Logo American Journal of Case Reports

Call: 1.631.629.4328
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports Logo American Journal of Case Reports

12 May 2026: Articles  China

Sleeve Resection of the Right Upper Lobe for Tracheobronchial Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Superior Vena Cava Involvement: A Case Report and Literature Review

Challenging differential diagnosis, Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment, Rare disease

Peng Cao ABEF 1,2, Yulin Wang BCDF 1,3, Qing Wang ABCD 1, Wei Cai ABE 1,4, Rui Zhang ORCID logo DG 2, Zhigang Li ABCDG 1*, Junfeng Geng ABCDEFG 1

DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952125

Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e952125

0 Comments

Abstract

0:00

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) most commonly metastasizes to the lungs, but endobronchial metastasis is an exceedingly rare manifestation associated with a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is seldom considered, with only 2 previously reported cases. This case is presented to highlight the diagnostic challenges of endobronchial metastasis and to report the novel use of an anatomic lung-preserving sleeve resection for definitive treatment, an approach not previously described for this condition.

CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old man with a history of hepatitis B virus infection and prior right hepatectomy for HCC (pT2N0M0, CNLC Ib) presented with a 5-month history of hemoptysis 43 months after the initial liver surgery. Chest computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT identified a right hilar mass. Two preoperative bronchoscopies with immunohistochemical staining (TTF-1, Napsin A, GPC3, Arg-1) were inconclusive, suggesting a poorly differentiated non-small cell carcinoma. Following disease progression on 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, the patient proceeded to multidisciplinary team-recommended surgery 4 weeks after the final cycle. The patient successfully underwent a uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, during which a right upper lobe sleeve resection was performed, accompanied by resection and repair of the superior vena cava wall. Final histopathology confirmed metastatic HCC. The patient's postoperative recovery was uneventful, with complete resolution of symptoms, and no recurrence was observed during the 3-month postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores that endobronchial metastasis from HCC can pose a significant diagnostic dilemma, often requiring surgical resection for definitive diagnosis. It demonstrates that sleeve resection is a technically feasible and oncologically sound option for solitary endobronchial metastasis, achieving complete tumor removal while preserving lung function. This approach should be considered in carefully selected patients with controlled primary disease and good status. The decision-making process emphasizes the critical role of a multidisciplinary team in managing complex metastatic HCC.

Keywords: Bronchial Neoplasms, Case Reports, hepatocellular carcinoma, metastasis, Superior Vena Cava Syndrome, Thoracic Surgery

Introduction

The lungs are the most common site of metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, endobronchial metastasis is relatively rare in HCC compared with other malignancies [1]. Previous studies suggest that HCC with endobronchial metastasis is associated with a poor prognosis, and current treatment strategies are largely confined to systemic therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy [2,3]. To date [4,5], only 2 cases have been reported to undergo surgical resection – one treated with right upper lobectomy and the other with pneumonectomy. Here, we present a case in which 2 preoperative bronchoscopic examinations failed to conclusively determine the origin of the endobronchial tumor. Despite neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, the disease continued to progress. The patient subsequently underwent sleeve resection of the right upper lobe, which successfully achieved complete removal of the solitary metastatic lesion while preserving pulmonary function. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of sleeve resection performed for histologically confirmed endobronchial metastasis from HCC.

Case Report

A 62-year-old man presented with a 5-month history of intermittent bloody sputum. He had a 40-pack-year smoking history and a medical background of hepatitis B virus infection. In September 2021, a hepatic tumor measuring 9.6×7.6 cm, located in segment VI of the right liver lobe, was identified during evaluation for abdominal pain. Preoperative serum tumor marker evaluation revealed elevated levels of alpha fetoprotein (AFP) at 320 ng/mL and prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) at 80 mAU/mL. The patient subsequently underwent radical right hepatectomy. Postoperative pathology confirmed HCC, classified as pT2N0M0 (China Liver Cancer Staging CNLC Ib). Given the postoperative pathology indicating pT2 stage large HCC with a high risk of recurrence, the patient underwent prophylactic/adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) following multidisciplinary discussion, aiming to reduce the recurrence rate. In June 2022, a chest CT scan detected a 6-mm solid nodule in the right upper lobe. By October 2022, follow-up imaging showed enlargement to 11 mm, suggestive of metastatic disease, which led to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Subsequent surveillance indicated gradual resolution of the treated lesion.

In January 2025, the patient developed cough and hemoptysis that persisted despite antibiotic treatment. In March 2025, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) revealed a hypermetabolic fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid mass (3.1×2.8 cm), with a standardized uptake value-maximum (SUVmax) of 10.3, in the right hilum, with imaging features highly consistent with malignancy (Figure 1A). Tumor markers, including AFP, CEA, NSE, CYFRA21-1, and PIVKA-II, were within normal ranges, while TSGF was elevated (74.96 U/mL). Bronchoscopy showed complete neoplastic obstruction of the right upper lobe bronchus (Figure 1B). The initial biopsy was non-diagnostic; however, a repeat bronchoscopy with immunohistochemical staining yielded the following profile: TTF-1(−), CK7(−), Napsin A(−), P40(−), Ki-67 (approximately 50%+), SMARCA4(+), GPC-3(−), Hep(−), and Arg-1(−). Expert pathology consultation suggested poorly differentiated non-small cell carcinoma.

The patient’s regimen was selected based on institutional experience and guidelines for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, as the tumor origin was still uncertain at that time. He received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy consisting of tislelizumab (200 mg), polymeric micellar paclitaxel (360 mg), and carboplatin (0.5 g). A contrast-enhanced chest CT in June 2025 demonstrated disease progression, with the hilar mass enlarging to 6.1 cm (Figure 1C). Multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment identified: (1) right upper hilar non-small cell carcinoma (primary vs metastatic); and (2) abdominal wall nodule (suspected metastasis).

Based on the MDT recommendation and after thorough discussion of the risks and benefits, the patient provided informed consent for surgery. Preoperative assessment revealed a Child-Pugh class A liver function with contrast-enhanced imaging confirming no evidence of HCC recurrence in the liver. Pulmonary function tests [Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 2.8 L, 92% predicted; Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) of 3.5 L] and normal cardiac function were also documented, confirming his physiological tolerance for major thoracic surgery.

Port placement: A single 4-cm incision was made at the right fifth intercostal space along the midaxillary line. Intraoperative technical challenges included the fact that the tumor exhibited extensive adhesions to the hilar vessels, complicating dissection and increasing the risk of bleeding (Figure 1D). The estimated intraoperative blood loss was 400–800 mL, and 4 units of packed red blood cells had been prepared preoperatively. Frozen section analysis of the abdominal wall showed that the nodule was benign. The procedure performed included right upper lobectomy with bronchial sleeve resection, resection and direct repair of the lateral wall of the superior vena cava (SVC), and systematic lymphadenectomy (22 nodes retrieved). The tumor showed transmural invasion of the bronchial wall. No lymphovascular or perineural invasion was identified. The bronchial and vascular margins were free of tumor, with a distance of greater than 5 mm from the nearest invasive component, confirming an R0 resection.

Final histopathology confirmed metastatic HCC with involvement of stations 7 and 11, supported by its immunohistochemical profile: positive for creatine kinase (focal), SMARCA4, CD56 (rare), Arg-1 (rare), and GPC3 (rare); negative for NUT, P40, TTF-1, Napsin A, HEP-1, and AFP; Ki-67 was 40%. The patient’s postoperative recovery was uneventful. At the 3-month follow-up, a chest CT scan showed no evidence of recurrence, and the patient remained asymptomatic with complete resolution of hemoptysis.

Discussion

The lungs represent a common site of metastatic disease from various extrapulmonary malignancies. It is estimated that 20–50% of patients with solid tumors outside the thorax will develop pulmonary metastases during the course of their disease [6]. Among endobronchial biopsies performed for suspected malignancy, approximately 4% reveal endobronchial metastasis from an extrapulmonary primary tumor. The most frequent sources of such metastases include breast cancer (30%), colorectal cancer (24%), renal cell carcinoma (14%), gastric cancer (6%), melanoma (4.5%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (2%) [6]. Thus, endobronchial metastasis from HCC remains a very rare clinical entity.

A systematic review of the English-language literature available on PubMed from 1988 to 2025 identified only 15 reported cases of endobronchial metastasis from HCC (Table 1), [2–5,7–17]. Notably, half of these cases were reported within the last decade, suggesting that improvements in diagnostic techniques may have contributed to increased detection over time. The most common clinical manifestations of endobronchial metastasis included hemoptysis (56.2%) and cough (43.7%). Anatomically, the right lung was more frequently involved (62.5%), with a predilection for the right main bronchus and the upper lobe. The clinical presentation in our case – hemoptysis and cough with a right upper lobe endobronchial lesion – aligns well with these previously reported characteristics.

Based on the table data, systemic medical therapy is the primary approach. Only 2 cases of surgical resection for endobronchial metastasis of HCC have been documented in the literature, one treated with right upper lobectomy (Lee et al, 2003) and the other with pneumonectomy (Purandare et al, 2009) [4,5]. In contrast, the present case, to our knowledge, is the first to utilize a right upper lobe sleeve resection, which was performed via a uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach. This technique was selected to achieve complete tumor removal while maximizing the preservation of functional lung tissue.

HCC is the most common form of primary liver cancer. Although surgical resection offers the best opportunity for long-term survival, postoperative 5-year survival remains modest, at approximately 40–50% [18]. High mortality is largely attributable to disease recurrence, which occurs in nearly 70% of patients, with the lungs being a frequent site of metastasis [19]. Therefore, the management of metastatic HCC – particularly in unusual presentations such as endobronchial metastasis – requires individualized and multidisciplinary approaches.

Bronchoscopy represents a critical procedure for the diagnosis of endobronchial tumors, with immunohistochemistry and histopathological description serving as an essential ancillary diagnostic tool [20] (Figure 2). Key markers play a fundamental role in distinguishing primary bronchogenic lung cancer from endobronchial metastasis of HCC. Among these, TTF-1 and Napsin A are highly specific for primary lung adenocarcinoma when both show positive immunostaining. Cytokeratin profiles, such as CK7 positivity combined with CK20 negativity, may also provide valuable diagnostic information [21,22]. Conversely, markers indicative of hepatocellular origin include HepPar-1, Arg-1, GPC3, and AFP (Figure 3). Furthermore, emerging biomarkers – such as circulating tumor cells, proteins, nucleic acids, and exosomes – show potential for detecting HCC metastasis, monitoring immune evasion, and predicting prognosis [23,24].

In the present case, the immunohistochemical profile demonstrated TTF-1 (−), Napsin A (−), Arg-1 (focal +), and GPC3 (focal +). Integrated with morphological assessment and the patient’s history of HCC, these findings confirmed the diagnosis of endobronchial metastasis from HCC. This case underscores the importance of sufficient tissue sampling, a comprehensive immunohistochemistry marker panel, and the integration of histopathological and clinical data for achieving a definitive diagnosis.

Wang et al [25] conducted a multicenter retrospective study involving 2705 HCC patients who underwent radical hepatectomy. The prognosis of HCC with distant metastasis was notably poor, with a median overall survival (OS) ranging from only 4.9 to 10.3 months. Within the cohort, 1507 patients (55.7%) experienced recurrence, including 342 cases (22.7%) who developed distant metastases. The most common sites of metastasis included extrahepatic vasculature (36.2%), lungs (26.0%), and lymph nodes (20.8%). Patients with distant metastasis exhibited significantly inferior 5-year OS compared with those with intrahepatic recurrence only (9.1% vs 41.1%, P<0.001). Notably, pulmonary metastasis was associated with particularly dismal outcomes; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data indicated a median OS of 3 months in these patients, compared with 19 months in those without lung involvement [26].

In the present case, the primary hepatic tumor measured 9.6 cm, suggesting high metastatic risk. A suspected – though unconfirmed – pulmonary metastasis was identified 9 months after surgery, with endobronchial metastasis confirmed at 43 months. RFA is an established local treatment modality for pulmonary oligometastases, offering a minimally invasive approach for tumor control [27]. In this patient, despite RFA treatment for the peripheral pulmonary lesion, subsequent endobronchial metastasis emerged, raising the possibility of iatrogenic airway seeding following RFA – a recognized, albeit rare, complication of transthoracic ablation procedures. Reported incidences of needle tract seeding after lung RFA range from approximately 0.3% to 0.7% [28,29]. This mechanism could plausibly explain the pathogenesis observed in the present case.

The failure of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in this case may be attributed to the intrinsic heterogeneity of metastatic HCC and its known resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Studies have shown that endobronchial metastasis from HCC often exhibits a poor response to systemic therapy, as evidenced by cases of disease progression even following immunotherapy [3], making local interventions like surgery crucial in selected patients [2].

In light of these limitations of systemic therapy, a growing body of evidence underscores the role of surgical resection as a viable and potentially curative option for well-selected patients. Hu et al investigated the therapeutic role and selection criteria for pulmonary metastasectomy (PMT) in HCC patients with pulmonary metastasis after liver resection. Their study identified several independent prognostic factors, including the stage of the primary intrahepatic tumor, status of pulmonary metastases, control of the primary tumor, and patient performance status or liver function [30]. In another study, Kim et al analyzed 63 patients who underwent PMT for pulmonary metastatic HCC between 2004 and 2022, reporting cumulative post-PMT survival rates of 79.1%, 63.9%, and 35.6% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. These outcomes suggest that PMT can yield acceptable survival in patients with unilateral resectable metastases and adequate surgical margins [31].

Sleeve lobectomy has been established as a parenchyma-sparing alternative to pneumonectomy for centrally located lung tumors, providing comparable long-term survival while minimizing functional loss. By preserving functional lung tissue, it is associated with significantly better postoperative pulmonary function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life compared with pneumonectomy [32]. Use of a minimally invasive approach (VATS and/or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) to sleeve lobectomy further enhances recovery, demonstrating reduced blood loss, shorter drainage duration, and lower complication rates while maintaining equivalent oncological outcomes to open procedures [33]. This combination of lung preservation and minimal invasiveness establishes a superior physiological foundation for rapid recovery, making sleeve lobectomy the preferred approach when technically feasible [32,33].

Based on these findings and International Guidelines and Consensus, the management of pulmonary metastases necessitates a comprehensive evaluation by an MDT to formulate individualized treatment strategies. The primary goal is to achieve long-term survival or even cure through aggressive local therapy in carefully selected patients, provided that the primary tumor is controlled and systemic disease is effectively managed [34,35]. The MDT at our institution established the following selection criteria for surgical intervention in endobronchial metastasis:

The initial treatment was administered for suspected advanced non-small cell lung cancer based on inconclusive bronchoscopic biopsy immunohistochemistry results (TTF-1, Napsin A negative; GPC3, Arg-1 focally positive). Upon disease progression during that treatment, and given the solitary endobronchial lesion, absence of intrahepatic or other distant metastases, and good performance status (PS 0–1), the MDT considered radical local therapy (surgery) as the best option with potential for long-term benefit to control this systemic therapy-resistant isolated metastasis. This aligns with the principle of aggressive local treatment for oligometastatic disease, which is supported by expert consensus emphasizing the value of surgical resection when the primary tumor is controlled, metastases are resectable, and the patient is medically operable [35]. Following this comprehensive MDT evaluation and thorough informed consent, surgical resection was pursued as a feasible and potentially curative treatment option for this carefully selected patient. Building upon the inherent benefits of the parenchyma-sparing sleeve technique, the minimally invasive VATS approach was employed to further optimize perioperative outcomes and enhance clinical recovery.

This study has several limitations. First, it is a single-case report, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Second, the lack of long-term follow-up data precludes conclusions about overall long-term survival, which is particularly relevant given the high recurrence risk of HCC. Finally, the role of sleeve resection in patients with multiple endobronchial metastases or uncontrolled primary disease remains unclear and requires further investigation.

Conclusions

This case confirms the diagnostic and therapeutic viability of sleeve resection for endobronchial tumors within an MDT framework. In conclusion, sleeve resection should be considered a viable option in carefully selected patients with solitary endobronchial metastasis from HCC, controlled primary disease, good performance status, and progression after systemic therapy. More broadly, it highlights surgery as a crucial modality for such patients, underscoring the MDT’s indispensable role in balancing radical disease control with organ preservation. As a single-institution experience, however, these findings necessitate validation through larger, multicenter studies with extended follow-up to firmly establish the long-term efficacy and safety of this approach.

Figures

Preoperative evaluation and intraoperative findings of a patient with endobronchial metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) March 2025 PET-CT Findings: Right hilar mass, dimensions: 3.1×2.8 cm; FDG-avid lesion (SUVmax 10.3), obstructive pneumonitis in right upper lobe. The highlighted hyperintense regions (orange) demonstrate the tumor. (B) Bronchoscopy identified complete tumor occlusion at the right upper lobe bronchus ostium. (C) June 2025 follow-up imaging: contrast-enhanced chest CT demonstrated progressive disease with interval enlargement of the right hilar mass to 6.1 cm maximal diameter (3 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy initiation). (D) Green solid line: outlines the anatomical contour of the SVC, clearly illustrating its relationship to the tumor. The red circle indicates the most prominent site of SVC invasion by the tumor, representing a critical surgical challenge for vascular dissection and preservation. Black dashed line: denotes the pericardial incision, exposing the intrapericardial root of the SVC. Yellow contour: highlights the use of a suction device to retract the SVC, revealing the underlying main trunk of the right pulmonary artery and demonstrating the difficulty in dissecting the proximal pulmonary artery. PET – positron emission tomography; CT – computed tomography; FDG – fluorodeoxyglucose; SUVmax – standardized uptake value-maximum; SVC – superior vena cava.Figure 1. Preoperative evaluation and intraoperative findings of a patient with endobronchial metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) March 2025 PET-CT Findings: Right hilar mass, dimensions: 3.1×2.8 cm; FDG-avid lesion (SUVmax 10.3), obstructive pneumonitis in right upper lobe. The highlighted hyperintense regions (orange) demonstrate the tumor. (B) Bronchoscopy identified complete tumor occlusion at the right upper lobe bronchus ostium. (C) June 2025 follow-up imaging: contrast-enhanced chest CT demonstrated progressive disease with interval enlargement of the right hilar mass to 6.1 cm maximal diameter (3 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy initiation). (D) Green solid line: outlines the anatomical contour of the SVC, clearly illustrating its relationship to the tumor. The red circle indicates the most prominent site of SVC invasion by the tumor, representing a critical surgical challenge for vascular dissection and preservation. Black dashed line: denotes the pericardial incision, exposing the intrapericardial root of the SVC. Yellow contour: highlights the use of a suction device to retract the SVC, revealing the underlying main trunk of the right pulmonary artery and demonstrating the difficulty in dissecting the proximal pulmonary artery. PET – positron emission tomography; CT – computed tomography; FDG – fluorodeoxyglucose; SUVmax – standardized uptake value-maximum; SVC – superior vena cava. Histopathological examination of the endobronchial mass. (A) H&E low-power magnification revealing neoplasm with necrosis, fibrosis, and inflammatory response. (B) H&E medium-power magnification showing a trabecular pattern with abundant sinusoids. (C) H&E medium-power magnification showing a complex glandular pattern. (D) H&E high power magnification showing neoplasm cells with clear cytoplasm and prominent single nucleoli. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.Figure 2. Histopathological examination of the endobronchial mass. (A) H&E low-power magnification revealing neoplasm with necrosis, fibrosis, and inflammatory response. (B) H&E medium-power magnification showing a trabecular pattern with abundant sinusoids. (C) H&E medium-power magnification showing a complex glandular pattern. (D) H&E high power magnification showing neoplasm cells with clear cytoplasm and prominent single nucleoli. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin. Representative immunohistochemical staining profiles of the endobronchial metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) GPC3 medium-power magnification positive. (B) Arg-1 medium-power magnification positive. (C) AFP medium-power magnification weakly positive. (D) TTF-1 medium-power magnification negative. GPC3 – glypican 3; Arg-1 – arginase-1; AFP – alpha fetoprotein; TTF-1 – thyroid transcription factor 1.Figure 3. Representative immunohistochemical staining profiles of the endobronchial metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) GPC3 medium-power magnification positive. (B) Arg-1 medium-power magnification positive. (C) AFP medium-power magnification weakly positive. (D) TTF-1 medium-power magnification negative. GPC3 – glypican 3; Arg-1 – arginase-1; AFP – alpha fetoprotein; TTF-1 – thyroid transcription factor 1.

References

1. Ikezoe J, Johkoh T, Takeuchi N, CT findings of endobronchial metastasis: Acta Radiol, 1991; 32(5); 455-60

2. Szumera-Cieckiewicz A, Olszewski WT, Piech K, Endobronchial metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma: A case description with literature review: Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2013; 6(9); 1942-47

3. Cheung FP, Russell PA, Alam NZ, Wright GM, Endobronchial metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report: Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 2019; 27(8); 703-6

4. Lee KY, Ryu SJ, Endobronchial metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Yonsei Med J, 2003; 44; 544-47

5. Purandare NC, Pramesh CS, Rangarajan V, Hepatocellular carcinoma recurring as isolated endobronchial metastasis 8 years after primary surgery: J Thorac Imaging, 2009; 24; 147-49

6. Marchioni A, Lasagni A, Busca A, Endobronchial metastasis: An epidemiologic and clinicopathologic study of 174 consecutive cases: Lung Cancer, 2014; 84; 222-28

7. Camps C, Soler JJ, Juan G, An unusual form of metastasis of hepatocarcinoma: endobronchial metastasis: Rev Esp Enferm Dig, 1988; 74(2); 155-57

8. Murayama J, Naitoh T, Doi M, A case of small liver cancer presenting as a huge mediastinal mass: Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi, 1992; 30; 708-13

9. Salud A, Porcel JM, Rovirosa A, Bellmunt J, Endobronchial metastatic disease: Analysis of 32 cases: J Surg Oncol, 1996; 62; 249-52

10. Kido T, Iwanaga T, Takata S, A case of solitary endobronchial metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi, 2005; 43; 422-26

11. Uchida R, Masugi Y, Nishizawa T, Extensive endobronchial growth of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma resulting in respiratory failure: A case report: Pathol Res Pract, 2010; 206; 116-20

12. Dong A, Zhao T, Wang Y, Zuo C, FDG PET/CT in endobronchial metastases from extrathoracic malignancies: Clin Nucl Med, 2014; 39; 446-49

13. El-Badrawy A, Gadelhak B, El-Badrawy MK, Hepatocellular carcinoma with endobronchial metastasis: A case report: J Hepatocell Carcinoma, 2018; 2; 1-5

14. Cai Y, Ju S, Endobronchial growth of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma 15 years after surgery: A case report: Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2020; 10; 874-75

15. Zhang J, Dong A, Wang Y, Hot gloved finger sign in endobronchial metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma on FDG PET/CT: Clin Nucl Med, 2023; 48; 81-82

16. Koay L, Lee HY, Xu H, Phua CK, Bilateral endobronchial metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A case report with literature review: Respirol Case Rep, 2023; 11; e01186

17. Takei S, Yoshimura A, Yamamoto C, Endobronchial metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib: A case report: Respirol Case Rep, 2023; 11; e01208

18. Wang Z, Qin H, Liu S, Precision diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Chin Med J (Engl), 2023; 136; 1155-65

19. Ge Y, Mu W, Ba Q, Hepatocellular carcinoma-derived exosomes in organotropic metastasis, recurrence and early diagnosis application: Cancer Lett, 2020; 477; 41-48

20. Kiryu T, Hoshi H, Matsui E, Endotracheal/endobronchial metastases: Clinicopathologic study with special reference to developmental modes: Chest, 2001; 119; 768-75

21. Ye J, Findeis-Hosey JJ, Yang Q, Combination of napsin A and TTF-1 immunohistochemistry helps in differentiating primary lung adenocarcinoma from metastatic carcinoma in the lung: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol, 2011; 19; 313-17

22. Kummar S, Fogarasi M, Canova A, Cytokeratin 7 and 20 staining for the diagnosis of lung and colorectal adenocarcinoma: Br J Cancer, 2002; 86; 1884-87

23. Draganova-Tacheva R, Solomides C, Arginase-1 and HepPar-1 expression in fine-needle aspiration specimens of primary lung adenocarcinoma: J Am Soc Cytopathol, 2015; 4; 137-40

24. Schlosser S, Tümen D, Volz B, HCC biomarkers – state of the old and outlook to future promising biomarkers and their potential in everyday clinical practice: Front Oncol, 2022; 12; 1016952

25. Wang MD, Lv SD, Diao YK, Risk stratification model for predicting distant metastasis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-institutional analysis: Biosci Trends, 2025; 19(2); 211-20

26. Wu C, Ren X, Zhang Q, Incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma and lung metastasis: A population-based study: Cancer Manag Res, 2019; 11; 2759-68

27. Palussière J, Catena V, Buy X, Percutaneous thermal ablation of lung tumors – Radiofrequency, microwave and cryotherapy: Where are we going?: Diagn Interv Imaging, 2017; 98(9); 619-25

28. Hiraki T, Gobara H, Fujiwara H, Lung cancer ablation: Complications: Semin Intervent Radiol, 2013; 30(2); 169-75

29. Lassandro G, Picchi SG, Corvino A, Ablation of pulmonary neoplasms: Review of literature and future perspectives: Pol J Radiol, 2023; 88; e216-e24

30. Hu Z, Li W, Huang P, Therapeutic significance and indications of pulmonary metastasectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma following liver resection: Int J Surg, 2017; 48; 23-31

31. Kim B, Moon MH, Moon SW, Prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy for oligometastatic hepatocellular carcinoma spread to the lungs: J Clin Med, 2024; 13; 4241

32. De Leyn P, Rots W, Deneffe G, Sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: Acta Chir Belg, 2003; 103(6); 570-76

33. Chen T, Zhao W, Ji C, Minimally invasive sleeve lobectomy for centrally located lung cancer: A real-world study with propensity-score matching: Front Oncol, 2023; 13; 1099514

34. Pastorino U, Buyse M, Friedel G, Long-term results of lung metastasectomy: Prognostic analyses based on 5206 cases: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1997; 113(1); 37-49

35. Handy JR, Bremner RM, Crocenzi TS, Expert consensus document on pulmonary metastasectomy: Ann Thorac Surg, 2019; 107(2); 631-49

Figures

Figure 1. Preoperative evaluation and intraoperative findings of a patient with endobronchial metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) March 2025 PET-CT Findings: Right hilar mass, dimensions: 3.1×2.8 cm; FDG-avid lesion (SUVmax 10.3), obstructive pneumonitis in right upper lobe. The highlighted hyperintense regions (orange) demonstrate the tumor. (B) Bronchoscopy identified complete tumor occlusion at the right upper lobe bronchus ostium. (C) June 2025 follow-up imaging: contrast-enhanced chest CT demonstrated progressive disease with interval enlargement of the right hilar mass to 6.1 cm maximal diameter (3 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy initiation). (D) Green solid line: outlines the anatomical contour of the SVC, clearly illustrating its relationship to the tumor. The red circle indicates the most prominent site of SVC invasion by the tumor, representing a critical surgical challenge for vascular dissection and preservation. Black dashed line: denotes the pericardial incision, exposing the intrapericardial root of the SVC. Yellow contour: highlights the use of a suction device to retract the SVC, revealing the underlying main trunk of the right pulmonary artery and demonstrating the difficulty in dissecting the proximal pulmonary artery. PET – positron emission tomography; CT – computed tomography; FDG – fluorodeoxyglucose; SUVmax – standardized uptake value-maximum; SVC – superior vena cava.Figure 2. Histopathological examination of the endobronchial mass. (A) H&E low-power magnification revealing neoplasm with necrosis, fibrosis, and inflammatory response. (B) H&E medium-power magnification showing a trabecular pattern with abundant sinusoids. (C) H&E medium-power magnification showing a complex glandular pattern. (D) H&E high power magnification showing neoplasm cells with clear cytoplasm and prominent single nucleoli. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.Figure 3. Representative immunohistochemical staining profiles of the endobronchial metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) GPC3 medium-power magnification positive. (B) Arg-1 medium-power magnification positive. (C) AFP medium-power magnification weakly positive. (D) TTF-1 medium-power magnification negative. GPC3 – glypican 3; Arg-1 – arginase-1; AFP – alpha fetoprotein; TTF-1 – thyroid transcription factor 1.

In Press

Case report  China

Thrombolytic Therapy After Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients With STEMI From Medically Underdev...

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976  

Case report  Greece

Multilevel Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Low Back Pain in Achondroplasia: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290  

Case report  Italy

Fractional CO₂ Laser (SCAR3 Scanner) for a Hypertrophic Retracting Cleft Lip Scar: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607  

Case report  Saudi Arabia

Postoperative Corneal Dellen Following PreserFlo MicroShunt: A Case Report

Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985  

Most Viewed Current Articles

07 Dec 2021 : Case report  USA 17,691,734

Edwardsiella tarda: A Classic Presentation of a Rare Fatal Infection, with Possible New Background Risk Fac...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347

06 Dec 2021 : Case report  Brazil 164,491

Lipedema Can Be Treated Non-Surgically: A Report of 5 Cases

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406

Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406

21 Jun 2024 : Case report  China (mainland) 113,090

Intracranial Parasitic Fetus in a Living Infant: A Case Study with Surgical Intervention and Prognosis Anal...

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371

0:00

07 Mar 2024 : Case report  USA 59,175

Neurocysticercosis Presenting as Migraine in the United States

DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133

Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923
American Journal of Case Reports eISSN: 1941-5923