cellulitis. Based on his renal function test results, calciphylaxis was also considered as a differential.
Wound swabs were positive for
Computed tomography of the chest demonstrated a solitary 5-mm pulmonary nodule in the right middle lobe without associated lymphadenopathy. Given its isolated, sub-centimeter, and nonspecific appearance, this finding was not considered radiographically consistent with pulmonary involvement by LYG, which characteristically manifests as multiple bilateral nodules (Figure 5). Computed tomography of the abdomen and head revealed no additional abnormalities. Testing for tuberculosis using the QuantiFERON assay returned a negative result. End-stage kidney disease (CKD G5D) was diagnosed, characterized by a persistent glomerular filtration rate of less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 and initiation of maintenance dialysis during hospitalization. After a 4-week hospitalization, the patient was discharged with plans for an outpatient whole-body PET scan to assess the extent and distribution of disease, along with scheduled oncology and nephrology follow-up. The patient was lost to follow-up after discharge.
Discussion
LYG is a rare, EBV-driven B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by angiocentric and angiodestructive infiltrates, predominantly affecting extranodal sites such as the lungs, skin, and central nervous system [1]. Initially described by Liebow in 1972, the disorder has since been classified by the World Health Organization as a distinct entity within the group of EBV-positive B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, with disease grading from I to III based on the degree of cytologic atypia and necrosis [1,8].
The pathogenesis of LYG centers on the proliferation of EBV-infected B cells within a reactive background of reactive T lymphocytes [9]. Under normal circumstances, host immune surveillance contains EBV-infected cells, but failure of this mechanism, often from immunodeficiency, allows uncontrolled proliferation of infected B cells [9,10]. The angiocentric and angiodestructive nature of the disease leads to vascular compromise, tissue necrosis, and variable organ involvement [9,11–13]. Immunodeficient states, including those associated with HIV, post-transplant immunosuppression, and autoimmune conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis, have been identified as risk factors for disease development [14]. Epidemiologically, LYG is extremely rare with exact incidence unknown. It typically affects middle-aged adults between the ages of 40 and 60 years and exhibits a notable male predominance, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2: 1 [1,9,14,15].
Clinically, LYG most commonly presents with pulmonary symptoms, due to its predilection for the lungs in over 90% of patients [1,9,12]. Patients mostly develop respiratory symptoms, such as cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, or constitutional symptoms, including fever, night sweats, and weight loss [9,14]. Only about one-to two-thirds of patients develop significant respiratory symptoms that prompt imaging, while the rest are diagnosed incidentally through abnormal pulmonary findings on imaging [1,9]. Extrapulmonary manifestations are also well documented and include involvement of the central nervous system, skin, liver, and kidneys [1,9]. However, extrapulmonary-only presentations are rare [16,17].
Cutaneous involvement occurs in approximately 40% to 50% of cases and may precede, accompany, or follow pulmonary disease [1,14]. The range of skin lesions is broad, including erythematous papules, nodules, and plaques, as well as less commonly, ulcerated or necrotic lesions, which are frequently disseminated across the entire body [2,9,18,19]. However, isolated cutaneous presentations, particularly necrotizing ulcers confined to the extremities, trunk, or head and neck, are uncommon and may result in diagnostic delay, as they can mimic a wide range of more prevalent dermatologic and infectious conditions, thereby permitting progression to higher-grade disease with systemic dissemination [9,19,20]. In the present case, the patient presented with a chronic necrotizing ulcer of the upper arm accompanied by malaise and low-grade fever, without pulmonary involvement. In contrast, reported cases and literature reviews of cutaneous LYG most commonly describe maculopapular eruptions or subcutaneous nodules without ulceration or drainage, often with widespread distribution [7,19]. This atypical presentation highlights the diagnostic challenge of LYG, particularly in the absence of characteristic pulmonary and cutaneous manifestations. The differential diagnoses for such cutaneous ulcers are broad and include pyoderma gangrenosum, cutaneous tuberculosis, deep fungal infections, atypical mycobacterial infections, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and cutaneous manifestations of systemic lymphomas [21]. In our patient, the isolation of
Computed tomography revealed a solitary 5-mm pulmonary nodule that was considered nonspecific and not radiographically characteristic of pulmonary LYG, which typically manifests as multiple bilateral peribronchovascular or subpleural nodules, frequently cavitary, with surrounding ground-glass opacities and a relapsing–remitting pattern [22,23]. The patient had no respiratory symptoms or other evidence of pulmonary involvement. Given the small size and low-risk imaging features, a biopsy was not performed. Our patient was also diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease at presentation. Although LYG lesions are frequently identified in the kidneys at autopsy, clinically significant renal disease is rare, as these lesions are typically silent and remain asymptomatic during life [24].
Histopathologic evaluation remains the cornerstone of diagnosis, with classic features including angiocentric and angiodestructive infiltrates, extensive necrosis, and the presence of EBV- positive large B cells amid a dense reactive T-cell background [22]. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization for EBER are essential for confirming the diagnosis [13,22,25]. LYG is histologically graded into 3 categories (grades 1 to 3) based on the number of EBV-positive large atypical B cells and the degree of necrosis, which correlates with clinical aggressiveness and prognosis [8,13]. Grade 1 lesions contain few EBV-positive large B cells scattered within a dense background of reactive T lymphocytes, with minimal necrosis; grade 2 shows an intermediate number of EBV-positive large B cells with more conspicuous cytologic atypia and focal necrosis; and grade 3 is characterized by numerous EBV-positive large atypical B cells forming sheets with extensive necrosis, often indistinguishable from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [8,13].
Management of LYG is guided by histologic grade and clinical severity. Patients with low-grade disease (grade 1 to 2) may respond to immunomodulatory therapies, including interferon-alpha or monoclonal anti-CD20 therapy with rituximab [4,26,27]. In contrast, high-grade disease (grade 3), which resembles diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, typically requires systemic chemotherapy. The most used regimen is R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) [9,28]. Central nervous system involvement can necessitate the addition of high-dose methotrexate or intrathecal therapy, and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may be considered in refractory cases [29,30]. Our patient was diagnosed with grade 3 LYG based on histologic features, with EBER in situ hybridization demonstrating strong nuclear staining in numerous atypical large B cells, exceeding 50 cells per high-power field, and was being worked up prior to R-CHOP chemotherapy. However, he was lost to outpatient follow-up with the oncologist. Prognosis in LYG is variable and often depends on disease grade, organ involvement, and the timeliness of treatment. Early diagnosis and prompt initiation of appropriate therapy significantly improve outcomes, whereas untreated or delayed cases can progress to overt high-grade lymphoma or result in multiorgan failure [22].
Conclusions
This case highlights an uncommon presentation of LYG manifesting as isolated, chronic necrotizing cutaneous ulcers in the absence of overt pulmonary involvement. Given the rarity and protean clinical features of cutaneous LYG, particularly when presenting without respiratory symptoms, diagnosis is frequently delayed. LYG should be considered in patients with persistent, unexplained necrotizing skin lesions after exclusion of common infectious and noninfectious causes. Early histopathologic assessment with immunohistochemistry and EBV testing is essential for accurate diagnosis, appropriate grading, and timely initiation of therapy, which are critical determinants of prognosis. Failure to recognize the condition early can result in disease progression with subsequent systemic dissemination.
Figures
Figure 1. Examination of the right upper arm revealed a deep, irregular ulcer with undermined edges and necrotic base measuring approximately 4×5 cm and 3×4 cm, surrounded by erythema and induration (blue arrows).
Figure 2. Coronal magnetic resonance imaging of the right arm showing diffuse hyperintense signal within the brachial and brachioradialis muscles with associated subcutaneous edema, consistent with myonecrosis and cellulitis. No abnormal marrow signal is seen to suggest osteomyelitis.
Figure 3. Histopathologic findings of the right upper extremity wound biopsy.Hematoxylin and eosin staining at original magnification ×10 demonstrates lymphocytic vasculitis with transmural infiltration of the vessel wall (A), with similar findings confirmed at ×20 magnification (B). Immunohistochemical staining for cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) at ×10 magnification highlights a background population of reactive T lymphocytes characteristic of lymphomatoid granulomatosis (C). Immunohistochemical staining for CD20 at ×20 magnification demonstrates neoplastic B lymphocytes infiltrating and destroying the vascular walls (D). Immunohistochemical staining for CD30 at ×20 magnification highlights tumor cells within vessel walls (E). Paired box gene 5 immunohistochemical staining at ×40 magnification confirms B-cell lineage of the neoplastic cells (F). Epstein-Barr virus–encoded RNA in situ hybridization at ×40 (G) and ×60 (H) magnification demonstrates strong positivity within the tumor cells, supporting a diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus–associated lymphomatoid granulomatosis, grade 3.
Figure 4. Representative excerpt from a clinically obtained next-generation sequencing report performed on the patient’s cutaneous biopsy specimen, demonstrating EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder consistent with grade 3 lymphomatoid granulomatosis and absence of clinically actionable lymphoma-associated mutations. The analysis demonstrated an ATM p. (Asn2282Ser) variant of unknown clinical significance, with no clinically relevant mutations detected in a panel of lymphoma-associated genes (including TP53, BCL2, MYC, and JAK2). Histopathology confirmed tumor involvement comprising >50% of nuclei in the sample.
Figure 5. Computed tomography of the chest in lung window (axial view) shows a 5-mm right middle lung nodule (blue arrow). There is no associated mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy. References
1. Liebow AA, Carrington CRB, Friedman PJ, Lymphomatoid granulomatosis: Hum Pathol, 1972; 3(4); 457-58
2. Beaty MW, Toro J, Sorbara L, Cutaneous lymphomatoid granulomatosis: Correlation of clinical and biologic features: Am J Surg Pathol, 2001; 25(9); 1111-20
3. Ragage F, Parrens M, Banos ALymphomatoid granulomatosis after treatment of an acute myeloid leukemia: Ann Pathol, 2006; 26(1); 22-25 [in French]
4. Song JY, Pittaluga S, Dunleavy K, Lymphomatoid granulomatosis, a single institute experience: Pathologic findings and clinical correlations: Am J Surg Pathol, 2015; 39(2); 141
5. Shaigany S, Weitz NA, Husain S, A case of lymphomatoid granulomatosis presenting with cutaneous lesions: JAAD Case Rep, 2015; 1(4); 234
6. Ha YW, Kim CH, Park Y, Rare case of pulmonary lymphomatoid granulomatosis in conjunction with tuberculosis: Medicine (Baltimore), 2017; 96(42); e8323
7. Russell DP, Byrd RC, Googe P, Smoldering cutaneous course of lymphomatoid granulomatosis: JAAD Case Rep, 2022; 21; 66-69
8. Li W: The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors, 2022; 1-21, Leukemia
9. Melani C, Jaffe ES, Wilson WH, Pathobiology and treatment of lymphomatoid granulomatosis, a rare EBV-driven disorder: Blood, 2020; 135(16); 1344
10. Makol A, Kosuri K, Tamkus D, Lymphomatoid granulomatosis masquerading as interstitial pneumonia in a 66-year-old man: A case report and review of literature: J Hematol Oncol, 2009; 2(1); 1-6
11. Quintanilla-Martinez L, Swerdlow SH, Tousseyn T, New concepts in EBV-associated B, T, and NK cell lymphoproliferative disorders: Virchows Arch, 2023; 482(1); 227-44
12. Wilson WH, Kingma DW, Raffeld M, Wittes RE, Jaffe ES, Association of lymphomatoid granulomatosis with Epstein-Barr viral infection of B lymphocytes and response to interferon-α2b: Blood, 1996; 87(11); 4531-37
13. Colby TV, Current histological diagnosis of lymphomatoid granulomatosis: Mod Pathol, 2012; 25(1); 39-42
14. Balakrishnan P, Ing M, Househ Z, Raguparan A, Pulmonary lymphomatoid granulomatosis: An uncommon disease but not to be forgotten – a single centre experience: Respirol Case Reports, 2021; 9(7); e00789
15. Katzenstein ALA, Doxtader E, Narendra S, Lymphomatoid granulomatosis: Insights gained over 4 decades: Am J Surg Pathol, 2010; 34(12); e35-48
16. Wong DLY, Lehn AC, Central nervous system lymphomatoid granulomatosis without pulmonary involvement: A case report: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2017; 88(5); e1
17. Sigamani E, Chandramohan J, Nair S, Lymphomatoid granulomatosis: A case series from South India: Indian J Pathol Microbiol, 2018; 61(2); 228-32
18. Carlson KC, Gibson LE, Cutaneous signs of lymphomatoid granulomatosis: Arch Dermatol, 1991; 127(11); 1693-98
19. James WD, Odom RB, Katzenstein ALA, Cutaneous manifestations of lymphomatoid granulomatosis: Report of 44 cases and a review of the literature: Arch Dermatol, 1981; 117(4); 196-202
20. Wood ML, Harrington CI, Slater DN, Cutaneous lymphomatoid granulomatosis: A rare cause of recurrent skin ulceration: Br J Dermatol, 1984; 110(5); 619-25
21. Panuncialman J, Falanga V, Unusual causes of cutaneous ulceration: Surg Clin North Am, 2010; 90(6); 1161
22. Roschewski M, Wilson WH, Lymphomatoid granulomatosis: Cancer J, 2012; 18(5); 469-74
23. Chung JH, Wu CC, Gilman MD, Lymphomatoid granulomatosis: CT and FDG-PET findings: Korean J Radiol, 2011; 12(6); 671
24. Abeln EL, Paushter DM, Mehta A, Computed tomography of renal lymphomatoid granulomatosis: J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1988; 12(4); 671-73
25. McNiff JM, Cooper D, Howe G, Lymphomatoid granulomatosis of the skin and lung: An angiocentric T-cell-rich B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder: Arch Dermatol, 1996; 132(12); 1464-70
26. Melani C, Dowdell K, Pittaluga S, Interferon alfa-2b in patients with low-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis and chemotherapy with DA-EPOCH-R in patients with high-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis: An open-label, single-centre, phase 2 trial: Lancet Haematol, 2023; 10(5); e346-58
27. Ishiura H, Morikawa M, Hamada M, Lymphomatoid granulomatosis involving central nervous system successfully treated with rituximab alone: Arch Neurol, 2008; 65(5); 662-65
28. Fujiwara-Kuroda A, Iwashiro N, Kimura N, A case of resected pulmonary lymphomatoid granulomatosis: Respir Med Case Rep, 2020; 32; 101327
29. Cetin B, Benekli M, Akyurek N, Isolated primary lymphomatoid granulomatosis of central nervous system: Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus, 2011; 29(1); 39
30. Nilius-Eliliwi V, Treiber H, Seidel S, High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in primary lymphomatoid granulomatosis of the central nervous system: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2023; 149(9); 5729-32
Figures
Figure 1. Examination of the right upper arm revealed a deep, irregular ulcer with undermined edges and necrotic base measuring approximately 4×5 cm and 3×4 cm, surrounded by erythema and induration (blue arrows).
Figure 2. Coronal magnetic resonance imaging of the right arm showing diffuse hyperintense signal within the brachial and brachioradialis muscles with associated subcutaneous edema, consistent with myonecrosis and cellulitis. No abnormal marrow signal is seen to suggest osteomyelitis.
Figure 3. Histopathologic findings of the right upper extremity wound biopsy.Hematoxylin and eosin staining at original magnification ×10 demonstrates lymphocytic vasculitis with transmural infiltration of the vessel wall (A), with similar findings confirmed at ×20 magnification (B). Immunohistochemical staining for cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) at ×10 magnification highlights a background population of reactive T lymphocytes characteristic of lymphomatoid granulomatosis (C). Immunohistochemical staining for CD20 at ×20 magnification demonstrates neoplastic B lymphocytes infiltrating and destroying the vascular walls (D). Immunohistochemical staining for CD30 at ×20 magnification highlights tumor cells within vessel walls (E). Paired box gene 5 immunohistochemical staining at ×40 magnification confirms B-cell lineage of the neoplastic cells (F). Epstein-Barr virus–encoded RNA in situ hybridization at ×40 (G) and ×60 (H) magnification demonstrates strong positivity within the tumor cells, supporting a diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus–associated lymphomatoid granulomatosis, grade 3.
Figure 4. Representative excerpt from a clinically obtained next-generation sequencing report performed on the patient’s cutaneous biopsy specimen, demonstrating EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder consistent with grade 3 lymphomatoid granulomatosis and absence of clinically actionable lymphoma-associated mutations. The analysis demonstrated an ATM p. (Asn2282Ser) variant of unknown clinical significance, with no clinically relevant mutations detected in a panel of lymphoma-associated genes (including TP53, BCL2, MYC, and JAK2). Histopathology confirmed tumor involvement comprising >50% of nuclei in the sample.
Figure 5. Computed tomography of the chest in lung window (axial view) shows a 5-mm right middle lung nodule (blue arrow). There is no associated mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy. In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






