20 January 2026: Articles
Successful Long-Term Remission in Infantile Acute Leukemia Treated With Chemotherapy and Blinatumomab: A Case Report
Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment
Qiuying He E 1, Bin Zhang A 1, Shuang Li A 1, JiaWei Yang A 1, Liangchun Hao A 1*DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950502
Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e950502
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blinatumomab is a novel targeted therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is currently used to treat patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). There are relatively few reports on the use of blinatumomab in infants after initial diagnosis. We report a case of B-ALL in an infant who was treated with blinatumomab and achieved favorable long-term prognosis, without serious adverse reactions occurring during treatment. This case provides a promising treatment option for infant patients.
CASE REPORT: This report describes the case of an infant who presented with lethargy and skin petechiae. Laboratory analysis revealed markedly elevated white blood cell counts, and a bone marrow examination confirmed the presence of ALL. Previous chemotherapy regimens for infants have often resulted in severe adverse reactions, including sepsis, severe anemia, bleeding, and wasting syndrome. In this case, the treatment plan was amended to incorporate blinatumomab in addition to chemotherapy, which resulted in long-term survival. During treatment, the patient experienced adverse reactions, including fever, infection, and elevated transaminases. Nevertheless, the patient tolerated the drug regimen well, suggesting that it could be a promising therapeutic option for infants with leukemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Blinatumomab has shown promise as a safe and effective treatment for infant leukemia. When administered during the induction phase, it may help induce remission of the disease and reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions, compared with chemotherapy. Using blinatumomab in combination with reduced-intensity chemotherapy during the maintenance phase may help sustain long-term disease remission in infant patients.
Keywords: Infant, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, blinatumomab
Introduction
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) accounts for 80% of childhood leukemias, with the highest incidence occurring between the ages of 3 and 7 years. Diagnosis is based on bone marrow aspiration revealing 20% or more blasts and immature lymphocytes, in conjunction with a complete blood count, immunophenotyping, genetic testing (eg, chromosomal karyotyping, fusion genes), and molecular biology testing (eg, gene mutations). The treatment of pediatric ALL focuses on stratified chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and supportive care. The complete remission rate for pediatric ALL can exceed 95%, and the rate of sustained complete remission beyond 5 years ranges from 65% to 80%. ALL in infants, defined as onset before 12 months of age, is rare, accounting for less than 5% of childhood ALL cases. Approximately 80% of cases exhibit 11q23 chromosomal abnormalities involving the
Case Report
A 10-month-old girl weighing 10 kg was admitted to the hospital with a 1-week history of decreased alertness and 5-day history of generalized petechiae. The highest leukocyte count was 172.2×109/L (reference, 5–12×109/L). The child had hemorrhage manifestations (platelets 49×109/L; reference, 135–350×109/L), anemia (hemoglobin 76 g/L; reference, 120–140 g/L), enlarged liver and spleen, and the presence of immature cells in the peripheral blood, suggesting a diagnosis of leukemia. A bone marrow biopsy was performed, resulting in a diagnosis of ALL-L2 (primitive cells account for 78%; Figure 1). Flow cytometry revealed that 76.17% of the cells were malignant B-lineage primitive cells at the pre-B stage. Test results were negative for 56 fusion genes and the Ph-like gene. Cytogenetic analysis showed a normal female karyotype: 46, XX. The patient was diagnosed with low-risk infantile B-ALL. Informed consent was obtained from a guardian before the start of treatment. Treatment was initiated according to the Chinese Children’s Leukemia Group–ALL 2018 protocol. After diagnosis, the patient underwent 8 cycles of chemotherapy combined with an immune-targeted drug therapy. Blinatumomab was administered every 6 months until the end of the second year. The specific regimen is detailed in Table 1. Blinatumomab was administered after chemotherapy, which had suppressed the immune response; no drug-related adverse reactions, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of grade 2 or higher, occurred during treatment. The patient did experience myelosuppression, abnormal liver function, and fever, all of which improved with symptomatic treatment.
Discussion
In the present case, low-dose chemotherapy administered during induction therapy reduced the leukocyte burden, allowing subsequent treatment with blinatumomab to achieve complete remission. Subsequent bridging chemotherapy was then administered together with intermittent blinatumomab therapy over 3 cycles, maintaining persistent MRD negativity. No significant adverse reactions were observed during treatment. This approach offers a favorable initial treatment option for infants with acute leukemia, reducing complications during the induction phase. The Interfant-99 regimen was the first international collaborative combination-therapy trial to show improved outcomes compared with historical studies; however, despite the use of potent combination chemotherapy, it did not significantly improve the prognosis of infants with
Studies have shown that adding blinatumomab to combination chemotherapy significantly improves disease-free survival in children with newly diagnosed standard-risk B-ALL, including those with standard or high relapse risk. Grade 3 or higher CRS, seizures, and sepsis are infrequent following cycles of blinatumomab treatment. However, in patients at intermediate risk of relapse receiving blinatumomab with chemotherapy, the rates of nonfatal sepsis and catheter-associated infections were significantly higher than in the chemotherapy group [8]. Targeted drug therapy–associated adverse reactions, including CRS and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, were also observed. These toxicities, along with infections, are serious adverse events that can lead to drug discontinuation [9]. CRS is an acute systemic inflammatory syndrome characterized by fever and multiorgan dysfunction mediated by elevated levels of cytokines and other markers of inflammation and is thought to be associated with blinatumomab immunotherapy [10]. Specific symptoms of CRS can manifest as fever, headache, nausea, malaise, syncope, rash, dyspnea, fatigue, weakness, hypotension, elevated alanine aminotransferase levels, elevated aspartate aminotransferase levels, elevated total bilirubin levels, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Manifestations of CRS after receiving immunotherapy can overlap with those of infusion reactions, infection-related symptoms, capillary leakage syndrome, and phagocytic histiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome, which need to be differentiated. Studies have shown that risk factors for CRS include tumor load and the starting dose of blinatumomab administered [11]. Therefore, to prevent or reduce the severity of CRS, prophylactic doses of dexamethasone (5 mg/m2, with a maximum dose of 20 mg) are recommended for children with high tumor load, dose escalation, or dose interruptions of more than 4 hours [12], and for the first dose in the induction phase. A dose-escalation regimen (low dose for the first 7 days, full dose on day 8) or an adjustment of the infusion rate is recommended for the first administration during the induction phase.
In the present case, the child underwent a low-dose chemotherapy of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VCP) or cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cytarabine and dexamethasone (COAD) prior to blinatumomab infusion as a pretreatment. She experienced febrile reactions during the infusion, primarily during the dose-escalation phase. Laboratory testing subsequently showed transient transaminase elevation in blood biochemistry. She developed a respiratory infection during the first infusion. The infectious symptoms improved substantially following gammaglobulin transfusion and subsequent therapeutic management. The child received 28 days of chemotherapy combined with blinatumomab, followed by 14-day blinatumomab treatments administered every 6 months. The child remains in sustained remission. During the treatment period, regular follow-up treatment was given in the form of intrathecal injections to prevent and control central nervous system leukemia. The child is now in continuous remission and is being followed up regularly. As previously described, the case lacked the
Conclusions
We present a case of sustained MRD negativity in an infant with B-ALL following the administration of blinatumomab in combination with chemotherapy. At present, there is insufficient data on infantile ALL to support the conclusion that blinatumomab can replace conventional chemotherapy. However, recent data suggest that blinatumomab can replace intensive treatment regimens for consolidated ALL [14] and recurrent pediatric ALL [15]. The efficacy of targeted immunotherapy in reducing chemotherapy-related toxicity and its capacity to enhance the clearance of MRD have been well documented. In our patient, no genealogical transition occurred. There were no instances of serious infections, organ injuries, or other adverse reactions observed during individualized treatment. The occurrence of tumor lysis and grade 3 or higher CRS were not detected, and the child underwent long-term follow-up monitoring due to persistently negative MRD. This patient underwent chemotherapy prior to targeted therapy, to reduce adverse reactions such as tumor burden and CRS severity. During a 2.5-year follow-up period, no adverse events, including severe infection, neurological symptoms, or allergic reactions, have occurred. The patient is currently growing and developing well and remains under observation. As this is an individual case report, long-term follow-up is required to assess the efficacy of the treatment.
References
1. Fazio G, Bardini M, De Lorenzo P, Recurrent genetic fusions redefine MLL germ line acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants: Blood, 2021; 137(14); 1980-84
2. Pieters R, De Lorenzo P, Ancliffe P, Outcome of infants younger than 1 year with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with the Interfant-06 Protocol: Results from an international phase III randomized study: J Clin Oncol, 2019; 37(25); 2246-56
3. Pulte ED, Vallejo J, Przepiorka D, FDA supplemental approval: Blinatumomab for treatment of relapsed and refractory precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Oncologist, 2018; 23(11); 1366-71
4. Bartram J, Ancliff P, Vora A, How I treat infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Blood, 2025; 145(1); 35-42
5. Litzow MR, Sun Z, Mattison RJ, Blinatumomab for MRD-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: N Engl J Med, 2024; 391(4); 320-33
6. Stutterheim J, van der Sluis IM, de Lorenzo P, Clinical implications of minimal residual disease detection in infants with KMT2A-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on the Interfant-06 Protocol: J Clin Oncol, 2021; 39(6); 652-62 [Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(30):4825]
7. van der Sluis IM, de Lorenzo P, Kotecha RS, Blinatumomab added to chemotherapy in infant lymphoblastic leukemia: N Engl J Med, 2023; 388(17); 1572-81
8. Gupta S, Rau RE, Kairalla JA, Blinatumomab in standard-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children: N Engl J Med, 2025; 392(9); 875-91
9. Locatelli F, Zugmaier G, Rizzari C, Effect of blinatumomab vs chemotherapy on event-free survival among children with high-risk first-relapse B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A randomized clinical trial: JAMA, 2021; 325(9); 843-54
10. Lee DW, Santomasso BD, Locke FL, ASTCT Consensus grading for cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicity associated with immune effector cells: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2019; 25(4); 625-38
11. Frey NV, Porter DL, Cytokine release syndrome with novel therapeutics for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, 2016; 2016(1); 567-72
12. Mocquot P, Mossazadeh Y, Lapierre L, The pharmacology of blinatumomab: state of the art on pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, adverse drug reactions and evaluation in clinical trials: J Clin Pharm Ther, 2022; 47(9); 1337-51
13. Boer JM, Valsecchi MG, Hormann FM, Favorable outcome of NUTM1-rearranged infant and pediatric B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a collaborative international study: Leukemia, 2021; 35(10); 2978-82
14. Hodder A, Mishra AK, Enshaei A, Blinatumomab for first-line treatment of children and young persons with B-ALL: J Clin Oncol, 2024; 42(8); 907-14 [Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(27):3262]
15. Brown PA, Ji L, Xu X, Effect of postreinduction therapy consolidation with blinatumomab vs chemotherapy on disease-free survival in children, adolescents, and young adults with first relapse of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A randomized clinical trial: JAMA, 2021; 325(9); 833-42
In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133








