16 May 2026: Articles
Long-Term Response to Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: A Case Report
Unusual clinical course, Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment
Yuki Oshima ABCDEF 1, Takamasa Suzuki D 1, Yumi Fukaya D 1, Keiko Hosoya D 1, Yuko Tanaka D 1, Makoto Wakahara ABCDEF 1*, Yoshihisa Umekita CD 2, Yugo Tanaka ABCDEF 1DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952330
Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e952330
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MpBC), a rare subtype of breast malignancy characterized by low response rates to conventional chemotherapy, often presents as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Recently, systemic therapy including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a promising treatment option for TNBCs in perioperative or metastatic settings. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of ICIs for MpBC remains limited.
CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old Japanese woman underwent radical surgery for primary MpBC of the breast, which confirmed the triple-negative subtype. Despite adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, metastases to the sternum and lungs developed during treatment. Because the initial surgical specimen was PD-L1-positive, the treatment was changed to chemoimmunotherapy consisting of pembrolizumab, gemcitabine, and carboplatin based on the KEYNOTE-355 trial. Although the precordial mass and multiple lung metastases temporarily increased in size soon after treatment initiation, the metastatic lesions subsequently showed marked shrinkage. The patient developed treatment-related adrenal insufficiency, rash, pruritus, and anemia, all categorized as Grade 2. Hydrocortisone replacement therapy was initiated for adrenal insufficiency, while pembrolizumab was continued without interruption. Ten months after treatment initiation, carboplatin plus gemcitabine was discontinued because of adverse events, including myelosuppression, and the patient was transitioned to pembrolizumab monotherapy. At 30 months after the initiation of chemoimmunotherapy, PET/CT showed only mild ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the sternal metastasis, with no evidence of disease progression.
CONCLUSIONS: This report describes the successful treatment of metastatic MpBC with pembrolizumab-containing chemoimmunotherapy. Pembrolizumab combination therapy may be a promising treatment option for metastatic MpBC.
Keywords: Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Metaplastic, Case Reports, Pembrolizumab
Introduction
Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MpBC) is a rare subtype of breast malignancy that accounts for approximately 0.2% to 1% of all invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs) [1–3]. The majority of MpBCs are triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) that lack expression of estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PgRs), and ERBB2 (HER2) [2,4,5]. Given the limited therapeutic targets, MpBC treatment remains challenging. Moreover, studies have reported that MpBCs exhibit lower response rates to conventional adjuvant chemotherapy and worse clinical outcomes after chemotherapy compared with other types of TNBC [6–9]. Most MpBCs are resistant to systemic therapy and have a poor prognosis, with limited reports of successful systemic therapy.
Recently, the KEYNOTE-522 trial reported that perioperative systemic therapy including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improved the overall survival (OS) of patients with early-stage TNBC [10]. Moreover, the KEYNOTE-355 trial showed that chemoimmunotherapy led to clinically significant improvements in the progression-free survival of patients with advanced-stage TNBCs [11]. Given the rarity of MpBC and its unique clinical course compared with other types of TNBC, applying the results of these clinical trials to MpBCs remains controversial. A limited number of reports have demonstrated the remarkable therapeutic effects of chemoimmunotherapy for MpBC in perioperative or metastatic settings.
In our case, early recurrence was observed during conventional adjuvant therapy after upfront surgery for MpBC. However, chemoimmunotherapy based on the KEYNOTE-355 trial led to significant regression of the recurrent lesions, which remained shrunken for over 2 years.
Case Report
A 52-year-old Japanese woman noticed a rapidly growing mass in her left breast. She had no family history of cancer except for her mother, who had ovarian cancer. Physical examination revealed a 7.0×5.5-cm palpable mass in her left breast. Mammography showed a large mass with irregular margins and indistinct borders. Ultrasonography showed a hypoechoic mass measuring 5.5×4.8×3.2 cm, with suspicion of pectoralis muscle invasion. A vacuum-assisted biopsy of the breast mass revealed histological characteristics compatible with MpBC, which showed a triple-negative subtype. Moreover, the tumor cells were positive for AE1/AE3, CK5/6, and p63. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a tumor measuring 5.9×5.8×4.5 cm, with suspected invasion into the pectoralis major muscle (Figure 1). Staging positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) showed no regional or distant metastasis. Based on these findings, the patient was staged as cT3N0M0, Stage IIB MpBC. Given the patient’s maternal history of ovarian cancer, germline testing for
Discussion
MpBC has been considered a heterogeneous group of IBCs characterized by the differentiation of neoplastic epithelium into squamous cells and/or mesenchymal-appearing elements, including but not restricted to spindle, chondroid, and osseous cells [12]. MpBC can be classified into 6 subtypes: low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma, fibromatosis-like MpBC, spindle cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, MpBC with mesenchymal differentiation, and mixed MpBC [12]. Among these subtypes, high-grade spindle cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and high-grade adenosquamous carcinoma have particularly poor prognoses [13,14]. The vast majority of MpBCs are TNBCs [2]. Moreover, MpBCs have shown poor response to conventional chemotherapy and OS outcomes compared with other forms of TNBCs [8]. Takala et al reported that among patients receiving palliative chemotherapy including anthracyclines, cyclophosphamide, taxanes, and cisplatin, a partial response was observed in only 6% of cases and stable disease in 18%, resulting in a median OS time with metastatic disease of only 3.4 months [15].
In recent years, chemoimmunotherapy using pembrolizumab or atezolizumab has been approved for the treatment of metastatic TNBCs, whereas ICIs have commonly been used as first-line treatments for TNBCs with PD-L1 expression [11,16,17]. Pembrolizumab has also been approved as a perioperative therapy for TNBCs. Studies have shown that neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improves pathological complete response (pCR) rates, event-free survival, and OS compared with chemotherapy alone, regardless of PD-L1 status [10,18,19]. However, given that histological subtypes of breast carcinomas had not been mentioned in the eligibility criteria, it remains unclear whether MpBCs were included in these trials. MpBCs have higher rates of PD-L1 positivity than other forms of TNBCs. In fact, Joneja et al reported that PD-L1 expression was detected in a significantly higher proportion of MpBCs (46%) than in TNBC, not otherwise specified (9%) [20]. Owing to the rarity of MpBCs, no standard treatment has yet been established, although some reports have shown that MpBCs respond remarkably well to ICIs [21–29]. Hence, ICIs may be an attractive treatment option for MpBCs.
Our patient showed an apparently poor response to conventional chemotherapy, as recurrent lesions appeared only a few weeks after the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conversely, administration of pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine/carboplatin as per the KEYNOTE-355 regimen significantly reduced multiple metastases and suppressed disease progression for over 2 years. A few reports have shown that chemoimmunotherapy with pembrolizumab is effective for MpBCs [22,24–26,28,29]. Gul et al were the first to report the achievement of pCR with the KEYNOTE-522 regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage MpBC [24]. Ladwa et al also achieved pCR using the KEYNOTE-522 regimen for early-stage MpBC, with a recurrence-free survival of approximately 18 months [25]. Regarding the combination of palliative chemotherapy and pembrolizumab for advanced-stage MpBC, 2 reports have shown remarkable tumor shrinkage using treatment based on the KEYNOTE-355 regimen [22,26]. In a report by Adams et al, multiple metastases had become undetectable after treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus pembrolizumab, with the tumor response continuing at 6 months [22]. Koi et al showed that the administration of pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine/carboplatin promoted the disappearance of multiple pulmonary metastases [26]. Studies have also reported complete responses lasting for >2 years following chemoimmunotherapy with durvalumab or atezolizumab [21,27]. ICIs can also show remarkable efficacy in metastatic settings, and combination chemotherapy with ICIs could be a powerful option for the treatment of PD-L1-positive MpBCs, similar to that in other types of TNBCs.
Given our patient’s maternal history of ovarian cancer, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome was considered a potential underlying condition. Germline testing for
Discontinuation of ICIs in the absence of disease progression remains controversial. In a real-world analysis of melanoma patients who discontinued anti-PD-1 therapy with pembrolizumab or nivolumab in the absence of disease progression or treatment-limiting toxicity, disease progression was less frequent in patients with complete response (14%) than in those with partial response (32%) and stable disease (50%) [30]. Long-term follow-up data from the initial ICI trials in melanoma indicate that continued ICI administration can cause overtreatment. Pala et al demonstrated that several clinicopathological features, including tumor histology, type of treatment received, and cause of discontinuation, significantly influenced the outcomes of patients who discontinued ICIs for reasons other than disease progression [31]. They showed that the relative risk of progression or death after immunotherapy cessation was 3 and 4 times higher in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma, respectively, than in those with melanoma. Most previous studies regarding ICI discontinuation have focused on melanoma, which has been recognized as one of the most immunogenic tumors [32]. Moreover, ascertaining whether the findings obtained in patients with melanoma can be applied to those with breast cancer remains difficult. Further studies are needed to determine whether ICIs can be discontinued in patients with TNBC, including MpBC, who exhibit long-term responses.
Conclusions
We report a case in which the combination of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was highly effective for early recurrent MpBC. Despite insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of ICIs for MpBC, pembrolizumab combination therapy may be a promising treatment option for patients with MpBCs. Nonetheless, further research is needed to determine the optimal ICI treatment duration in metastatic settings and the appropriateness of discontinuing treatment in patients with long-term response.
Figures
Figure 1. Pretreatment imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging revealing a tumor measuring 5.9×5.8×4.5 cm, with suspected invasion into the pectoralis major muscle.
Figure 2. Pathological findings from the surgical specimen. The metaplastic component consisted mostly of spindle cell carcinoma (A) (hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×200). Carcinoma cells were positive for AE1/AE3 (B), CK5/6 (C), and p63 (D) (×100).
Figure 3. Radiographic imaging upon recurrence. Horizontal computed tomography section showing lung (A) and sternal (B) metastases (red arrows).
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical findings. The initial surgical specimen was PD-L1-positive with a combined positive score of 83.2% (using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx) (×200).
Figure 5. Radiographic imaging. Horizontal computed tomography section showing (A) development of sternal metastasis (left) and multiple lung metastases (middle and right) upon recurrence. (B) One month after receiving pembrolizumab, gemcitabine, and carboplatin, sternal mass (left) and bilateral lung metastases (middle and right) indicating pseudo-progression. (C) Thirty months after chemoimmunotherapy initiation, the metastatic lesions shrank significantly. Lesions are indicated by red arrows.
Figure 6. Timeline of the clinical course. ddEC – dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide; Pembro – pembrolizumab; GEM – gemcitabine; CBDCA – carboplatin. References
1. Pezzi CM, Patel-Parekh L, Cole K, Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: Analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base: Ann Surg Oncol, 2006; 14(1); 166-73
2. Paul Wright G, Davis AT, Koehler TJ, Hormone receptor status does not affect prognosis in metaplastic breast cancer: a population-based analysis with comparison to infiltrating ductal and lobular carcinomas: Ann Surg Oncol, 2014; 21(11); 3497-503
3. Nelson RA, Guye ML, Luu T, Lai LL, Survival outcomes of metaplastic breast cancer patients: Results from a US Population-based analysis: Ann Surg Oncol, 2015; 22(1); 24-31
4. Reis-Filho JS, Milanezi F, Steele D, Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like tumours: Histopathology, 2006; 49(1); 10-21
5. Rakha EA, Coimbra ND, Hodi Z, Immunoprofile of metaplastic carcinomas of the breast: Histopathology, 2017; 70(6); 975-85
6. Hennessy BT, Krishnamurthy S, Giordano S, Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast: J Clin Oncol, 2005; 23(31); 7827-35
7. Hennessy BT, Giordano S, Broglio K, Biphasic metaplastic sarcomatoid carcinoma of the breast: Ann Oncol, 2006; 17(4); 605-13
8. Luini A, Aguilar M, Gatti G, Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast, an unusual disease with worse prognosis: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology and review of the literature: Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2007; 101(3); 349-53
9. Jung SY, Kim HY, Nam BH, Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer: Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2010; 120(3); 627-37
10. Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, Overall survival with pembrolizumab in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: N Engl J Med, 2024; 391(21); 1981-91
11. Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS, Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial: Lancet, 2020; 396(10265); 1817-28
12. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board: Breast Tumours, 2019, Lyon (France), International Agency for Research on Cancer
13. Yamaguchi R, Horii R, Maeda I, Clinicopathologic study of 53 metaplastic breast carcinomas: their elements and prognostic implications: Hum Pathol, 2010; 41(5); 679-85
14. Rakha EA, Tan PH, Varga Z, Prognostic factors in metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: A multi-institutional study: Br J Cancer, 2015; 112(2); 283-89
15. Takala S, Heikkilä P, Nevanlinna H, Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: Prognosis and response to systemic treatment in metastatic disease: Breast J, 2019; 25(3); 418-24
16. Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer: N Engl J Med, 2018; 379(22); 2108-21
17. Emens LA, Adams S, Barrios CH, First-line atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: IMpassion130 final overall survival analysis: Ann Oncol, 2021; 32(8); 983-93
18. Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer: N Engl J Med, 2020; 382(9); 810-21
19. Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, Event-free survival with pembrolizumab in early triple-negative breast cancer: N Engl J Med, 2022; 386(6); 556-67
20. Joneja U, Vranic S, Swensen J, Comprehensive profiling of metaplastic breast carcinomas reveals frequent overexpression of programmed death-ligand 1: J Clin Pathol, 2017; 70(3); 255-59
21. Al Sayed AD, Elshenawy MA, Tulbah A, Complete response of chemo-refractory metastatic metaplastic breast cancer to paclitaxel-immunotherapy combination: Am J Case Rep, 2019; 20; 1630-35
22. Adams S, Dramatic response of metaplastic breast cancer to chemo-immunotherapy: NPJ Breast Cancer, 2017; 3; 8
23. Gorshein E, Matsuda K, Riedlinger G, Durable response to PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in a metastatic, metaplastic breast cancer: Case Rep Oncol, 2021; 14(2); 931-37
24. Gul A, Alberty-Oller JJ, Sandhu J, A Case of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pembrolizumab in metaplastic breast cancer: JCO Precis Oncol, 2023; 7; e2200506
25. Ladwa A, Elghawy O, Schroen A, Complete response of triple-negative metaplastic carcinoma of the breast using pembrolizumab: Case Rep Oncol, 2023; 16(1); 1129-35
26. Koi Y, Tajiri W, Kawasaki J, A dramatic response to an immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy in a patient with metastatic metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: A case report: Thorac Cancer, 2024; 15(28); 2073-76
27. Al-Awadhi A, Alnaqbi S, Albawardi A, Long-lasting complete remission in a patient with metastatic metaplastic breast cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy: A case report and a review of the literature: Cureus, 2024; 16(2); e53419
28. Frezza EG, Nimmagadda GD, Sogunro O, Triple-negative metaplastic breast cancer ameliorated following KEYNOTE-522: A case report: Cureus, 2025; 17(7); e8875
29. Tan Q, Li N, Wang Y, Promising response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in metaplastic breast carcinoma: Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press), 2025; 17; 447-54
30. Jansen YJL, Rozeman EA, Mason R, Discontinuation of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in the absence of disease progression or treatment limiting toxicity: Clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma: Ann Oncol, 2019; 30(7); 1154-61
31. Pala L, Pagan E, Sala I, Outcomes of patients with advanced solid tumors who discontinued immune-checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis: EClinicalMedicine, 2024; 73; 102681
32. Haanen JB, Immunotherapy of melanoma: EJC Suppl, 2013; 11(2); 97-105
Figures
Figure 1. Pretreatment imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging revealing a tumor measuring 5.9×5.8×4.5 cm, with suspected invasion into the pectoralis major muscle.
Figure 2. Pathological findings from the surgical specimen. The metaplastic component consisted mostly of spindle cell carcinoma (A) (hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×200). Carcinoma cells were positive for AE1/AE3 (B), CK5/6 (C), and p63 (D) (×100).
Figure 3. Radiographic imaging upon recurrence. Horizontal computed tomography section showing lung (A) and sternal (B) metastases (red arrows).
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical findings. The initial surgical specimen was PD-L1-positive with a combined positive score of 83.2% (using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx) (×200).
Figure 5. Radiographic imaging. Horizontal computed tomography section showing (A) development of sternal metastasis (left) and multiple lung metastases (middle and right) upon recurrence. (B) One month after receiving pembrolizumab, gemcitabine, and carboplatin, sternal mass (left) and bilateral lung metastases (middle and right) indicating pseudo-progression. (C) Thirty months after chemoimmunotherapy initiation, the metastatic lesions shrank significantly. Lesions are indicated by red arrows.
Figure 6. Timeline of the clinical course. ddEC – dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide; Pembro – pembrolizumab; GEM – gemcitabine; CBDCA – carboplatin. In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






