07 August 2026
: Case report
[In Press] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing as a Rescue Strategy After Failed Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in a Patient With Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava, Absent Coronary Sinus Branches, After Bilateral Maze Procedure: A Case Report
Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Rare disease, Educational Purpose (only if useful for a systematic review or synthesis)
Lucie Kohoutková12ABCDEF, Martin Augustynek1DG, David Šipula2DEFDOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952879
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952879
Available online: 2026-08-07, In Press, Corrected Proof
Publication in the "In-Press" formula aims at speeding up the public availability of the pending manuscript while waiting for the final publication. The assigned DOI number is active and citable. The availability of the article in the Medline, PubMed and PMC databases as well as Web of Science will be obtained after the final publication according to the journal schedule
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Cardiac resynchronization therapy can fail in the presence of anatomical variations, such as persistent left superior vena cava, which can preclude coronary sinus cannulation and left ventricular lead placement. Conduction system pacing, particularly left bundle branch area pacing, has emerged as a physiological alternative for achieving ventricular resynchronization in such anatomically challenging situations and may provide an effective solution when standard cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is not feasible.
CASE REPORT
We report the case of a 78-year-old man with chronic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction 35%) and a history of mitral valve replacement with a bioprosthesis, tricuspid valve repair, and a bilateral Maze procedure. The patient was indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) implantation due to sick sinus syndrome with tachy-brady arrhythmia and left bundle branch block with a QRS duration of 190 ms. Periprocedural venography revealed a persistent left superior vena cava draining into a markedly dilated coronary sinus without suitable lateral branches, preventing left ventricular lead placement. Following device implantation, the patient experienced progressive heart failure deterioration, with a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to 25% and an increase in NT-proBNP to 7741 ng/L, subsequently fulfilling criteria for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. Due to unfavorable venous anatomy, conduction system pacing (CSP) was selected as an alternative strategy. A right-sided implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) system with left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) was successfully implanted, resulting in significant QRS narrowing to 120 ms and excellent pacing parameters. At 2-month follow-up, the patient remained clinically stable (NYHA class II) with improvement in LVEF to 30-35%.
CONCLUSIONS
This case illustrates that LBBAP can provide effective ventricular activation and resynchronization when conventional CS-based CRT is not feasible due to venous anomalies. LBBAP is a safe and effective alternative in patients with PLSVC and unfavorable CS anatomy.
Keywords: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Cardiology; Case Reports; Heart Failure; Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953733
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952819
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952834
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.953320
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
22,763,442
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
177,632
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
121,433
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
66,540
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133






