15 May 2026: Articles
A 56-Year-Old Woman With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Prophylaxis Presenting With Breakthrough Nocardiosis
Unusual clinical course, Challenging differential diagnosis, Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment
Ming Lu BCE 1,2, Jingwen Zhang BCF 3,4, Ying Liu CD 5, Feng Nie BC 6,4, Tianyu Zou BC 1,4, Haijun Li CD 7, Ping Li ABEG 1,2*, Tianxin Xiang ABEF 2,6DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.952006
Am J Case Rep 2026; 27:e952006
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with primary or secondary immunosuppression can be treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) as long-term prophylaxis to prevent opportunistic infections. Nocardia africana/nova is an aerobic, gram-positive opportunistic organism. This case report describes a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on low-dose TMP-SMX prophylaxis who developed nocardiosis due to N. africana/nova.
CASE REPORT: A 56-year-old Chinese woman with SLE on long-term low-dose TMP-SMX prophylaxis underwent partial right lung lobectomy in July 2023 after incidental pulmonary lesions were detected. Pathology revealed a cryptococcal granuloma, which was treated with fluconazole. In November 2024, chest computed tomography (CT) showed progressive pulmonary nodules and right upper lobe consolidation despite antibacterial and antifungal therapy, including voriconazole guided by next-generation sequencing. CT-guided lung biopsy confirmed pulmonary nocardiosis caused by N. africana/nova, susceptible in vitro to TMP-SMX. High-dose TMP-SMX plus linezolid led to radiologic improvement, after which TMP-SMX monotherapy was continued. In March 2025, she was readmitted with acute altered mental status, recurrent cavitary pulmonary disease, pleural effusion, and multiple ring-enhancing cerebral abscesses, consistent with disseminated nocardiosis. Further aggressive treatment was declined, and she was discharged for palliative care.
CONCLUSIONS: Nocardiosis is challenging to diagnose and treat in immunocompromised patients, as breakthrough infections can occur despite in vitro susceptibility, reflecting the roles of host immunity and drug factors. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for nocardiosis in patients receiving corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive therapies and recognize that in vitro susceptibility does not always predict in vivo therapeutic success. This report highlights that breakthrough nocardia can occur with appropriate low-dose TMP-SMX prophylaxis.
Keywords: Nocardia, Immunocompromised Host, Case Reports, Trimethoprim
Introduction
Immunocompromised individuals are at increased risk for a variety of health complications [1], among which opportunistic infections are a leading cause of morbidity [2,3]. This population includes organ transplant recipients, individuals receiving long-term immunosuppressive therapy, and those with HIV infection or hematologic malignancies [3,4]. Current guidelines, including those of the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommendations for adults and adolescents with HIV [5,6] and the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice guidelines [7], recommend trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) as the preferred prophylactic agent for
Nocardiosis, caused by aerobic actinomycetes of the genus
Pulmonary nocardiosis often presents with nonspecific clinical and radiographic features that can mimic tuberculosis, malignancy, or fungal infection, complicating early diagnosis [15]. CNS involvement, in particular, carries a poor prognosis even with appropriate antimicrobial therapy [16]. TMP-SMX has long been regarded as the cornerstone for both the prophylaxis and treatment of nocardiosis [17]. Nevertheless, breakthrough infections have increasingly been reported in patients receiving low-dose prophylaxis [18,19]. Contributing factors may include subtherapeutic serum drug concentrations, species-specific differences in virulence and antimicrobial susceptibility, and impaired host immunity [18,19].
Here, we report a case of a 56-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who developed disseminated
Case Report
A 56-year-old Chinese woman received a diagnosis of SLE in 2021, based on malar rash, arthralgia, positive anti–double-stranded DNA antibodies, and decreased complement levels. Since diagnosis, she had been maintained on long-term infection prophylaxis with oral TMP-SMX (1 tablet daily), along with prednisone (15 mg daily), hydroxychloroquine (200 mg twice daily), and esomeprazole (40 mg daily). During routine follow-up, chest computed tomography (CT) revealed incidental pulmonary opacities, although the patient remained asymptomatic. A calcified nodule was also noted in the right thyroid gland. In July 2023, she underwent extended radical thyroidectomy and partial right lung lobectomy, which confirmed right-sided thyroid carcinoma. Histopathology of the resected lung tissue revealed a cryptococcal granuloma, and she subsequently completed a 3-month course of fluconazole (400 mg daily).
In November 2024, follow-up CT demonstrated a newly developed dense consolidation in the right upper lobe (Figure 1). Empirical intravenous ceftazidime (2 g twice daily) was initiated, and fluconazole (400 mg daily) was continued. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage was performed, and next-generation sequencing of the lavage fluid identified
Considering her history of long-term low-dose TMP-SMX prophylaxis and the TMP-SMX susceptibility of the isolate, a breakthrough
In March 2025, the patient was readmitted with acute confusion and altered mental status. Chest CT revealed relapse of pulmonary infection with cavitary lesions and pleural effusion (Figure 8). Brain magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated multiple ring-enhancing cerebral abscesses, consistent with disseminated nocardiosis (Figure 9). Admission to the intensive care unit was recommended; however, the patient’s family declined further aggressive interventions due to financial constraints, and she was discharged home for palliative care.
Discussion
This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of nocardiosis in immunocompromised hosts and underscores that breakthrough
Nocardiosis is an uncommon but serious opportunistic infection, predominantly affecting individuals with impaired cell-mediated immunity [13,17]. Established risk factors include long-term corticosteroid exposure, autoimmune disease, and solid organ or hematologic malignancy [12,20]. In patients with SLE, both the underlying immune dysregulation and prolonged immunosuppressive therapy contribute to increased
TMP-SMX has long been considered the cornerstone of both the prophylaxis and treatment for nocardiosis [17,24]. Among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, multiple studies have consistently suggested that TMP-SMX prophylaxis is associated with a lower incidence of nocardiosis [25–28]. However, emerging evidence indicates that low-dose TMP-SMX prophylaxis does not reliably prevent nocardiosis [29]. In solid organ transplant recipients, 18% to 40% of nocardiosis cases have been reported despite TMP-SMX prophylaxis, suggesting that prophylaxis reduces but does not eliminate risk [29]. Similar observations have been reported in patients with autoimmune diseases and hematologic malignancies [30]. However, a recent meta-analysis reported that TMP-SMX prophylaxis was associated with a 70% reduction in the odds of nocardiosis among solid organ transplant recipients [18]. However, while TMP-SMX may reduce the risk, it does not completely eliminate it. Patients presenting with a compatible clinical syndrome should be evaluated for nocardiosis regardless of prophylaxis [31].
A case series of immunocompromised hosts by Palombo et al illustrates the variability of presentation and outcomes [19]. Patients 1 and 3, who lacked TMP-SMX prophylaxis, developed rapidly progressive pulmonary nocardiosis with poor outcomes despite broad-spectrum antibiotics, both succumbing within 30 days. In contrast, patient 2, who received TMP-SMX prophylaxis, achieved favorable outcomes with early targeted therapy and prolonged follow-up. Similarly, patients 4, 5, and 6 demonstrated variable courses: some resolved with prolonged targeted therapy, while others developed disseminated infection or CNS involvement, particularly under intensive immunosuppression or delayed diagnosis [19].
Our patient developed breakthrough pulmonary nocardiosis despite ongoing low-dose TMP-SMX prophylaxis, an uncommon event that underscores prophylaxis limitations in high-risk, immunosuppressed patients [30]. Her initial presentation was indolent and asymptomatic, with pulmonary nodules discovered incidentally, highlighting the potential for subclinical disease in patients on prophylaxis. Despite confirmed TMP-SMX susceptibility, the infection eventually disseminated to the CNS, emphasizing the interplay between host immunity, pathogen virulence, and pharmacologic factors in disease progression. This contrasts with Palombo et al’s patients 2 and 5, in whom early recognition, targeted therapy, and combination regimens prevented dissemination [19]. Previous studies and case series have similarly reported relapse or treatment failure despite apparent susceptibility, particularly in patients with ongoing immunosuppression and CNS involvement [14,19,22].
The present case also emphasizes important therapeutic considerations. Current expert recommendations favor combination therapy for disseminated nocardiosis or CNS involvement, typically using TMP-SMX with agents such as linezolid, imipenem, or amikacin, followed by prolonged maintenance therapy [30,31]. Socioeconomic factors [32], as in this patient, may further complicate adherence to optimal treatment regimens and contribute to adverse outcomes [33,34].
In summary, this case reinforces that nocardiosis remains a life-threatening opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients and that breakthrough infection can occur despite appropriate TMP-SMX prophylaxis and in vitro susceptibility.
Conclusions
This case demonstrates that breakthrough nocardiosis can develop in immunocompromised patients despite long-term TMP-SMX prophylaxis and apparent in vitro susceptibility. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for nocardiosis in patients receiving corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive therapies and recognize that in vitro susceptibility does not always predict in vivo therapeutic success. This report highlights that breakthrough
Figures
Figure 1. Initial computed tomography scan findings (November 4, 2024). The scans reveal the emergence of a newly developed high-density consolidation in the right upper lobe. Following these findings, empirical treatment with intravenous ceftazidime (2 g twice daily) was initiated, while fluconazole (400 mg daily) administration was continued. (A) Lung window view; (B) mediastinal window view.
Figure 2. Follow-up chest computed tomography scan after 1 month of voriconazole therapy (December 4, 2024). (A–C) Lung window images demonstrate progression of the consolidation in the right upper lobe compared to prior scans, with an increase in size and density. (D–F) Corresponding mediastinal window images for the lung window images presented in (A–C).
Figure 3. Computed tomography–guided percutaneous lung biopsy (December 6, 2024). (A) Lung window view; (B) mediastinal window view, illustrating the biopsy site and surrounding anatomy.
Figure 4. Weak acid-fast staining of N. africana/nova complex from the patient’s biopsy specimen. The microorganisms display a delicate, branching, filamentous morphology typical of Nocardia species. Stained a faint purple color, they exhibit weak acid-fast positivity, a key diagnostic feature that distinguishes Nocardia from other bacteria.
Figure 5. Chest computed tomography findings before treatment escalation (December 12, 2024). (A–D) Lung window images reveal further progression of the lesion in the right upper lobe compared to earlier scans, with increased size, density, and scope. (E–H) Corresponding mediastinal window images.
Figure 6. Follow-up chest computed tomography scans after 10 days of escalated antimicrobial therapy with high-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX, three tablets orally 3 times daily) combined with linezolid (600 mg orally twice daily) (December 21, 2024). (A–E) Lung window images demonstrate a significant reduction in the extent and density of previously observed consolidations and nodular opacities in the right upper lobe, indicating a positive therapeutic response.
Figure 7. A Follow-up chest computed tomography scans after one month of antimicrobial therapy with high-dose TMP-SMX monotherapy (three tablets orally three times daily), following discontinuation of linezolid due to limited access in the patient’s rural residence and confirmed TMP-SMX susceptibility (January 5, 2025). (A–F) Lung window images show a continued significant reduction in the extent and density of consolidations and nodular opacities in the right upper lobe, indicative of sustained therapeutic response.
Figure 8. A follow-up chest computed tomography scan was performed on March 9, 2025, during the patient’s readmission for acute confusion and altered mental status. (A–D) The scan reveals a relapse of the pulmonary infection, characterized by the emergence of cavitary lesions and pleural effusion.
Figure 9. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed concurrently with the chest computed tomography scan on March 9, 2025. (A–C) The MRI reveals multiple ring-enhancing cerebral abscesses, a hallmark radiological indicator of disseminated nocardiosis. References
1. Dropulic LK, Lederman HM, Overview of infections in the immunocompromised host: Microbiol Spectr, 2016; 4(4) DMIH2-0026-2016
2. Spallone A, Ariza-Heredia EJ, Chemaly RF, Acute and latent viral infections in immunocompromised patients: A tale of brave battles and menacing foes: Clin Microbiol Infect, 2022; 28(10); 1319-20
3. Cheng GS, Crothers K, Aliberti S, Immunocompromised host pneumonia: Definitions and diagnostic criteria: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report: Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2023; 20(3); 341-53
4. Sassine J, Skevaki C, Chemaly RF, Infections in immunocompromised hosts: Progress made and challenges ahead: Clin Microbiol Infect, 2025; 31(1); 22-23
5. Masur H, Brooks JT, Benson CA, Prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents: Updated guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health, and HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America: Clin Infect Dis, 2014; 58(9); 1308-11
6. Ambrosioni J, Levi LI, Alagaratnam J, Major revision version 13.0 of the European AIDS Clinical Society guidelines 2025: HIV Med, 2026; 27(1); 18-32
7. Green M, Blumberg EA, Danziger-Isakov L: Clin Transplant, 2019; 33(9); e13642
8. Konstantinovic N, Guegan H, Stäjner T, Treatment of toxoplasmosis: Current options and future perspectives: Food Waterborne Parasitol, 2019; 15; e00036
9. Jung R, Au J, Burnell J: Ann Pharmacother, 2025; 59(7); 604-11
10. Alavi Darazam I, Shamaei M, Mobarhan M, Nocardiosis: Risk factors, clinical characteristics and outcome: Iran Red Crescent Med J, 2013; 15(5); 436-39
11. Traxler RM, Bell ME, Lasker B: Clin Microbiol Rev, 2022; 35(4); e0002721
12. Rawat D, Rajasurya V, Chakraborty RK, Nocardiosis. [Updated 2023 Jul 31]: StatPearls [Internet], 2026, Treasure Island (FL), StatPearls Publishing Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526075/
13. Du B, Song Z, Ren Z, The global epidemiology, risk factors, and mortality prediction of nocardiosis: An easily missed opportunistic infection: Sci Rep, 2025; 15(1); 42090
14. Meena DS, Kumar D, Bohra GK, Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of central nervous system nocardiosis: A systematic review of reported cases: Med Princ Pract, 2022; 31(4); 333-41
15. Tajima Y, Tashiro T, Furukawa T, Pulmonary nocardiosis with endobronchial involvement caused by nocardiaaraoensis: Chest, 2024; 165(1); e1-e4
16. Chirila RM, Harris D, Gupta V, Clinical and radiological characterization of central nervous system involvement in nocardiosis: A 20-year experience: Cureus, 2024; 16(1); e52950
17. Margalit I, Lebeaux D, Tishler O, How do I manage nocardiosis?: Clin Microbiol Infect, 2021; 27(4); 550-58
18. Passerini M, Nayfeh T, Yetmar ZA, Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole significantly reduces the risk of nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis: Clin Microbiol Infect, 2024; 30(2); 170-77
19. Palomba E, Liparoti A, Tonizzo A, Nocardia infections in the immunocompromised host: A case series and literature review: Microorganisms, 2022; 10(6); 1120
20. Li S, Song XY, Zhao YY, Clinical analysis of pulmonary nocardiosis in patients with autoimmune disease: Medicine (Baltimore), 2015; 94(39); e1561
21. Su H, Zhu Q, Zhang Y: BMC Infect Dis, 2025; 25(1); 792
22. Rafiei N, Peri AM, Righi E, Central nervous system nocardiosis in Queensland: A report of 20 cases and review of the literature: Medicine (Baltimore), 2016; 95(46); e5255
23. Anagnostou T, Arvanitis M, Kourkoumpetis TK, Nocardiosis of the central nervous system: Experience from a general hospital and review of 84 cases from the literature: Medicine (Baltimore), 2014; 93(1); 19-32
24. Restrepo A, Clark NM: Clin Transplant, 2019; 33(9); e13509
25. Yetmar ZA, Thoendel MJ, Bosch W, Risk factors and outcomes of nocardiosis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: Transplant Cell Ther, 2023; 29(3); 206e1-06.e7
26. De Greef J, Averbuch D, Tondeur L: J Infect, 2024; 88(6); 106162
27. Molina A, Winston DJ, Pan D, Schiller GJ, Increased incidence of nocardial infections in an era of atovaquone prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2018; 24(8); 1715-20
28. Gkirkas K, Stamouli M, Thomopoulos T: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2019; 25(9); e298-e99
29. Yetmar ZA, Wilson JW, Beam E, Recurrent nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: An evaluation of secondary prophylaxis: Transpl Infect Dis, 2021; 23(6); e13753
30. Yetmar ZA, Khodadadi RB, Chesdachai S, Epidemiology, timing, and secondary prophylaxis of recurrent nocardiosis: Open Forum Infect Dis, 2024; 11(4); ofae122
31. Yetmar ZA, Marty PK, Clement J, State-of-the-art review: Modern approach to nocardiosis-diagnosis, management, and uncertainties: Clin Infect Dis, 2025; 80(4); e53-e64
32. Wilder B, Pinedo A, Abusin S, A Global perspective on socioeconomic determinants of cardiovascular health: Can J Cardiol, 2025; 41(1); 45-59
33. Cardet JC, Louisias M, King TS, Income is an independent risk factor for worse asthma outcomes: J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2018; 141(2); 754-60e3
34. Nedel FB, Bastos JL, Whither social determinants of health?: Rev Saude Publica, 2020; 54; 15
Figures
Figure 1. Initial computed tomography scan findings (November 4, 2024). The scans reveal the emergence of a newly developed high-density consolidation in the right upper lobe. Following these findings, empirical treatment with intravenous ceftazidime (2 g twice daily) was initiated, while fluconazole (400 mg daily) administration was continued. (A) Lung window view; (B) mediastinal window view.
Figure 2. Follow-up chest computed tomography scan after 1 month of voriconazole therapy (December 4, 2024). (A–C) Lung window images demonstrate progression of the consolidation in the right upper lobe compared to prior scans, with an increase in size and density. (D–F) Corresponding mediastinal window images for the lung window images presented in (A–C).
Figure 3. Computed tomography–guided percutaneous lung biopsy (December 6, 2024). (A) Lung window view; (B) mediastinal window view, illustrating the biopsy site and surrounding anatomy.
Figure 4. Weak acid-fast staining of N. africana/nova complex from the patient’s biopsy specimen. The microorganisms display a delicate, branching, filamentous morphology typical of Nocardia species. Stained a faint purple color, they exhibit weak acid-fast positivity, a key diagnostic feature that distinguishes Nocardia from other bacteria.
Figure 5. Chest computed tomography findings before treatment escalation (December 12, 2024). (A–D) Lung window images reveal further progression of the lesion in the right upper lobe compared to earlier scans, with increased size, density, and scope. (E–H) Corresponding mediastinal window images.
Figure 6. Follow-up chest computed tomography scans after 10 days of escalated antimicrobial therapy with high-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX, three tablets orally 3 times daily) combined with linezolid (600 mg orally twice daily) (December 21, 2024). (A–E) Lung window images demonstrate a significant reduction in the extent and density of previously observed consolidations and nodular opacities in the right upper lobe, indicating a positive therapeutic response.
Figure 7. A Follow-up chest computed tomography scans after one month of antimicrobial therapy with high-dose TMP-SMX monotherapy (three tablets orally three times daily), following discontinuation of linezolid due to limited access in the patient’s rural residence and confirmed TMP-SMX susceptibility (January 5, 2025). (A–F) Lung window images show a continued significant reduction in the extent and density of consolidations and nodular opacities in the right upper lobe, indicative of sustained therapeutic response.
Figure 8. A follow-up chest computed tomography scan was performed on March 9, 2025, during the patient’s readmission for acute confusion and altered mental status. (A–D) The scan reveals a relapse of the pulmonary infection, characterized by the emergence of cavitary lesions and pleural effusion.
Figure 9. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed concurrently with the chest computed tomography scan on March 9, 2025. (A–C) The MRI reveals multiple ring-enhancing cerebral abscesses, a hallmark radiological indicator of disseminated nocardiosis. In Press
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.949976
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950290
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950607
Case report
Am J Case Rep In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.950985
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Dec 2021 : Case report
17,691,734
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934347
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934347
06 Dec 2021 : Case report
164,491
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.934406
Am J Case Rep 2021; 22:e934406
21 Jun 2024 : Case report
113,090
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.944371
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e944371
07 Mar 2024 : Case report
59,175
DOI :10.12659/AJCR.943133
Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e943133







